How Do Health Sciences Students Use Their Mobile Devices in Problem-Based Learning?

The increasing use of mobile devices among health sciences students presents both opportunities and challenges to problem-based learning (PBL) in face-to-face tutorials and during self-directed learning. The purpose of the present study was to find out how common the use of mobile devices is among students in PBL, how they are used, and whether some general recommendations can be made to help students make more effective use of mobile devices during PBL. Based on the findings of focus interviews of students and facilitators (Chan et al., 2015), the authors developed a self-administered online questionnaire to examine students’ usage of mobile devices in PBL. The students from three healthcare professional programmes in a university in Hong Kong were invited to take part in the online survey. A total of 346 students (response rate of 31.89 %) completed the online questionnaire. It was found that almost all of them (99 %) own one or more mobile devices. Most of them (98 %) used their mobile devices in PBL, usually for educational purposes, such as the search and synthesis of information and the use of specific software on these devices, especially those for the visualization of knowledge (like atlases or software for creation of concept maps). There was a small percentage of students who never used mobile devices in PBL. The reasons included the facilitators’ explicit discouragement of their use, and the desire to focus on the discussion instead of searching for information. Based on the findings of the survey, the authors arrived at four recommendations aiming at more effective use of mobile devices in PBL: students should be free to choose to use mobile devices; mobile devices should be used for educational purposes only, such as the search for factual information or multimedia files; PBL tutorial time should mostly be spent on discussion, instead of searching for information; students should be encouraged to use cloud-based services for collaborative activities such as note-making and concept mapping in PBL.

[1]  Susan M Hunter Revell,et al.  Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms. , 2010, The Journal of nursing education.

[2]  Yuen-Yan Chan,et al.  Mobile learning: a new paradigm in electronic learning , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[3]  Roisin Donnelly,et al.  Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Susan Bridges,et al.  Blended learning and PBL: An interactional ethnographic approach to understanding knowledge construction in-situ , 2015 .

[6]  Jingyan Lu,et al.  Effects of Video Triggers on the PBL Process , 2012 .

[7]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[8]  T Winning,et al.  Problem-based learning in dental education: what's the evidence for and against...and is it worth the effort? , 2007, Australian dental journal.

[9]  Gaye Lightbody.  Ubiquitous Mobile Learning in Higher Education , 2009 .

[10]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Problem-based learning: Student learning experiences and outcomes , 2014, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[11]  L. Chu,et al.  Information technology and its role in anaesthesia training and continuing medical education. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[12]  Susan M. Montenery,et al.  Millennial Generation Student Nurses’ Perceptions of the Impact of Multiple Technologies on Learning , 2013, Nursing education perspectives.

[13]  Jingyan Lu,et al.  Differ in Socio-Cognitive Processes? Some Comparisons Between Paper and Video Triggered PBL , 2015 .

[14]  Michael G Botelho,et al.  PBL.2.0: Blended learning for an interactive, problem‐based pedagogy , 2010, Medical education.

[15]  Susan Bridges,et al.  Multimodality in Problem-Based Learning (PBL): An Interactional Ethnography , 2012 .

[16]  Aparna Purushothaman,et al.  Facilitating Sustainability of Education by Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) , 2013, iJET.

[17]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  Mobile collaborative concept mapping - combining classroom activity with simultaneous field exploration , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[18]  Yew Boon Chia,et al.  The survey on mobile library services in Hong Kong and Singapore academic libraries , 2012 .

[19]  Gurminder Singh,et al.  Collaborative note taking , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[20]  Edna Tal,et al.  Using cellular phones in higher education: mobile access to online course materials , 2005, IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'05).

[21]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Problem-Based Learning , 2014 .

[22]  Joseph Rene Corbeil,et al.  Are You Ready for Mobile Learning , 2007 .

[23]  Susan Bridges,et al.  Problem-Based Learning , 2014 .

[24]  Neel Sharma,et al.  A Qualitative Study on How Health Professional Students and Their PBL Facilitators Perceive the Use of Mobile Devices during PBL. , 2015 .

[25]  Martin Lehmann,et al.  Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education , 2008 .

[26]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[27]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[28]  C. McGrath,et al.  Journal-based learning, a new learning experience building on PBL at HKU. , 2013, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[29]  Robin Deterding,et al.  A Comparison of Critical Thinking in Groups of Third‐year Medical Students in Text, Video, and Virtual PBL Case Modalities , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.