Landscape structure is a key driver of protist diversity along elevation gradients in the Swiss Alps

Context Human-induced changes in landscape structure are among the main causes of biodiversity loss. Despite their important contribution to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, microbes - and particularly protists - remain spatially understudied. Soil microbiota are most often driven by local soil properties, but the influence of the surrounding landscape is rarely assessed. Objectives We assessed the effect of landscape structure on soil protist alpha and beta diversity in meadows in the western Swiss Alps. Methods We sampled 178 plots along an elevation gradient representing a broad range of environmental conditions and land-use. We measured landscape structure around each plot at 5 successive spatial scales (i.e. neighbourhood windows of increasing radius, ranging from 100 to 2000 m around a plot). We investigated the changes of protist alpha and beta diversity as a function of landscape structure, local environmental conditions and geographic distance. Results Landscape structures played a key role for protist alpha and beta diversity. The percentage of meadows, forests, or open habitats had the highest influence among all landscape metrics. The importance of landscape structure was comparable to that of environmental conditions and spatial variables, and increased with the size of the neighbourhood window considered. Conclusions Our results suggest that dispersal from neighbouring habitats is a key driver of protist alpha and beta diversity which highlight the importance of landscape-scale assembly mechanisms for microbial diversity. Landscape structure emerges as a key driver of microbial communities which has profound implications for our understanding of the consequences of land-use change on soil microbial communities and their associated functions.

[1]  C. Mony,et al.  Landscape connectivity for the invisibles , 2022, Ecography.

[2]  T. Heger,et al.  Contribution of soil algae to the global carbon cycle. , 2022, The New phytologist.

[3]  Heidi K. Mod,et al.  Comparative analysis of diversity and environmental niches of soil bacterial, archaeal, fungal and protist communities reveal niche divergences along environmental gradients in the Alps , 2021, Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

[4]  T. Frøslev,et al.  Bacteria Respond Stronger Than Fungi Across a Steep Wood Ash-Driven pH Gradient , 2021, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change.

[5]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Editorial: Microbial Landscape Ecology: Highlights on the Invisible Corridors , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[6]  S. Louca,et al.  The rates of global bacterial and archaeal dispersal , 2021, The ISME Journal.

[7]  E. Poulin,et al.  Exploring the Microdiversity Within Marine Bacterial Taxa: Toward an Integrated Biogeography in the Southern Ocean , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[8]  Alexandros Stamatakis,et al.  Swarm v3: towards tera-scale amplicon clustering , 2021, Bioinform..

[9]  Heidi K. Mod,et al.  Predicting spatial patterns of soil bacteria under current and future environmental conditions , 2021, The ISME Journal.

[10]  Yuanda Song,et al.  Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production , 2021, Sustainability.

[11]  J. Kopecký,et al.  Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring. , 2020, Water research.

[12]  B. Bohannan,et al.  A Landscape of Opportunities for Microbial Ecology Research , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[13]  Ewa Gromny,et al.  Automated Production of a Land Cover/Use Map of Europe Based on Sentinel-2 Imagery , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[14]  M. Galetti,et al.  Dispersal of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: Evidence and Insights for Ecological Studies , 2020, Microbial Ecology.

[15]  Heidi K. Mod,et al.  Greater topoclimatic control of above‐ versus below‐ground communities , 2020, Global change biology.

[16]  A. Shakoor,et al.  Biogeochemical transformation of greenhouse gas emissions from terrestrial to atmospheric environment and potential feedback to climate forcing , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Julia A Gustavsen,et al.  Impact of a synthetic fungicide (fosetyl-Al and propamocarb-hydrochloride) and a biopesticide (Clonostachys rosea) on soil bacterial, fungal, and protist communities. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  E. Andrieu,et al.  Effects of Past and Present-Day Landscape Structure on Forest Soil Microorganisms , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[19]  É. Verrecchia,et al.  What are the most crucial soil variables for predicting the distribution of mountain plant species? A comprehensive study in the Swiss Alps , 2020, Journal of Biogeography.

[20]  K. Kormas,et al.  Taxa–area and distance–decay relationships of unicellular eukaryotes along an elevation gradient of mountainous freshwater ecosystems , 2019, Journal of Plankton Research.

[21]  D. Wall,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Soil Biodiversity in the Anthropocene , 2019, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Betts,et al.  The landscape ecology of pollination , 2019, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Forest edge effects on the mycorrhizal communities of the dual-mycorrhizal tree species Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[25]  E. Lara,et al.  Soil protist diversity in the Swiss western Alps is better predicted by topo-climatic than by edaphic variables , 2019, bioRxiv.

[26]  B. Jørgensen,et al.  Historical factors associated with past environments influence the 1 biogeography of thermophilic endospores in Arctic marine sediments 2 3 4 , 2019 .

[27]  V. Selonen,et al.  The effect of landscape structure on dispersal distances of the Eurasian red squirrel , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[28]  Muhammad Saleem,et al.  More Than the Sum of Its Parts: Microbiome Biodiversity as a Driver of Plant Growth and Soil Health , 2019, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.

[29]  K. Riitters,et al.  Pattern metrics for a transdisciplinary landscape ecology , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  G. Mace,et al.  Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[31]  T. Stoeck,et al.  Consistent patterns of high alpha and low beta diversity in tropical parasitic and free‐living protists , 2018, Molecular ecology.

[32]  P. Thrall,et al.  Spatio‐temporal connectivity and host resistance influence evolutionary and epidemiological dynamics of the canola pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans , 2018, Evolutionary applications.

[33]  Michaeline B. N. Albright,et al.  Function and functional redundancy in microbial systems , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[34]  J. R. van der Meer,et al.  Meta-scale mountain grassland observatories uncover commonalities as well as specific interactions among plant and non-rhizosphere soil bacterial communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[35]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Soil protist communities form a dynamic hub in the soil microbiome , 2017, The ISME Journal.

[36]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls , 2017 .

[37]  Robin J. Pakeman,et al.  Plant functional connectivity – integrating landscape structure and effective dispersal , 2017 .

[38]  E. Lara,et al.  Distribution patterns of soil microbial eukaryotes suggests widespread algivory by phagotrophic protists as an alternative pathway for nutrient cycling , 2017 .

[39]  M. Leibold,et al.  An integrative framework of coexistence mechanisms in competitive metacommunities , 2017 .

[40]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Spatial predictions at the community level: from current approaches to future frameworks , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[41]  Brandon M. Greenwell.  pdp: An R Package for Constructing Partial Dependence Plots , 2017, R J..

[42]  P. Vittoz,et al.  Uneven rate of plant turnover along elevation in grasslands , 2017, Alpine Botany.

[43]  S. Geisen.  The bacterial-fungal energy channel concept challenged by enormous functional versatility of soil protists , 2016 .

[44]  Ben Nichols,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Vsearch: a Versatile Open Source Tool for Metagenomics , 2022 .

[45]  Clémence Vannier,et al.  Patterns of landscape change in a rapidly urbanizing mountain region , 2016 .

[46]  S. Ramzan,et al.  Soil Microbiological Activity and Carbon Dynamics in the Current Climate Change Scenarios: A Review , 2016 .

[47]  J. R. van der Meer,et al.  Local Environmental Factors Drive Divergent Grassland Soil Bacterial Communities in the Western Swiss Alps , 2016, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[48]  J. Lennon,et al.  Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Scott Mitchell,et al.  Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity , 2015 .

[50]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  J. Dengler,et al.  Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis , 2014 .

[52]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Spatial predictions of land‐use transitions and associated threats to biodiversity: the case of forest regrowth in mountain grasslands , 2013 .

[53]  Stéphane Audic,et al.  The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote Small Sub-Unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[54]  V. Lenin,et al.  The United States of America , 2002, Government Statistical Agencies and the Politics of Credibility.

[55]  F. Essl,et al.  What determines Orthoptera species distribution and richness in temperate semi-natural dry grassland remnants? , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[56]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[57]  I. Bey,et al.  Modelling the effect of size on the aerial dispersal of microorganisms , 2012 .

[58]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  S. Salzberg,et al.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies , 2011, Bioinform..

[60]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  Rob Knight,et al.  Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[62]  E. Mitchell,et al.  Testate Amoebae and Nutrient Cycling with Particular Reference to Soils , 2010 .

[63]  T. Stoeck,et al.  Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[64]  Marcus Vinícius Vieira,et al.  Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[65]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[66]  W. Ludwig,et al.  SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  P. Peres‐Neto,et al.  The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. , 2006, Ecology.

[68]  J. V. Borre,et al.  Geographical variation in wolf spider dispersal behaviour is related to landscape structure , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  Noah Fierer,et al.  Predicting the temperature dependence of microbial respiration in soil: A continental‐scale analysis , 2006 .

[70]  T. Spiegelberger,et al.  Scale-dependent effects of land use on plant species richness of mountain grassland in the European Alps , 2006 .

[71]  M. C. Urban.  Maladaptation and Mass Effects in a Metacommunity: Consequences for Species Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[72]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Metacommunity influences on community richness at multiple spatial scales: a microcosm experiment. , 2006, Ecology.

[73]  James H. Brown,et al.  Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[74]  J. Fuhrman,et al.  Wide‐ranging abundances of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria in the world ocean revealed by epifluorescence microscopy and quantitative PCR , 2005 .

[75]  J. Overmann,et al.  Biogeography, Evolution, and Diversity of Epibionts in Phototrophic Consortia , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[76]  David Lonsdale,et al.  Tree diseases and landscape processes: the challenge of landscape pathology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[77]  D. H. Reed.  Extinction risk in fragmented habitats , 2004 .

[78]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[79]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices , 2002 .

[80]  Z. Elek,et al.  Ground beetles (Carabidae) and edge effect in oak-hornbeam forest and grassland transects , 2001 .

[81]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[82]  W R Pearson,et al.  Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[83]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .