Therapists’ Perceptions of Social Media and Video Game Technologies in Upper Limb Rehabilitation

Background The application of technologies, such as video gaming and social media for rehabilitation, is garnering interest in the medical field. However, little research has examined clinicians’ perspectives regarding technology adoption by their clients. Objective The objective of our study was to explore therapists’ perceptions of how young people and adults with hemiplegia use gaming and social media technologies in daily life and in rehabilitation, and to identify barriers to using these technologies in rehabilitation. Methods We conducted two focus groups comprised of ten occupational therapists/physiotherapists who provide neurorehabilitation to individuals with hemiplegia secondary to stroke or cerebral palsy. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The diffusion of innovations theory provided a framework to interpret emerging themes. Results Therapists were using technology in a limited capacity. They identified barriers to using social media and gaming technology with their clients, including a lack of age appropriateness, privacy issues with social media, limited transfer of training, and a lack of accessibility of current systems. Therapists also questioned their role in the context of technology-based interventions. The opportunity for social interaction was perceived as a major benefit of integrated gaming and social media. Conclusions This study reveals the complexities associated with adopting new technologies in clinical practice, including the need to consider both client and clinician factors. Despite reporting several challenges with applying gaming and social media technology with clinical populations, therapists identified opportunities for increased social interactions and were willing to help shape the development of an upper limb training system that could more readily meet the needs of clients with hemiplegia. By considering the needs of both therapists and clients, technology developers may increase the likelihood that clinicians will adopt innovative technologies.

[1]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[2]  B. Dan,et al.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006 , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology. Supplement.

[3]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[5]  A. Boaz,et al.  Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature , 2011, BMC Research Notes.

[6]  H. F. Machiel Van der Loos,et al.  FEATHERS, A bimanual upper limb rehabilitation platform: A case study of user-centred approach in rehabilitation device design , 2015 .

[7]  C. Colomer,et al.  Effectiveness of a Wii balance board-based system (eBaViR) for balance rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with acquired brain injury , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Carl Machover,et al.  Virtual reality , 1994, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  S. Lennon,et al.  Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the arm after hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Social Media: A Review and Tutorial of Applications in Medicine and Health Care , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Use of Virtual Reality to Enhance Balance and Ambulation in Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  Stephanie M. N. Glegg,et al.  Factors Influencing Therapists' Adoption of Virtual Reality for Brain Injury Rehabilitation , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  Terry Kind,et al.  Social Media and Clinical Care: Ethical, Professional, and Social Implications , 2013, Circulation.

[14]  Patrice L Tamar Weiss,et al.  Role of Virtual Reality for Cerebral Palsy Management , 2014, Journal of child neurology.

[15]  Tom Chau,et al.  The development of a home-based virtual reality therapy system to promote upper extremity movement for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy , 2009 .

[16]  E. Rogers A Prospective and Retrospective Look at the Diffusion Model , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[17]  Sophie K. Scott The researcher of the future…makes the most of social media , 2013, The Lancet.

[18]  Catherine E. Lang,et al.  Translating Animal Doses of Task-Specific Training to People With Chronic Stroke in 1-Hour Therapy Sessions: A Proof-of-Concept Study , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook , 2013, New Media Soc..

[20]  Ananda Hochstenbach-Waelen,et al.  Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[22]  E. Rogers Diffusion of preventive innovations. , 2002, Addictive behaviors.

[23]  D. Levac,et al.  When is virtual reality "therapy"? , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  I. Yoon,et al.  Effects of virtual reality on upper extremity function and activities of daily living performance in acute stroke: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[25]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Use of an interactive video gaming program compared with conventional physiotherapy for hospitalised older adults: a feasibility trial , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  Tahir Masud,et al.  The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions in improving balance in adults with impaired balance compared with standard or no treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  P. Weiss,et al.  Virtual Reality in the Assessment and Treatment of Children With Motor Impairment: A Systematic Review , 2011 .

[29]  M. Berger,et al.  Gaming supports youth with acquired brain injury? A pilot study , 2012, Brain injury.

[30]  Liisa Holsti,et al.  The GestureTek virtual reality system in rehabilitation: a scoping review , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[31]  A. Majnemer,et al.  Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy , 2010, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[32]  Mindy E. Flanagan,et al.  Open Access Implementation Science the Effect of Provider-and Workflow-focused Strategies for Guideline Implementation on Provider Acceptance , 2022 .

[33]  KimGerard Jounghyun,et al.  A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy , 2005 .

[34]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[35]  H. V. D. Van der Loos,et al.  Video Games and Rehabilitation: Using Design Principles to Enhance Engagement in Physical Therapy , 2013, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[36]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[37]  M. Levin,et al.  Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Meta-Analysis and Implications for Clinicians , 2011, Stroke.

[38]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .