Tracking Exceptional Human Capital Over Two Decades

Talent-search participants (286 males, 94 females) scoring in the top 0.01% on cognitive-ability measures were identified before age 13 and tracked over 20 years. Their creative, occupational, and life accomplishments are compared with those of graduate students (299 males, 287 females) enrolled in top-ranked U.S. mathematics, engineering, and physical science programs in 1992 and tracked over 10 years. By their mid-30s, the two groups achieved comparable and exceptional success (e.g., securing top tenure-track positions) and reported high and commensurate career and life satisfaction. College entrance exams administered to intellectually precocious youth uncover extraordinary potential for careers requiring creativity and scientific and technological innovation in the information age.

[1]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Meeting the Educational Needs of Special Populations , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Top 1 in 10,000: a 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  L. Cronbach,et al.  The Gifted Group in Later Maturity , 1995 .

[4]  D. Lubinski,et al.  States of excellence. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[5]  David S. Webster,et al.  Rating PhD Programs: What the NRC Report Says...and Doesn't Say. , 1996 .

[6]  A. Chandra,et al.  Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. , 1997, Vital and health statistics. Series 23, Data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

[7]  John C. Huber,et al.  Inventive productivity and the statistics of exceedances , 1999, Scientometrics.

[8]  D. Lubinski,et al.  The study of mathematically precocious youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. , 1994 .

[9]  J. Stanley,et al.  INEQUITY IN EQUITY: How "Equity" Can Lead to Inequity for High-Potential Students , 1996 .

[10]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Incorporating General Intelligence into Epidemiology and the Social Sciences. , 1997 .

[11]  Jane Zimmer Daniels,et al.  Gender Differences and Performance in Science , 2005, Science.

[12]  F. Galton.  Classification of men according to their natural gifts. , 1869 .

[13]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. , 1979 .

[14]  David Lubinski,et al.  Men and Women at Promise for Scientific Excellence: Similarity Not Dissimilarity , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  W. Coward,et al.  Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. , 1990 .

[16]  S. Assouline,et al.  A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. , 2004 .

[17]  M. Moore,et al.  Fertility of American women , 1977 .

[18]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. , 2002 .

[19]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Greatness: Who Makes History and Why , 1994 .

[20]  Peter D. Syverson.  Summary Report, 1982. Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. , 1983 .

[21]  B. Maher,et al.  Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change , 1996 .

[22]  David Lubinski,et al.  Sex Differences in Mathematical Reasoning Ability at Age 13: Their Status 20 Years Later , 2000, Psychological science.

[23]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Fertility of American women , 1977 .

[24]  D. Lubinski.  Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "'General intelligence,' objectively determined and measured". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Jack Gourman.  The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities , 1996 .

[26]  Kenneth S. Forman.  The Multiplier Effect , 2007 .

[27]  L. Humphreys,et al.  A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness , 1990 .

[28]  David Lubinski,et al.  Creativity and Occupational Accomplishments Among Intellectually Precocious Youths: An Age 13 to Age 33 Longitudinal Study. , 2005 .

[29]  Helping students learn only what they don't already know. , 2000 .

[30]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[31]  John C. Huber.  Invention and Inventivity as a Special Kind of Creativity, with Implications for General Creativity. , 1998 .