Performance measurement and performance management in OECD health systems

Health systems in OECD countries are under pressure to improve their performance. Against that background, this paper has three main aims: To compare concepts of the ‘performance’ of health care systems developed by the WHO and by the OECD, with ‘performance frameworks’ adopted in selected OECD countries.To compare the key indicators of performance derived from these proposed performance concepts. A secondary objective, here, is to try to identify new performance variables that might eventually be included in OECD Health Data.To compare and contrast the different performance management arrangements in the selected OECD countries, and to evaluate the extent to which there is evidence that new indicators and new institutions have been brought together successfully to improve performance itself. In order to achieve these aims, the paper reviews the performance frameworks and some of the performance indicators adopted recently by WHO, OECD, Australia, Canada, the UK and ... Toutes sortes de pressions s’exercent actuellement pour que les systemes de sante des pays de l’OCDE s’ameliorent. Dans ce contexte, on a adopte dans la presente etude trois principaux objectifs, a savoir : Comparer la definition de la performance des systemes de sante elabores par l’OMS et l’OCDE avec les cadres d’evaluation de la performance adoptes dans plusieurs pays de l’OCDE.Comparer les indicateurs cles de performance etablis a partir de ces definitions proposees. Un deuxieme objectif dans ce contexte, pourrait etre d’identifier de nouveaux parametres de performance qui pourraient eventuellement etre inclus dans Eco-Sante OCDE.Comparer les differents mecanismes de gestion de la performance dans les pays de l’OCDE retenus et faire ressortir les differences ; evaluer dans quelle mesure les faits indiquent que de nouveaux indicateurs et de nouvelles institutions ont ete mis en œuvre avec succes pour ameliorer la performance elle-meme. On a etudie les cadres ...

[1]  Ajay Tandon,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY OF NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS IN PRODUCING HEALTH : AN ANALYSIS OF 191 COUNTRIES , 2000 .

[2]  U.S. initiatives and approaches for outcomes and effectiveness research. , 1991, Health policy.

[3]  A. Epstein,et al.  Performance reports on quality--prototypes, problems, and prospects. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Jean-Marie Robine,et al.  The Health of Older Persons in OECD Countries: Is it Improving Fast Enough to Compensate for Population Ageing? , 1999 .

[5]  K. Davis,et al.  International health policy: common problems, alternative strategies. , 1999, Health affairs.

[6]  V. Navarro,et al.  Health indicators and the organization of health care systems in western Europe. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[7]  M Darby,et al.  Health care quality: from data to accountability , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[8]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  The American health care system--the movement for improved quality in health care. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  T. Brennan,et al.  Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. , 1999, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[10]  R. Santerre,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Health Care Systems: An Alternative Approach* , 1994 .

[11]  Martin Fletcher The Quality of Australian Health Care : Current Issues and Future Directions , 2000 .

[12]  S. Leatherman,et al.  Evolving quality in the new NHS: policy, process, and pragmatic considerations. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[13]  K. Donelan,et al.  Who has the best health care system? A second look. , 1995, Health affairs.

[14]  T. Brennan,et al.  INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS , 2008 .

[15]  M. Chassin,et al.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  J. Benbassat,et al.  Hospital readmissions as a measure of quality of health care: advantages and limitations. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  P. Cleary,et al.  What information do consumers want and need? , 1996, Health affairs.

[18]  A M Epstein,et al.  Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. , 1998, JAMA.

[19]  S Nutley,et al.  League Tables for Performance Improvement in Health Care , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[20]  M. Johantgen,et al.  Quality indicators using hospital discharge data: state and national applications. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[21]  J Gabbay,et al.  Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  J Hurst,et al.  Health spending and outcomes: trends in OECD countries, 1960-1998. , 2000, Health affairs.

[23]  A M Epstein,et al.  Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Elias Mossialos Citizens' views on health care systems in the 15 member states of the European Union. , 1997, Health economics.

[25]  S. Jencks Clinical performance measurement--a hard sell. , 2000, JAMA.

[26]  Z. Or DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH OUTCOMES IN INDUSTRIALISED COUNTRIES: A POOLED, CROSS-COUNTRY, TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[27]  J. Eskola,et al.  Health services resources and their relation to mortality from causes amenable to health care intervention: a cross-national study. , 1988, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  K. Lombarts,et al.  Quality management in medical specialties: the use of channels and dikes in improving health care in The Netherlands. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[29]  Frans F. H. Rutten,et al.  Equity in the finance and delivery of health care : an international perspective , 1992 .

[30]  E. Hannan,et al.  Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: what do New York state cardiologists think of it? , 1997, American heart journal.

[31]  G. Buckley MEASURING THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE , 1990 .

[32]  A. Epstein Public release of performance data: a progress report from the front. , 2000, JAMA.

[33]  C. Murray,et al.  A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[34]  R. M. Hartley,et al.  GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION IN MORTALITY FROM CONDITIONS AMENABLE TO MEDICAL INTERVENTION IN ENGLAND AND WALES , 1983, The Lancet.

[35]  K. Davis,et al.  The cost of health system change: public discontent in five nations. , 1999, Health affairs.

[36]  G. Bevan,et al.  European Community atlas of 'avoidable death'. , 1991 .

[37]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.

[38]  E L Hannan,et al.  Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  S. Hill,et al.  THE ROLE OF PATIENT SATISFACTION SURVEYS IN A NATIONAL APPROACH TO HOSPITAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT , 1995 .

[40]  D M Eddy,et al.  Performance measurement: problems and solutions. , 1998, Health affairs.

[41]  A M Epstein,et al.  Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards. , 1998, JAMA.

[42]  J. Mackenbach Health care expenditure and mortality from amenable conditions in the European Community. , 1991, Health policy.

[43]  Kjeld Møller Pedersen,et al.  The World Health Report 2000: dialogue of the deaf? , 2002, Health economics.