The Impact of Scale, Recycling Boundary, and Type of Waste on Symbiosis and Recycling

Innovative waste recycling through industrial processes such as industrial and urban symbiosis has long been practiced and recently received much attention in the field of industrial ecology, with researchers making efforts to identify key contributing factors to successful industrial symbiosis. By analyzing 88 sample recycling projects in 23 eco‐towns in Japan, this article focuses on the factors of project scale, recycling boundary, and types of waste in relationship to environmental benefits and operational performance. The results showed that larger eco‐towns achieved more savings of virgin materials and higher stability in operation. Large‐scale projects tended to locate closer to the users of recycled products than did small‐scale projects. For treating similar types of waste, projects producing recycled products for special users (e.g., feedstock to a blast furnace for iron production) tended to locate closer to the users than those not producing for special users. The type of waste had a strong effect on the savings of virgin materials and recycling boundaries, while local factors had significant impacts on operational performance. The results also showed that agglomeration did not significantly contribute to the environmental benefits or operational performance of eco‐town projects. Another finding was that national agencies were helpful for facilitating cross‐prefecture transportation and long‐distance transaction of wastes. Implications of the findings are also discussed.

[1]  A. Colorni,et al.  The regional urban solid waste management system: A modelling approach , 1993 .

[2]  I. Costa,et al.  Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. , 2010 .

[3]  Geng Yong,et al.  On the industrial ecology potential in Asian Developing Countries , 2004 .

[4]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[5]  D. Lyons A Spatial Analysis of Loop Closing Among Recycling, Remanufacturing, and Waste Treatment Firms in Texas , 2007 .

[6]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  Applications of industrial ecology—an overview of the special issue , 2004 .

[7]  Han Shi,et al.  Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China , 2010 .

[8]  Shizuka Hashimoto,et al.  Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Horst A. Eiselt,et al.  Locating landfills - Optimization vs. reality , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Yong Geng,et al.  Evaluation of innovative municipal solid waste management through urban symbiosis: a case study of Kawasaki , 2010 .

[11]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Distance decay and coverage in facility location planning , 2006 .

[12]  Pierre Desrochers,et al.  Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter‐firm recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications , 2002 .

[13]  David Gibbs,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Regional Development: Eco-Industrial Development as Cluster Policy , 2008 .

[14]  David Gibbs,et al.  Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development , 2007 .

[15]  M. Chertow,et al.  Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[17]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  A LOCATIONAL MODEL FOR THE SITE SELECTION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES WITH TRAFFIC CONGESTION CONSTRAINTS , 1995 .

[18]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The Changing Metabolism of Cities , 2007 .

[19]  Isabelle Thomas,et al.  Locating a Community Recycling Center within a Residential Area: A Belgian Case Study , 2002 .

[20]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[21]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[22]  N. Jacobsen Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects , 2006 .

[23]  Tsuyoshi Fujita,et al.  Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town Program 1997-2006. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[25]  Braden Allenby,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Sustainable Engineering , 2009 .

[26]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems A Social Network Approach , 2009 .

[27]  Thomas Ott,et al.  The industrial region as a promising unit for eco-industrial development—reflections, practical experience and establishment of innovative instruments to support industrial ecology , 2004 .

[28]  P. Strachan,et al.  Management and Policy Aspects of Industrial Ecology: An Emerging Research Agenda , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model , 2004 .

[30]  Pierre Desrochers,et al.  Regional development and inter-industry recycling linkages: some historical perspectives , 2002 .

[31]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Empirical analysis of eco-industrial development in China , 2007 .

[32]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  A multicriteria facility location model for municipal solid waste management in North Greece , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..