Exploring the topology of the plausible: Fs/QCA counterfactual analysis and the plausible fit of unobserved organizational configurations

Few ideas have been more persistently central in both strategy and organization research than the concept of fit (Child, 1974; Miller, 1992; Parker and Van Witteloostuijn, 2010; Sinha and Van de Ven, 2005). Beyond its theoretical appeal, the prominence of the idea of fit in the management literature is also due to its powerful practical applications. In fact, the conceptual frameworks developed around this idea have offered a systematic approach that can be applied to any organization to uncover areas of misalignment that may affect performance goals (Tushman and O’Reilly, 2002). Since early contingency approaches, research has focused on a two-dimensional notion of fit, investigating, for example, the internal fit between strategy and structure (e.g. Chandler, 1962; Miller, 1992) or the external fit between structure and contextual factors (e.g. Lawrence and Lorsch, 1967) as bivariate relationships. Drawing on these fundamental intuitions, in the last two decades scholars have developed the notion of configurational fit, defined here as ‘the systemic relationship among multiple sets of elements, either internal or external to an organization’ (cf. Drazin and Van de Ven, 1985; Meyer et al., 1993; Siggelkow, 2002; Snow et al., 2005). More precisely, configurational fit captures the multidimensionality and complexity of the relationships linking organizational elements (such as organizational structures, integration mechanisms and people); the attributes of a firm’s strategy (such as degree of diversification, vertical integration, customer orientation); and environmental dimensions (such as market volatility, technological dynamism, regulation and environmental munificence). An emergent and promising stream of literature has also recently expanded the set of factors that can systemically interact in a configuration, including informal organizational elements (Gulati and Puranam, 2009; Soda and Zaheer, 2012), showing how the multidimensional interaction among these factors can generate positive or detrimental effects on performance. 10310.1177/1476127012452826Soda and FurnariStrategic Organization 2012

[1]  C. Booth Does history matter in strategy? The possibilities and problems of counterfactual analysis , 2003 .

[2]  A. Zaheer,et al.  A network perspective on organizational architecture: performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization , 2012 .

[3]  Walter Fontana,et al.  The Topology of the Possible , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Designing Work Within and Between Organizations , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[5]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[6]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[7]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[8]  J. Child MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART I , 1974 .

[9]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[10]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Configurational Comparative Methods , 2011 .

[11]  A. Grandori Methodological Options for an Integrated Perspective on Organization , 2001 .

[12]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Social Science Data , 2010 .

[13]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  In Defense of Strategy as Design , 2000 .

[14]  Santi Furnari,et al.  A Chemistry of Organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design , 2008 .

[15]  Huseyin Leblebici Allocation of Rights and the Organization of Transactions: Elements of a Generative Approach to Organizing , 2000 .

[16]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[17]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[19]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Strategic Management Research: Current State and Future Prospects , 2011 .

[20]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[21]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[22]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[23]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[24]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Problem of Emergence , 2012 .

[25]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2006 .

[26]  Karl Popper The World of Parmenides: Essays on the Presocratic Enlightenment , 1998 .

[27]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  The seeking of strategy where it is not: Towards a theory of strategy absence , 1995 .

[28]  James D. Thompson On Building an Administrative Science , 1956 .

[29]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research , 2007 .

[31]  A. Grandori,et al.  Types of Complementarity, Combinative Organization Forms and Structural Heterogeneity: Beyond Discrete Structural Alternatives , 2009 .

[32]  M. Porter,et al.  Contextuality Within Activity Systems and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[33]  A. Grandori A rational heuristic model of economic decision making , 2010 .

[34]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[35]  Rodolphe Durand,et al.  Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage , 2009 .

[36]  Alexander Hicks,et al.  The programmatic emergence of the social security state , 1995 .

[37]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  A configurational approach to the integration of strategy and organization research , 2005 .

[38]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[39]  Santi Furnari,et al.  Modeling Multidimensional Fit through Boolean Algebra: New Methods for Combinative Organization Design , 2007 .

[40]  Anna Grandori,et al.  A Relational Approach to Organization Design , 2006 .

[41]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[42]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[43]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives , 1996 .

[44]  Subodh P. Kulkarni,et al.  Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal , 1998 .

[45]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[46]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[47]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Evolution toward Fit , 2002 .

[48]  Simon C. Parker,et al.  A General Framework for Estimating Multidimensional Contingency Fit , 2010, Organ. Sci..