Speed Learning: Maximizing Student Learning and Engagement in a Limited Amount of Time

Active learning has warranted great promise in improving student engagement and learning. It is not a new thought and has been promoted and encouraged as early as the 1980s. Due to the many benefits of active learning it is being practiced by many faculty in their classrooms. Faculty are urged to self-reflect on their teaching styles and work on improving the pedagogies to capture and maintain student interest by increasing student engagement. Although active learning has been used as an instrument to engage students and ultimately increase learning, it has seldom been implemented to directly impact learning relative to time. This paper explores the application of active learning pedagogy to help achieve maximum learning in a limited period of time. The active learning method employed in this study is grounded in classic pedagogies that have been developed based on various psychological theories of learning, motivation and engagement. After the employment of a series of this active learning technique a survey of the students revealed an increase in student learning. choose to participate in the quiz due to the support they receive from their partner during the quiz. Active learning also positively benefits student engagement and motivation. Several studies have suggested motivation and engagement is improved when students participate in speed learning activities. Providing students an opportunity to participate in active learning helps them stay engaged during lecture components of the course. This is a crucial component of learning, and thus an important concept in regards to this methodology. This study evaluates students learning preferences, after being exposed to multiple learning methodologies. We looked primarily at students' preferred learning method, their preference to learning with a partner and their suggestions for future class structure. In doing so we hope to test the effectiveness of the speed learning and determine future actions to provide an engaging and motivating environment for all students to learn efficiently, and gain confidence in their knowledge.

[1]  Yousef Amer,et al.  Leading Change: Applying Change Management Approaches to Engage Students in Blended Learning. , 2012 .

[2]  Laura W. Perna Understanding the Working College Student , 2023 .

[3]  J. Penner Why many college teachers cannot lecture: How to avoid communication breakdown in the classroom , 1984 .

[4]  James L. Cooper,et al.  The argument for making large classes seems small , 2000, New Directions for Teaching and Learning.

[5]  L. Earl,et al.  Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning , 2003 .

[6]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning , 1997 .

[7]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  Studying College Students in the 21st Century: Meeting New Challenges , 1997, The Review of Higher Education.

[8]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. , 1983 .

[9]  L. Shepard The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture , 2000 .

[10]  R. H. Waters,et al.  The role of repetition in learning. , 1959, American Journal of Psychology.

[11]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[12]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[13]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. , 1986 .

[14]  Douglas A. Bernstein,et al.  Teaching Psychology: A Step By Step Guide , 2004 .

[15]  J. Sherman Mathematics, spatial visualization, and related factors: changes in girls and boys, grades 8-11. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[16]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[17]  B. Davis Tools for Teaching , 1993 .

[18]  Chuanmei Wang An Investigation and Structure Model Study on College Students'Studying-interest , 2011 .

[19]  Phillip C. Wankat The effective, efficient professor , 2001 .

[20]  Barbara E. Walvoord,et al.  Effective grading : a tool for learning and assessment in college , 1998 .

[21]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[22]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[23]  S. Paul Students with disabilities in higher education: a review of the literature , 2000 .

[24]  E. Deci Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[25]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[26]  Baomin Qi,et al.  E-learning Tools to Improve Students' Learning Experience: a case study , 2009 .

[27]  Hulya Guvenc The Relationship between Teachers’ Motivational Support and Engagement versus Disaffection , 2015 .

[28]  Jianxin Peng,et al.  E-learning Tools to Improve Students’ Learning Experience: a case study , 2012 .

[29]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[30]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[31]  H. Harlow,et al.  Learning motivated by a manipulation drive. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  R. C. Tapasak Differences in expectancy-attribution patterns of cognitive components in male and female math performance , 1990 .

[33]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .