The Importance and Trickiness of Definition Strategies in Legal and Political Argumentation

This paper uses argumentation tools to show by means of analyzing nine cases from law and politics how argument strategies using persuasive definitions and quasi-definitions are powerful rhetorical tools of persuasion. By  bringing to lightthe argumentation structure found in these examples, it is shown that definitions and redefinitions can have serious legal and political implications. Persuasive definitions and quasi-definitions are modeled as two distinct strategies for altering the relationship between classification and evaluation of a state of affairs. Persuasive definitions are aimed at modifying the relationship between the definiendum and its referent. In quasi-definitions some characteristics of an entity or event leading to a specific value judgment are selected and made accessible, while other conflicting ones are excluded. Reframing an issue is shown to be related to both strategies.

[1]  C. W. Super.  Ethics and Language , 1910, The International Journal of Ethics.

[2]  Aldous Huxley,et al.  Eyeless in Gaza , 1936 .

[3]  C. Stevenson,et al.  II—THE EMOTIVE MEANING OF ETHICAL TERMS , 1937 .

[4]  C. Stevenson.  III.—ETHICAL JUDGMENTS AND AVOIDABILITY , 1938 .

[5]  C. Stevenson,et al.  IV.—PERSUASIVE DEFINITIONS , 1938 .

[6]  Aristotle.  The Complete Works Of Aristotle , 1954 .

[7]  Ruth E. Chambers.  Topics , 1973, Seminars in Perinatology.

[8]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[9]  Marius Victorinus,et al.  C. Marius Victorinus, Liber de Definitionibus Eine Spätantike Theorie der Definition Und des Definierens : Mit Einleitung, Übersetzung Und Kommentar , 1997 .

[10]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Issue Framing Effects on Belief Importance and Opinion , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  J. Schaeffer.  Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning , 2004 .

[12]  P. Sniderman,et al.  CHAPTER 5: The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing , 2004 .

[13]  M. T. Cicero,et al.  The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero , 2005 .

[14]  D. Zarefsky.  Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric , 2007 .

[15]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Invasive Alien Species , 2007 .

[16]  James N. Druckman,et al.  F RAMING T HEORY , 2007 .

[17]  D. Walton,et al.  Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories , 2009, Philosophy & Rhetoric.

[18]  G. Lakoff.  Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment , 2010 .

[19]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Methods of Argumentation , 2013 .

[20]  D. Lanzerath,et al.  Concepts and Values in Biodiversity , 2014 .

[21]  Fabrizio Macagno.  Analogy and Redefinition , 2014 .

[22]  D. Walton,et al.  Emotive Language in Argumentation , 2014 .

[23]  Framing biodiversity: the case of ‘invasive alien species’ , 2014 .

[24]  Fabrizio Macagno,et al.  Reconstructing Metaphorical Meaning , 2014 .