The Sci-hub Effect: Sci-hub downloads lead to more article citations

Citations are often used as a metric of the impact of scientific publications. Here, we examine how the number of downloads from Sci-hub as well as various characteristics of publications and their authors predicts future citations. Using data from 12 leading journals in economics, consumer research, neuroscience, and multidisciplinary research, we found that articles downloaded from Sci-hub were cited 1.72 times more than papers not downloaded from Sci-hub and that the number of downloads from Sci-hub was a robust predictor of future citations. Among other characteristics of publications, the number of figures in a manuscript consistently predicts its future citations. The results suggest that limited access to publications may limit some scientific research from achieving its full impact.

[1]  Juan C. Correa,et al.  Can scientific productivity impact the economic complexity of countries? , 2019, Scientometrics.

[2]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Preprints for the life sciences , 2016, Science.

[3]  M. Armstrong.  Opening Access to Research , 2015 .

[4]  Weishu Liu,et al.  A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers , 2020, Scientometrics.

[5]  Chris Arney,et al.  The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity , 2012 .

[6]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Philippe Jacquart,et al.  On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .

[8]  G. Bendezú-Quispe,et al.  Sci-Hub and medical practice: an ethical dilemma in Peru. , 2016, The Lancet. Global health.

[9]  John Seguin.  The future of access: How a mosaic of next-gen solutions will deliver more convenient access to more users , 2019, Inf. Serv. Use.

[10]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  Graphs in Statistical Analysis , 1973 .

[11]  Sven Van Poucke,et al.  Citations for Randomized Controlled Trials in Sepsis Literature: The Halo Effect Caused by Journal Impact Factor , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  Roxann Roberson-Nay,et al.  Constructing knowledge. The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[13]  Johan Bollen,et al.  How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Abdullah Abrizah,et al.  Sci‐Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front , 2018, Learn. Publ..

[15]  Thierry Lafouge,et al.  Relationships between consumption, publication and impact in French universities in a value perspective: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[16]  A. Lewbel,et al.  Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models , 2012 .

[17]  Patrick Thomas,et al.  Inventor team size as a predictor of the future citation impact of patents , 2015, Scientometrics.

[18]  Casey S Greene,et al.  Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature , 2018, eLife.

[19]  Christopher Rao,et al.  Graphs in Statistical Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  J. Bohannon.  Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone. , 2016, Science.

[21]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  The science of sharing and the sharing of science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Ajit Varki.  Scientific journals: Rename the impact factor. , 2017 .

[23]  M. McNutt.  My love-hate of Sci-Hub , 2016, Science.

[24]  Commercial publishers: What is to be done? , 2020 .

[25]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[26]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust regression and outlier detection , 1987 .

[27]  G. Heller,et al.  Flexible Regression and Smoothing: Using Gamlss in R , 2017 .

[28]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  The chaperone effect in scientific publishing , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  R. Law,et al.  What makes an article citable? , 2014 .

[31]  W. Strielkowski.  Will the rise of Sci-Hub pave the road for the subscription-based access to publishing databases? , 2017 .

[32]  Mario J. Valladares-Garrido,et al.  Use, knowledge, and perception of the scientific contribution of Sci-Hub in medical students: Study in six countries in Latin America , 2017, PloS one.

[33]  P. Hegarty,et al.  The Consequences of Predicting Scientific Impact in Psychology Using Journal Impact Factors , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[34]  B. Björk,et al.  Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[35]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact , 2016, Science.

[36]  Tânia Pinto,et al.  The impact of research output on economic growth by fields of science: a dynamic panel data analysis, 1980–2016 , 2020, Scientometrics.

[37]  David J Solomon,et al.  A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals , 2014, PeerJ.

[38]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Sören Krach,et al.  Journal Impact Factor Shapes Scientists’ Reward Signal in the Prospect of Publication , 2015, PloS one.