Evaluating Faculty Staff: An Application of Group MCDM Based on the Fuzzy AHP Approach

Faculty evaluation is a crucial component of human resource management in higher education institutions. One of the main issues of evaluation is how to assess overall performance of faculty members based on multiple criteria. In this paper, we propose a faculty evaluation index system by employing group Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) based on fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Specifically, after determining the criteria and attributes, the evaluation hierarchy is established. The weights of criteria and attributes are then calculated by the fuzzy AHP method. Employing the fuzzy AHP in group decision making facilitates a consensus of decision-makers and reduces uncertainty in decision making. The evaluation process can then be conducted by the use of the multiple criteria measurement method. A case application is also used to illustrate the proposed framework. The application of this framework can make the evaluation more scientific, accurate, and objective. It is expected that this work may serve as an assistance tool for managers of higher education institutions in improving the educational quality level.

[1]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[2]  Metin Celik,et al.  Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  R. Saneifard A METHOD FOR DEFUZZIFICATION BY WEIGHTED DISTANCE , 2009 .

[4]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[5]  A. Kaufmann,et al.  Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic : theory and applications , 1986 .

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[7]  Viet Hung Khuat Traffic management in motorcycle dependent cities , 2007 .

[8]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[9]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Jamal Shahrabi,et al.  PROJECT SELECTION BY USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS TECHNIQUE , 2007 .

[11]  Jui-Kuei Chen,et al.  A Pro-performance appraisal system for the university , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model , 2003, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  E. Lee,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events , 1988 .

[16]  Shetab Boushehri Sayed Nader,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL METHODOLOGY FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS SELECTION , 2011 .

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[18]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for measuring the possibility of successful knowledge management , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Shyh-Hwang Lee,et al.  Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[21]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Fuzzy Hierarchy Analysis of Gravel Pile Stability , 2013 .