Impact of a new respiratory amplitude-based gating technique in evaluation of upper abdominal PET lesions.

UNLABELLED PET acquisition requires several minutes which can lead to respiratory motion blurring, to increase partial volume effect and SUV under-estimation. To avoid these artifacts, conventional 10-min phase-based respiratory gating (PBRG) can be performed but is time-consuming and difficult with a non-compliant patient. We evaluated an automatic amplitude-based gating method (AABG) which keeps 35% of the counts at the end of expiration to minimize respiratory motion. We estimated the impact of AABG on upper abdominal lesion detectability, quantification and patient management. METHODS We consecutively included 31 patients (82 hepatic and 25 perihepatic known lesions). Each patient underwent 3 acquisitions on a Siemens Biograph mCT (4 rings and time-of-flight): a standard free-breathing whole-body (SWB, 5-7 steps/2.5 min per step, 3.3±0.4 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG), a 10-min PBRG with six bins and a 5-min AABG method. All gated acquisitions were performed with an ANZAI respiratory gating system. SUVmax and target to background ratio (TBR, defined as the maximum SUV of the lesion divided by the mean SUV of a region of interest drawn in healthy liver) were compared. RESULTS All 94 lesions in SWB images were detected in the gated images. 10-min PBRG and 5-min AABG acquisitions respectively revealed 9 and 13 new lesions and relocated 7 and 8 lesions. Four lesions revealed by 5-min AABG were missed by 10-min PBRG in 3 non-compliant patients. Both gated methods failed to relocate 2 lesions seen on SWB acquisition. Compared to SWB, TBR increased significantly with 10-min PBRG and with 5-min AABG (respectively 41±59%, p=4.10-3 and 66±75%, p=6.10-5) whereas SUVmax did not (respectively 14±43%, p=0.29 with 10-min PBRG, and 24±46%, p=0.11 with 5-min AABG). CONCLUSION The AABG is a fast and a user-friendly respiratory gating method to increase detectability and quantification of upper abdominal lesions compared to the conventional PBRG procedure and the SWB acquisition.

[1]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Accuracy of image fusion of normal upper abdominal organs visualized with PET/CT , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  H. Oikawa,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors of patients with unresectable synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer , 1997, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  A. Altendorf-Hofmann,et al.  Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: Impact of surgical resection on the natural history , 1990, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  Jean-Claude Liehn,et al.  Respiratory motion artefact in the liver dome on FDG PET/CT: comparison of attenuation correction with CT and a caesium external source , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Clinical value of whole-body positron emission tomography in potentially curable colorectal liver metastases☆ , 2001 .

[6]  T. Takada,et al.  Proposal of criteria to select candidates with colorectal liver metastases for hepatic resection: comparison of our scoring system to the positive number of risk factors. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  E. Potchen,et al.  Assessment of hepatic respiratory excursion. , 1972, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  J Daouk,et al.  Respiratory-gated positron emission tomography and breath-hold computed tomography coupling to reduce the influence of respiratory motion: Methodology and feasibility , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[10]  P. Tekkis,et al.  Evaluation of Long-term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multifactorial Model of 929 Patients , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[11]  O. Schober,et al.  Respiratory gating in positron emission tomography: a quantitative comparison of different gating schemes. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  T. Ravikumar,et al.  Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Biologic perspective. , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[13]  S. Fujita,et al.  Usefulness of a deep-inspiration breath-hold 18F-FDG PET/CT technique in diagnosing liver, bile duct, and pancreas tumors , 2009, Nuclear medicine communications.

[14]  Henkjan Huisman,et al.  Evaluation of Image Registration in PET/CT of the Liver and Recommendations for Optimized Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  The Natural History of Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Comparison with Resective Treatment , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[16]  W. Oyen,et al.  Improved Selection of Patients for Hepatic Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases with 18F-FDG PET: A Randomized Study , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. , 1984, Archives of surgery.

[18]  James Hamill,et al.  Optimal gating compared to 3D and 4D PET reconstruction for characterization of lung tumours , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Tomio Inoue,et al.  Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT of Lung Cancer: Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Analysis of 108 Patients , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Heiko Schöder,et al.  Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Findings with a New Technique for Detection and Characterization of Thoracic Lesions , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Yaparpalvi,et al.  Technical aspects of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2012, Seminars in nuclear medicine.