Xampling at the Rate of Innovation

We address the problem of recovering signals from samples taken at their rate of innovation. Our only assumption is that the sampling system is such that the parameters defining the signal can be stably determined from the samples, a condition that lies at the heart of every sampling theorem. Consequently, our analysis subsumes previously studied nonlinear acquisition devices and nonlinear signal classes. In particular, we do not restrict attention to memoryless nonlinear distortions or to union-of-subspace models. This allows treatment of various finite-rate-of-innovation (FRI) signals that were not previously studied, including, for example, continuous phase modulation transmissions. Our strategy relies on minimizing the error between the measured samples and those corresponding to our signal estimate. This least-squares (LS) objective is generally nonconvex and might possess many local minima. Nevertheless, we prove that under the stability hypothesis, any optimization method designed to trap a stationary point of the LS criterion necessarily converges to the true solution. We demonstrate our approach in the context of recovering pulse streams in settings that were not previously treated. Furthermore, in situations for which other algorithms are applicable, we show that our method is often preferable in terms of noise robustness.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Innovation Rate Sampling of Pulse Streams With Application to Ultrasound Imaging , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[3]  W. Frank Sampling requirements for Volterra system identification , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[4]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  A minimum squared-error framework for generalized sampling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Compressed Sensing of Analog Signals , 2011, Compressed Sensing.

[6]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  From Theory to Practice: Sub-Nyquist Sampling of Sparse Wideband Analog Signals , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[7]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[8]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  Matrix pencil method for estimating parameters of exponentially damped/undamped sinusoids in noise , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Low Rate Sampling of Pulse Streams with Application to Ultrasound Imaging , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Signal Acquisition and Processing in Union of Subspaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Optimization techniques in modern sampling theory , 2010, Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications.

[12]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Nonlinear and Nonideal Sampling Revisited , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications , 2010 .

[14]  I. W. Sandberg On the properties of some systems that distort signals — II , 1963 .

[15]  C.-E. Sundberg,et al.  Continuous phase modulation , 1986, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  B-SPLINE SIGNAL PROCESSING: PART I-THEORY , 1993 .

[17]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Multichannel Sampling of Pulse Streams at the Rate of Innovation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  Nonuniform Sampling and Reconstruction in Shift-Invariant Spaces , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[19]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Beyond bandlimited sampling , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[21]  Qiyu Sun,et al.  Frames in spaces with finite rate of innovation , 2008, Adv. Comput. Math..

[22]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Nonlinear and Nonideal Sampling: Theory and Methods , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Michael Unser,et al.  B-spline signal processing. I. Theory , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Extrapolation and Interpolation) , 2022 .

[25]  Michael Unser,et al.  A general sampling theory for nonideal acquisition devices , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[26]  Thomas Blumensath,et al.  Sampling and Reconstructing Signals From a Union of Linear Subspaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[27]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communications: Optimization techniques in modern sampling theory , 2009 .

[28]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Nonlinear and Non-Ideal Sampling : Theory and Methods , 2008 .

[29]  Minh N. Do,et al.  A Theory for Sampling Signals from a Union of Subspaces , 2022 .

[30]  A. Aldroubi Oblique projections in atomic spaces , 1996 .

[31]  I. W. Sandberg,et al.  Notes on PQ theorems , 1994 .

[32]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Blind Multiband Signal Reconstruction: Compressed Sensing for Analog Signals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[33]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Xampling: Analog to digital at sub-Nyquist rates , 2009, IET Circuits Devices Syst..

[34]  W. L. Miranker,et al.  The recovery of distorted band-limited signals , 1961 .

[35]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Time-Delay Estimation From Low-Rate Samples: A Union of Subspaces Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[36]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Performance Bounds and Design Criteria for Estimating Finite Rate of Innovation Signals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[37]  Elias Masry The recovery of distorted band-limited stochastic processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[38]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Sampling and reconstruction of signals with finite rate of innovation in the presence of noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[39]  Yonina C. Eldar Sampling with Arbitrary Sampling and Reconstruction Spaces and Oblique Dual Frame Vectors , 2003 .

[40]  A. Aldroubi,et al.  Sampling procedures in function spaces and asymptotic equivalence with shannon's sampling theory , 1994 .

[41]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Sampling signals with finite rate of innovation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..