Dynamic social media affiliations among UK politicians

Abstract Inter-personal affiliations and coalitions are an important part of politicians’ behaviour, but are often difficult to observe. Since an increasing amount of political communication now occurs online, data from online interactions may offer a new toolkit to study ties between politicians; however, the methods by which robust insights can be derived from online data require further development, especially around the dynamics of political social networks. We develop a novel method for tracking the evolution of community structures, referred to as ‘multiplex community affiliation clustering’ (MCAC), and use it to study the online social networks of Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the United Kingdom. Social interaction networks are derived from social media (Twitter) communication over an eventful 17-month period spanning the UK General Election in 2015 and the UK Referendum on membership of the European Union in 2016. We find that the social network structure linking MPs and MEPs evolves over time, with distinct communities forming and re-forming, driven by party affiliations and political events. Without including any information about time in our model, we nevertheless find that the evolving social network structure shows multiple persistent and recurring states of affiliation between politicians, which align with content states derived from topic analysis of tweet text. These findings show that the dominant state of partisan segregation can be challenged by major political events, ideology, and intra-party tension that transcend party affiliations.

[1]  Graeme Baxter,et al.  Does Scotland ‘like’ This? Social Media Use by Political Parties and Candidates in Scotland during the 2010 UK General Election Campaign , 2012 .

[2]  B. Lauderdale,et al.  Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech , 2016, Political Analysis.

[3]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[4]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[5]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[7]  Arthur Spirling,et al.  The Rights and Wrongs of Roll Calls , 2006, Government and Opposition.

[8]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Yannis Theocharis,et al.  A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets? The Consequences of Citizens’ Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting with Party Candidates , 2016 .

[10]  P. Mucha,et al.  Party Polarization in Congress: A Social Networks Approach , 2009, 0907.3509.

[11]  Michelangelo Puliga,et al.  Voting Behavior, Coalitions and Government Strength through a Complex Network Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Kenneth Benoit,et al.  Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament , 2016 .

[13]  Chun Liu,et al.  Social Influence Bias : A Randomized Experiment , 2014 .

[14]  Igor Mozetic,et al.  Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  J. Cook,et al.  Are American Politicians as Partisan Online as They are Offline? Twitter Networks in the U.S. Senate and Maine State Legislature , 2016 .

[18]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Partisan asymmetries in online political activity , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[19]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change , 2015 .

[20]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning: The Impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 General Election , 2010 .

[22]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[23]  Robert Ladrech,et al.  Europeanization and Political Parties , 2002 .

[24]  S. Hix,et al.  Scaling the Commons: Using MPs’ Left-Right Self-Placement and Voting Divisions to Map the British Parliament, 1997-2005 , 2010 .

[25]  Andreas Jungherr.  Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review , 2016 .

[26]  Peter Mair,et al.  Political Parties and Party Systems , 2008 .

[27]  Françoise Boucek,et al.  Rethinking Factionalism , 2009 .

[28]  Alan Ware,et al.  Political Parties and Party Systems , 1995 .

[29]  Nic Newman,et al.  #UKelection2010, mainstream media and the role of the internet: how social and digital media affected the business of politics and journalism , 2010 .

[30]  Maria Laura Sudulich,et al.  The determinants and dynamics of Twitter-based interactions among candidates , 2015 .

[31]  Igor Mozetic,et al.  Retweet networks of the European Parliament: evaluation of the community structure , 2016, Applied Network Science.

[32]  D. Lazer.  Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future , 2011, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[33]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[34]  Michael Kellermann,et al.  Estimating Ideal Points in the British House of Commons Using Early Day Motions , 2012 .

[35]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[36]  M. Broersma,et al.  BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS , 2012 .

[37]  G. Sartori.  Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1977 .

[38]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[39]  Robert Marshall-Andrews,et al.  UK OC OK ? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the U . K . House of Commons , 2006 .

[40]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies , 2010, Sociological methods & research.