A pilot-scale comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of source segregated domestic food waste.

Source segregated food waste was collected from domestic properties and its composition determined together with the average weight produced per household, which was 2.91 kg per week. The waste was fed over a trial period lasting 58 weeks to an identical pair of 1.5 m(3) anaerobic digesters, one at a mesophilic (36.5 degrees C) and the other at a thermophilic temperature (56 degrees C). The digesters were monitored daily for gas production, solids destruction and regularly for digestate characteristics including alkalinity, pH, volatile fatty acid (VFA) and ammonia concentrations. Both digesters showed high VFA and ammonia concentrations but in the mesophilic digester the pH remained stable at around 7.4, buffered by a high alkalinity of 13,000 mg l(-1); whereas in the thermophilic digester VFA levels reached 45,000 mg l(-1) causing a drop in pH and digester instability. In the mesophilic digester volatile solids (VS) destruction and specific gas yield were favourable, with 67% of the organic solids being converted to biogas at a methane content of 58% giving a biogas yield of 0.63 m(3) kg(-1) VS(added). Digestion under thermophilic conditions showed potentially better VS destruction at 70% VS and a biogas yield of 0.67 m(3) kg(-1) VS(added), but the shifts in alkalinity and the high VFA concentrations required a reduced loading to be applied. The maximum beneficial loading that could be achieved in the mesophilic digester was 4.0 kg VS m(-3) d(-1).

[1]  W. M. Wiegant,et al.  The mechanism of ammonia inhibition in the thermophilic digestion of livestock wastes , 1986 .

[2]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[3]  Charles J. Banks Anaerobic digestion of solid and high nitrogen content fractions of slaughterhouse wastes , 1994 .

[4]  Hinrich Hartmann,et al.  A novel process configuration for anaerobic digestion of source-sorted household waste using hyper-thermophilic post-treatment. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  I Angelidaki,et al.  Effect of operating conditions and reactor configuration on efficiency of full-scale biogas plants. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  D Bolzonella,et al.  Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[7]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[8]  P. Westermann,et al.  Product Inhibition of Butyrate Metabolism by Acetate and Hydrogen in a Thermophilic Coculture , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  B. Ahring,et al.  A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: Focusing on ammonia inhibition , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  F. Cecchi,et al.  Two-phase continuous anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes , 1995 .

[11]  Y. Bar-Or,et al.  ホルミジウムとアナベノプシスの生産する高分子凝集物質の性質(Applied and Environmental Microbiology,53,1987) , 1991 .

[12]  M. Gerardi The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters , 2003 .

[13]  E. Favoino,et al.  Dealing with Food Waste in the UK , 2007 .