Improving garment fit and function through ease quantification

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical model for considering ease numerically in the clothing pattern. Classifying the pattern as a geometric Cartesian coordinate system, this model proposes the need to quantify the partly coincident variables of ease, which will enable greater control over garment fit and function, using traditional or CAD/CAM methods.Design/methodology/approach – The principles of pattern/garment dimensions are considered with support from analysis of literature and contributing factors to the variables of ease are categorised. These principles support a proposed theoretical model for considering pattern/garment dimensions, in the numeric format that they exist within the context of pattern construction.Findings – Pattern construction occurs in a 2D Cartesian coordinate system, guided by body dimensions and ease. This can be modelled in the form of an algorithm relating to the placement of cardinal points defining the pattern outline. Recognition of the numerica...

[1]  Judith Rasband,et al.  Fabulous fit : speed fitting and alteration , 2006 .

[2]  Zhang Wei-yuan,et al.  Prototype garment pattern flattening based on individual 3D virtual dummy , 2007 .

[3]  Yves Chiricota.  Three‐dimensional garment modelling using attribute mapping , 2003 .

[4]  Alison Beazley.  Size and fit: The development of size charts for clothing — Part 3 , 1999 .

[5]  S P Ashdown,et al.  Perception testing of apparel ease variation. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  L. Dekker,et al.  A Comparison of Women's Sizing by 3D Electronic Scanning and Traditional Anthropometry , 2000 .

[7]  Alison Beazley.  Size and fit: Procedures in undertaking a survey of body measurements , 1997 .

[8]  Winifred Aldrich,et al.  Metric pattern cutting for women's wear , 2008 .

[9]  Xianyi Zeng,et al.  A new method of ease allowance generation for personalization of garment design , 2008 .

[10]  Dubravko Rogale,et al.  Systematic representation and application of a 3D computer‐aided garment construction method: Part II: spatial transformation of 3D garment cut segments , 2006 .

[11]  W. Aldrich.  1 – History of sizing systems and ready-to-wear garments , 2007 .

[12]  Wm. Kirk,et al.  Fundamental Relationship of Fabric Extensibility to Anthropometric Requirements and Garment Performance , 1966 .

[13]  Liu Chi,et al.  Body scanning of dynamic posture , 2006 .

[14]  Jintu Fan,et al.  Clothing appearance and fit , 2004 .

[15]  Ann Haggar.  Pattern Cutting for Lingerie, Beachwear and Leisurewear , 1991 .

[16]  Tae Jin Kang,et al.  Development of three‐dimensional apparel CAD system: Part II: prediction of garment drape shape , 2000 .

[17]  Tae Jin Kang,et al.  Development of three‐dimensional apparel CAD system , 2000 .

[18]  Thong‐Hwee Koh,et al.  Communications: an analysis of the apparel pattern‐making process , 1995 .

[19]  Terry Bond,et al.  Computer-Aided Pattern Design and Product Development , 2003 .

[20]  Peter Brown,et al.  Three-Dimensional Pattern Drafting , 1990 .

[21]  Chin‐Man Chen,et al.  Fit evaluation within the made‐to‐measure process , 2007 .

[22]  Karen L. LaBat,et al.  Exploring the Relationships of Grading, Sizing, and Anthropometric Data , 2005 .

[23]  Simeon Gill,et al.  Determination of Functional Ease Allowances using anthropometric measurement for application in pattern construction , 2009 .

[24]  Gerry Cooklin.  Pattern cutting for women's outerwear , 1994 .

[25]  Peter Brown,et al.  Three-Dimensional Pattern Drafting , 1990 .

[26]  Tom Cassidy,et al.  The influence of woven stretch fabric properties on garment design and pattern construction , 2002 .

[27]  Janet Ward,et al.  Pattern Cutting and Making Up , 1980 .

[28]  L. Hunter,et al.  Clothing Appearance and Fit: Science and Technology , 2004 .

[29]  Simeon Gill,et al.  Determination of ease allowances included in pattern construction methods , 2009 .