Assessment of Polyacrylamide Based Co-Polymers Enhanced by Functional Group Modifications with Regards to Salinity and Hardness

This research aims to test four new polymers for their stability under high salinity/high hardness conditions for their possible use in polymer flooding to improve oil recovery from hydrocarbon reservoirs. The four sulfonated based polyacrylamide co-polymers were FLOCOMB C7035; SUPERPUSHER SAV55; THERMOASSOCIATIF; and AN132 VHM which are basically sulfonated polyacrylamide copolymers of AM (acrylamide) with AMPS (2-Acrylamido-2-Methylpropane Sulfonate). AN132 VHM has a molecular weight of 9–11 million Daltons with 32 mol % degree of sulfonation. SUPERPUSHER SAV55 mainly has about 35 mol % sulfonation degree and a molecular weight of 9–11 million Daltons. FLOCOMB C7035, in addition, has undergone post-hydrolysis step to increase polydispersity and molecular weight above 18 million Daltons but it has a sulfonation degree much lower than 32 mol %. THERMOASSOCIATIF has a molecular weight lower than 12 million Daltons and a medium sulfonation degree of around 32 mol %, and also contains LCST (lower critical solution temperature) type block, which is responsible for its thermoassociative characteristics. This paper discusses the rheological behavior of these polymers in aqueous solutions (100–4500 ppm) with NaCl (0.1–10 wt %) measured at 25 °C. The effect of hardness was investigated by preparing a CaCl2-NaCl solution of same ionic strength as the 5 wt % of NaCl. In summary, it can be concluded that the rheological behavior of the newly modified co-polymers was in general agreement to the existing polymers, except that THERMOASSOCIATIF polymers showed unique behavior, which could possibly make them a better candidate for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) application in high salinity conditions. The other three polymers, on the other hand, are better candidates for EOR applications in reservoirs containing high divalent ions. These results are expected to be helpful in selecting and screening the polymers for an EOR application.

[1]  S. M. Mahmood,et al.  Effect of Aging, Antioxidant, and Mono- and Divalent Ions at High Temperature on the Rheology of New Polyacrylamide-Based Co-Polymers , 2017, Polymers.

[2]  Yining Wu,et al.  Design and Study of a Novel Thermal-Resistant and Shear-Stable Amphoteric Polyacrylamide in High-Salinity Solution , 2017, Polymers.

[3]  D. Wen,et al.  Rheological Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Seeded by Nanoparticles , 2017 .

[4]  Yujun Feng,et al.  Comparative Studies on Enhanced Oil Recovery: Thermoviscosifying Polymer Versus Polyacrylamide , 2017 .

[5]  S. M. Mahmood,et al.  Experimental investigation of the effect of different process variables on the viscosity of sulfonated polyacrylamide copolymers , 2017, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[6]  Zhiyu Huang,et al.  Self-assembly properties of a temperature- and salt-tolerant amphoteric hydrophobically associating polyacrylamide , 2016 .

[7]  R. Al-Maamari,et al.  Improving Polymer Flooding Efficiency in Oman Oil Fields , 2016 .

[8]  N. Gaillard,et al.  Selection of Customized Polymers to Enhance Oil Recovery from High Temperature Reservoirs , 2015 .

[9]  P. Shuler,et al.  Theoretical studies of hydrolysis and stability of polyacrylamide polymers , 2015 .

[10]  K. Spildo,et al.  Effect of Charge Distribution on the Viscosity and Viscoelastic Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide , 2015 .

[11]  N. Gaillard,et al.  Rheological Properties of Stimuli-Responsive Polymers in Solution to Improve the Salinity and Temperature Performances of Polymer-Based Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Technologies , 2015 .

[12]  R. Advíncula,et al.  Stimuli-Responsive Polymers and their Potential Applications in Oil-Gas Industry , 2015 .

[13]  K. Lee,et al.  Temperature-dependent viscosity model of HPAM polymer through high-temperature reservoirs , 2014 .

[14]  I. Tan,et al.  Empirical Correlations for Viscosity of Polyacrylamide Solutions with the Effects of Temperature and Shear Rate. II , 2014 .

[15]  A. Rabiee,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Acrylamide-Based Anionic Copolymer and Investigation of Solution Properties , 2014 .

[16]  Zhao Jianhui,et al.  Adsorption behavior of cocamidopropyl betaine under conditions of high temperature and high salinity , 2014 .

[17]  I. Tan,et al.  Empirical Correlations for Viscosity of Polyacrylamide Solutions with the Effects of Salinity and Hardness , 2014 .

[18]  A. Alajmi,et al.  Improving polymer flood performance in high salinity reservoirs , 2014 .

[19]  F. Torabi,et al.  Rheological Assessment of the Elasticity of Polymers for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery , 2013 .

[20]  P. Zitha,et al.  Novel Insight into Polymer Injectivity for Polymer Flooding , 2013 .

[21]  T. Al-Fariss,et al.  The effect of polymer concentration and temperature on the rheological behavior of metallocene linear low density polyethylene (mLLDPE) solutions , 2011 .

[22]  D. Boersma,et al.  Pushing the envelope for polymer flooding towards high-temperature and high-salinity reservoirs with polyacrylamide based ter-polymers , 2011 .

[23]  A. Alajmi,et al.  Enhancing Recovery in High Salinity Oil Reservoirs through Optimized Polymer Flood , 2011, International Symposium on Information Processing and Trusted Computing.

[24]  K. Ojha,et al.  Effects of Alkali, Salts, and Surfactant on Rheological Behavior of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Solutions † , 2010 .

[25]  A. Skauge,et al.  Viscosity Study of Salt Tolerant Polymers , 2010 .

[26]  Haiyan Zhang,et al.  Which One Is More Important in Chemical Flooding for Enhanced Court Heavy Oil Recovery, Lowering Interfacial Tension or Reducing Water Mobility? , 2010 .

[27]  R. Seright,et al.  Stability of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamides at Elevated Temperatures in the Absence of Divalent Cations , 2010 .

[28]  S. Syrjälä,et al.  On the measurement and modeling of viscosity of polymers at low temperatures , 2008 .

[29]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Selection and Screening of Polymers for Enhanced-Oil Recovery , 2008 .

[30]  Kon Wyatt,et al.  Laboratory Aspect of Chemical EOR Processes Evaluation for Malaysian Oilfields , 2006 .

[31]  Timothy E. Long,et al.  Electrospinning of linear homopolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate): exploring relationships between fiber formation, viscosity, molecular weight and concentration in a good solvent , 2005 .

[32]  R. Merrill,et al.  Evaluation of IOR Potential within Kuwait , 2004 .

[33]  Laosheng Wu,et al.  Effects of soil and water properties on anionic polyacrylamide Sorption , 2002 .

[34]  I. Teraoka.  Polymer solutions: An introduction to physical properties , 2002 .

[35]  J. Travas-sejdic,et al.  Study of free‐radical copolymerization of acrylamide with 2‐acrylamido‐2‐methyl‐1‐propane sulphonic acid , 2000 .

[36]  M. Ghannam.  Rheological properties of aqueous polyacrylamide/NaCl solutions , 1999 .

[37]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Polymer-improved oil recovery , 1991 .

[38]  P. Carreau,et al.  Rheological Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Solutions , 1987 .

[39]  A. Moradi-araghi,et al.  Hydrolysis and Precipitation of Polyacrylamides in Hard Brines at Elevated Temperatures , 1984 .

[40]  Miklos T. Szabo,et al.  An Evaluation of Water-Soluble Polymers For Secondary Oil Recovery - Parts 1 and 2 , 1979 .