The Disciplinary Status of Consumer Behavior: A Sociology of Science Perspective on Key Controversies

Critics within the consumer behavior field have consistently debated three fundamental issues about the field’s defining properties and goals: (1) whether consumer behavior should be an independent discipline, (2) what is (and is not) consumer behavior, and (3) whether our field should be interdisciplinary. Taking the perspective of the sociology of science leads us to conclude that (1) consumer behavior is not an independent discipline; (2) consumer behavior is distinguished from other fields by its focus on a consumer role, emphasizing the acquisition, consumption, and disposal of marketplace products, services, and experiences; and (3) consumer behavior is not an interdisciplinary field.

[1]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[2]  James F. Engel,et al.  The Current Status of Consumer Behavior Research: Developments During the 1968-1972 Period , 1972 .

[3]  Harold H. Kassarjian,et al.  Perspectives in consumer behavior , 1973 .

[4]  Robert Aaron Gordon,et al.  Higher Education for Business , 1959 .

[5]  W. Wiegand.  : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[6]  R. Bagozzi.  Marketing as Exchange , 1975 .

[7]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Marketing : contributions from the behavioral sciences , 1965 .

[8]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[9]  G. Stocking.  Delimiting anthropology : Historical reflections on the boundaries of a boundless discipline , 1995 .

[10]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  ACR Presidential Address: Happy Thought , 1987 .

[11]  D. Mick,et al.  Presidential Address: Meaning and Mattering Through Transformative Consumer Research , 2006 .

[12]  G. Katona.  What is consumer psychology? , 1967, The American psychologist.

[13]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[14]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Voting for a Political Candidate Under Conditions of Minimal Information , 1974 .

[15]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research , 1988 .

[16]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[17]  H. Echols.  Scientific Community , 1972, Nature.

[18]  W. Mcguire.  Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice , 1976 .

[19]  D. Iacobucci.  From the Editor-Elect , 2002 .

[20]  Bernadette Wren,et al.  Tenth Anniversary Editorial , 2005 .

[21]  R. Ferber.  Can Consumer Research Be Interdisciplinary , 1977 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Bernhardt.  Association For Consumer Research 1983 Presidential Address: ACR - Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1984 .

[23]  F. Urbancic,et al.  Marketing Journals:: A Study of University Library Holdings , 1997 .

[24]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the “4 Eras” of Thought Development , 2003 .

[25]  D. Littler,et al.  Positioning alternative perspectives of consumer behaviour , 1998 .

[26]  S. Levy.  Symbols for Sale , 1999 .

[27]  M. Holbrook.  Why Business Is Bad For Consumer Research: the Three Bears Revisited , 1985 .

[28]  A. Levine.  Educational and Occupational Choice: A Synthesis of Literature from Sociology and Psychology , 1976 .

[29]  J. Jacoby.  ACR Presidential Address Consumer Research: Telling It Like It Is , 1976 .

[30]  Angelique Chettiparamb,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: a literature review , 2007 .

[31]  Consumer Behavior: Surpluses A Shortages , 1982 .

[32]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  The role of aesthetic taste in consumer behavior , 2012 .

[33]  J. B. Kernan.  Declaring a Discipline: Reflections on ACR's Silver Anniversary , 1995 .

[34]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Fragmentation in the Field—and the Movement Toward Integration in Communication Science , 1988 .

[35]  Creative marginality. Innovation at the intersection of the social sciences: Mattei Dogan and Robert Pahre (Oxford: Westview Press, 1990), ix + 278 pp., $34.85 (SC), paper , 1991 .

[36]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge: Lay People's and Researchers' Beliefs about the Psychology of Advertising , 1995 .

[37]  M. Reimann,et al.  Worldwide Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals: Rankings, Trends, Comparisons, and Segmentations , 2009 .

[38]  M. Holbrook.  What Is Consumer Research , 1987 .

[39]  Ronald J. Bauerly,et al.  An evaluation of journals used in doctoral marketing programs , 2005 .

[40]  E. Hirschman.  Scientific Style and the Conduct of Consumer Research , 1985 .

[41]  Werner Kroeber-Riel,et al.  Activation Research: Psychobiological Approaches in Consumer Research , 1979 .

[42]  M. Dogan,et al.  Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. , 1992 .

[43]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[44]  P. Kivisto.  Chaos of disciplines , 2002 .

[45]  J. Sheth,et al.  A Model of Primary Voter Behavior , 1985 .

[46]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Presidential Address: 1980 , 1981 .

[47]  W. Hagstrom.  The scientific community , 1966 .

[48]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer research: in search of identity. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  R. Pieters,et al.  The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time , 2003 .

[50]  George Katona,et al.  Psychology and Consumer Economics , 1974 .

[51]  Dipankar Chakravarti.  Appraising consumer research: There’s more to vision than meets the eye , 1992 .

[52]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[53]  John Deighton,et al.  From the EditorThe Territory of Consumer Research: Walking the Fences , 2007 .

[54]  Edgar H. Sibley,et al.  Tenth anniversary editorial , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Kenneth C. Schneider,et al.  Prevention of Accidental Poisoning Through Package and Label Design , 1977 .

[56]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Social Science Research on Business: Product and Potential , 1959 .

[57]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[58]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[59]  M. Bazerman.  Consumer Research for Consumers , 2001 .

[60]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  New Academic Fields as Admittance-Seeking Social Movements: The Case of Strategic Management , 2008 .

[61]  L. Apostel.  Interdisciplinarity : problems of teaching and research in universities , 1972 .

[62]  Eric H. Shaw,et al.  A history of schools of marketing thought , 2005 .

[63]  R. W. Pratt,et al.  Acr: a Perspective , 1974 .

[64]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Broadening the Concept of Consumer Behavior , 1975 .

[65]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  What Consumer Research Is , 1987 .

[66]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Chaos of disciplines , 2001 .

[67]  E. Arnould,et al.  Reflections and Reviews Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research , 2005 .

[68]  J. Olson.  Presidential Address -- 1981:N Toward a Science of Consumer Behavior , 1982 .

[69]  S. M. Leong.  A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research , 1989 .

[70]  S. Greendorfer.  Specialization, Fragmentation, Integration, Discipline, Profession: What is the Real Issue? , 1987 .

[71]  Robert Pahre,et al.  Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences , 1989 .

[72]  G. Haines,et al.  The Theory of Buyer Behavior. , 1970 .

[73]  R. Coleman,et al.  The Continuing Significance of Social Class to Marketing , 1983 .

[74]  Ernest Dichter,et al.  Handbook of consumer motivations , 1964 .

[75]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  Presidential Address Positivism, Naturalism and Pluralism in Consumer Research: Paradigms in Paradise , 1989 .

[76]  V. Folkes.  Presidential Address Is Consumer Behavior Different , 2002 .

[77]  H. S. White.  What do we want to be when we grow up , 1994 .

[78]  Alan R. Andreasen,et al.  A social marketing research agenda for consumer behavior researchers , 1993 .

[79]  D. Mick.  Introduction: The Moment and Place for a Special Issue , 2008 .

[80]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  An Experimental Test of the Harmful Effects of Premium-Oriented Commercials on Children , 1976 .

[81]  Dilman M. K. Smith,et al.  On knowing the consumer , 1966 .

[82]  R. Belk,et al.  Images of Ourselves: The Good Life in Twentieth Century Advertising , 1985 .

[83]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Some Recollections From a Quarter Century Ago , 1995 .

[84]  J. Helgeson,et al.  Consumer Research: Some History, Trends, and Thoughts , 1985 .

[85]  Moti Nissani,et al.  Fruits, Salads, and Smoothies: A Working Definition of Interdisciplinarity , 1995 .

[86]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Needed: A Larger Sense of Marketing and Scholarship , 2005 .

[87]  William H. Newell,et al.  Defining and Teaching Interdisciplinary Studies , 1982 .

[88]  Presidential Address Consumer Behavior As a Social Science , 2001 .

[89]  B. Ratchford.  The New Economic Theory of Consumer Behavior: An Interpretive Essay , 1975 .

[90]  G. Towl.  Editorial , 2012, Evidence Based Mental Health.

[91]  F. Nicosia,et al.  Toward a Sociology of Consumption , 1976 .

[92]  M. McCabe.  Presidential address. , 1970, Irish nurses' journal.

[93]  Bioethics Examiner.  What Do We Want to Be When We Grow Up , 2005 .

[94]  E. Hirschman.  Presidential Address Secular Mortality and the Dark Side of Consumer Behavior: Or How Semiotics Saved My Life , 1991 .