Labour Turnover and Retention in New Zealand: The Causes and Consequences of Leaving and Staying with Employers:

This study represents the most comprehensive survey to date of labour turnover and employee loyalty in New Zealand. The widely held view that the New Zealand worker has become more mobile in the contemporary labour market is shown to be somewhat simplistic. Instead, the picture is one of increasing employment stability as people get older and as they become better paid, lending support to the idea that there are identifiable developmental stages affecting the careers of both men and women. In terms of the reasons for employee turnover, the study demonstrates that motivation for job change is multidimensional: no one factor will explain it. While interesting work is the strongest attractor and retainer in the labour market, the results also show that there is a strong employee expectation that management should make personnel decisions based on merit, demonstrate that extrinsic rewards (such as pay, promotion and security) play a role in both employee retention and turnover, lend support to the idea that there is growing concern with work-life balance, and underline the retention value of good relationships with co-workers and supervisors. The results demonstrate that employee turnover is not riskless for individuals: some benefit a lot (for example, in finding worthwhile promotion), while others do badly out of it. The study offers suggestions for improving retention in firms with dysfunctional employee turnover.

[1]  J. Monks,et al.  Trends in Voluntary and Involuntary Job Turnover , 1998 .

[2]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  The relationship between work status congruence and work-related attitudes and behaviors. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  James L. Price,et al.  The Study of Turnover. , 1978 .

[4]  Michael R. Reich,et al.  Micro-Macro Linkages in High-Performance Employment Systems , 1997 .

[5]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Jim Kitay,et al.  From Tellers to Sellers: Changing Employment Relations in Banks , 1999 .

[7]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[8]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  AGE AND VOLUNTARY TURNOVER: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW , 1995 .

[9]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Turnover and organizational performance: a comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Nick Oliver,et al.  High-Performance Manufacturing: Evidence from the Automotive Components Industry , 1997 .

[11]  Roger Penn,et al.  Skill and Occupational Change , 1996 .

[12]  P. Hom.  Employee Turnover , 1994 .

[13]  John L. Cotton,et al.  Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with Implications for Research , 1986 .

[14]  R. Mowday,et al.  The influence of task and personality characteristics on employee turnover and absenteeism incidents. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[15]  P. Hom,et al.  Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. , 1991 .

[16]  C. Hellman,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Intent to Leave , 1997 .

[17]  L. Greenhalgh.  A Process Model of Organizational Turnover: The Relationship with Job Security as a Case in Point , 1980 .

[18]  Eric Trist,et al.  The Representation of Labour Turnover as a Social Process , 1950 .

[19]  Aneil Mishra,et al.  To stay or to go: voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing , 2002 .

[20]  P. Callister.  New Zealand Department of Labour Occasional Paper Series Trends in Employee Tenure, Turnover and Work Scheduling Patterns: A Review of the Empirical Research Evidence , 1997 .

[21]  C. S. Koberg,et al.  The psychology of the withdrawal process: a cross-validational test of Mobley's intermediate linkages model of turnover in two samples. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  J. George,et al.  When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice , 2001 .

[23]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Turnover turned over: an expanded and positive perspective. , 1979, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[24]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Survival versus traditional methodologies for studying employee turnover: differences, divergences and directions for future research , 1999 .

[25]  Susan J. Lambert,et al.  Added Benefits: The Link Between Work-Life Benefits and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2000 .

[26]  S. Aryee,et al.  Family-Responsive Variables and Retention-Relevant Outcomes Among Employed Parents , 1998 .

[27]  H. Rees,et al.  A Disaggregate Analysis of the Evolution of Job Tenure in Britain, 1975–1993 , 1998 .

[28]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  P. Hom,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium , 2000 .

[30]  K. Purcell.  Changing boundaries in employment , 2000 .

[31]  D. Levinson,et al.  Seasons of a man's life , 1978 .

[32]  Gail Sheehy,et al.  Passages: Predictable Crises of Adult Life , 1976 .

[33]  M. Somers.  Modelling employee withdrawal behaviour over time: A study of turnover using survival analysis , 1996 .

[34]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  The cesspool syndrome: How dreck floats to the top of declining organizations , 1998 .

[35]  Peter Haynes,et al.  Human resources, service quality and performance: a case study , 2000 .

[36]  Kevin J. Sigler.  Challenges of employee retention , 1999 .

[37]  Daniel J. Koys.  The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness , 2001 .