Correlation of Clinical Outcomes with the Prominent Indication of Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Multicenter Experience

Background: A paravalvular leak (PVL) is a complication following valve replacement, which may lead to heart failure and hemolysis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the clinical outcome after transcatheter PVL closure differs according to the prominent indication of the procedure (symptoms of heart failure or hemolysis). Methods: The data of consecutive patients who had transcatheter treatment for PVL between July 2011 and September 2022 in five Greek centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the technical, and clinical success rates with regards to the prominent indication of paravalvular leak closure. The secondary endpoints included the evaluation and comparison of the clinical and technical success in relation to the type of valve that was treated (aortic or mitral) as well as the survival analysis in relation to the closure indication and type of valve that was treated. Results: In total, 60 patients were retrospectively studied (39% men, mean age 69.5 ± 11 years). Regarding the primary outcomes, the technical success in patients mainly suffering from hemolysis was 86.1%, while in those presenting heart failure it was 95.8%, p = 0.387. Furthermore, the clinical success was 72.2% and 87.5% among hemolysis and heart failure patients, respectively, p = 0.210. During the follow-up period, the two-year survival rates were significantly better for patients treated for the aortic valve (78.94%) compared to those in the mitral position (48.78%), p = 0.014. In total, 25 patients died (41.7%) during 24 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates without any difference according to the prominent indication of closure.

[1]  N. Combes,et al.  Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry , 2022, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  G. Siasos,et al.  Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak. Multicenter experience and follow-up. , 2021, Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese.

[3]  F. Bauer,et al.  Mid-term Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure With the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device. , 2020, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Calvert,et al.  Percutaneous management of paravalvular leaks , 2019, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[5]  G. Siasos,et al.  Transapical closure of multiple mitral paravalvular leaks with dual device deployment through a single sheath: a Heart Team job. , 2018, Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese.

[6]  C. Rihal,et al.  Catheter-based closure of aortic and mitral paravalvular leaks: existing techniques and new frontiers , 2018, Expert review of medical devices.

[7]  Shiqiang Yu,et al.  Prognosis of Transcatheter Closure Compared with Surgical Repair of Paravalvular Leak after Prosthetic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Comparison , 2018, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

[8]  D. Hagler,et al.  Successful Percutaneous Mitral Paravalvular Leak Closure Is Associated With Improved Midterm Survival , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  D. Hagler,et al.  Transcatheter and Surgical Management of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Long-Term Outcomes. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. , 2017, European heart journal.

[11]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  [2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease]. , 2017, Kardiologia polska.

[12]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Clinical Trial Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Paravalvular Leaks in Surgical Prosthesis: An Expert Statement. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  A. Íñiguez,et al.  Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the SpanisH real-wOrld paravalvular LEaks closure (HOLE) registry. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Hagler,et al.  Techniques and Outcomes of Percutaneous Aortic Paravalvular Leak Closure. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Matthew J. Daniels,et al.  Percutaneous Device Closure of Paravalvular Leak: Combined Experience From the United Kingdom and Ireland. , 2016, Circulation.

[17]  Patrizio Lancellotti,et al.  The use of imaging in new transcatheter interventions: an EACVI review paper. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[18]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Ergelen,et al.  Early experience of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure using a novel Occlutech occluder. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  G. Filippatos,et al.  [Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease]. , 2013, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[21]  Jennifer Taylor,et al.  ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2012, European heart journal.

[22]  M. Leon,et al.  Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Itzhak Kronzon,et al.  Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.