Fast computation of an optimal controller for large-scale adaptive optics.

The linear quadratic Gaussian regulator provides the minimum-variance control solution for a linear time-invariant system. For adaptive optics (AO) applications, under the hypothesis of a deformable mirror with instantaneous response, such a controller boils down to a minimum-variance phase estimator (a Kalman filter) and a projection onto the mirror space. The Kalman filter gain can be computed by solving an algebraic Riccati matrix equation, whose computational complexity grows very quickly with the size of the telescope aperture. This "curse of dimensionality" makes the standard solvers for Riccati equations very slow in the case of extremely large telescopes. In this article, we propose a way of computing the Kalman gain for AO systems by means of an approximation that considers the turbulence phase screen as the cropped version of an infinite-size screen. We demonstrate the advantages of the methods for both off- and on-line computational time, and we evaluate its performance for classical AO as well as for wide-field tomographic AO with multiple natural guide stars. Simulation results are reported.

[1]  Douglas P. Looze Minimum variance control structure for adaptive optics systems , 2006 .

[2]  C. Kulcsár,et al.  Wide field adaptive optics laboratory demonstration with closed-loop tomographic control. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control , 1974 .

[4]  Brent Ellerbroek Focus Issue: Adaptive Optics , 2006 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Optimal modal fourier-transform wavefront control. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  A Decomposition Approach to Distributed Control of Dynamic Deformable Mirrors , 2010 .

[7]  Ruth F. Curtain,et al.  A comparison between LQR control for a long string of SISO systems and LQR control of the infinite spatially invariant version , 2010, Autom..

[8]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  A Linear Systems Approach to Flow Control , 2007 .

[9]  C. Kulcsár,et al.  Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics. , 2006, Optics express.

[11]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Principles, limitations, and performance of multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[12]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Distributed control of spatially invariant systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Closed-loop stability and performance analysis of least-squares and minimum-variance control algorithms for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2005, Applied optics.

[14]  Curtis R Vogel,et al.  Fast optimal wavefront reconstruction for multi-conjugate adaptive optics using the Fourier domain preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm. , 2006, Optics express.

[15]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Fast reconstruction and prediction of frozen flow turbulence based on structured Kalman filtering. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  Mihailo R. Jovanovic,et al.  On the ill-posedness of certain vehicular platoon control problems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Curtis R Vogel,et al.  Preconditioned conjugate gradient wave-front reconstructors for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2003, Applied optics.