Maintaining Viability with Multiple Needs

How do organisms remain viable in environmental conditions that do not meet all of their needs? Often, different modes of behavior and ecological resources cannot be sufficiently achieved simultaneously. As a result, organisms must make judgements regarding priority, counterbalancing as they precariously move from one physical limit to the next. Here, we produce a minimal protocell model that allows us to explore this dynamic, and in the process see how previously developed methods of analysis in viability theory hold up when applied to a higher dimensional system. One distinction we come across is that an environment made up of conditions revealed as not being survivable by a parametric scan can nonetheless be sustainable for an agent traversing across those different possibilities. The result of this is that the only way to tell how survivable a specific environment will be for an organism is to understand the interaction between behavioral and metabolic dynamics.

[1]  C. Postlethwaite,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of The Viability of a Protocell , 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[2]  Matthew D. Egbert,et al.  Adapting to Adaptations: Behavioural Strategies that are Robust to Mutations and Other Organisational-Transformations , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  A. Moreno,et al.  Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry , 2015 .

[4]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Norm-Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency , 2014, Artificial Life.

[5]  M. Egbert Bacterial Chemotaxis: Introverted or Extroverted? A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Basic Forms of Metabolism-Based and Metabolism-Independent Behavior Using a Computational Model , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  H. Sauro Enzyme Kinetics for Systems Biology , 2012 .

[7]  A. Cornish-Bowden,et al.  From L'Homme Machine to metabolic closure: steps towards understanding life. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  W. Ashby,et al.  Design for a brain; the origin of adaptive behavior , 2011 .

[9]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[10]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  The Process Dynamics of Normative Function , 2002 .

[11]  Jacqueline Grennon , 2nd Ed. , 2002, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[12]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction , 1996 .

[13]  J. Todd,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS , 1984, The Lancet.

[14]  H. Jonas The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[15]  W. Luder Introduction to thermodynamics of irreversible processes , 1955 .