Viewing nanocrystalline TiO2 photoelectrodes as three-dimensional electrodes: Effect of the electrolyte upon the photocurrent efficiency

Nanocrystalline TiO2 films are widely investigated both as photoelectrodes to carry out photocatalytic reactions under band-gap near-UV illumination or, alternatively, as an electronically conducting matrix of dye-sensitised electrodes as a part of a liquid-junction solar photovoltaic cell. The main features of these photoelectrodes are: (i) significant thickness to allow effective absorption of incident light—the films consist typically of 100–1000 superimposed layers of individual nanoparticles; (ii) large porosity—ca. 50% of the film volume is normally filled with electrolyte; (iii) large surface-to-volume ratio resulting from the small size of TiO2 nanoparticles (with diameters in the range of 10–30 nm) forming the film. This work re-examines the question of charge and mass transport in nanocrystalline titanium dioxide electrodes which are among the major factors affecting the efficiency of TiO2-based dye-sensitised solar cells and photocatalytic devices. In contrast to most of the reports published in the literature, which analyse of the behaviour of such films under transient conditions, we focus here on the steady-state operation of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrodes, directly relevant to the efficiency of cells used in real-world applications. Understanding of the charge and mass transport across these nanocrystalline films is greatly facilitated by considering them as three-dimensional electrodes including two coincidental, superimposed continua, i.e., the solid matrix that conducts electrons towards the back contact and the electrolyte—an ionic conductor carrying another part of the current through the pores of the nanostructured film. It is shown that the composition and conductivity of the chosen electrolyte and, in particular, the nature of the ionic species which act as hole scavengers or redox mediators largely affect the current distribution within the film and thus the final photon-to-current conversion efficiency of the photoelectrodes.

[1]  Laurence M. Peter,et al.  Dynamic Response of Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells: Characterization by Intensity-Modulated Photocurrent Spectroscopy , 1997 .

[2]  J. Bisquert.  Comment on “Diffusion Impedance and Space Charge Capacitance in the Nanoporous Dye-Sensitized Electrochemical Solar Cell” and “Electronic Transport in Dye-Sensitized Nanoporous TiO2 Solar CellsComparison of Electrolyte and Solid-State Devices” , 2003 .

[3]  Greg P. Smestad,et al.  Testing of dye sensitized TiO2 solar cells I: Experimental photocurrent output and conversion efficiencies , 1994 .

[4]  Fei Cao,et al.  ELECTRON TRANSPORT IN POROUS NANOCRYSTALLINE TIO2 PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS , 1996 .

[5]  J. Augustynski,et al.  Highly selective photo-oxidation reactions at nanocrystalline TiO2 film electrodes , 1994 .

[6]  Arthur J. Frank,et al.  CHARGE RECOMBINATION IN DYE-SENSITIZED NANOCRYSTALLINE TIO2 SOLAR CELLS , 1997 .

[7]  Jean-François Guillemoles,et al.  Nature of Photovoltaic Action in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells , 2000 .

[8]  Takayuki Kitamura,et al.  Roles of electrolytes on charge recombination in dye-sensitized TiO(2) solar cells (2): the case of solar cells using cobalt complex redox couples. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  Francis Levy,et al.  Electrical and optical properties of TiO2 anatase thin films , 1994 .

[10]  Ralph E. White,et al.  Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry , 1981 .

[11]  T. Kitamura,et al.  Quasi-Solid-State Dye-Sensitized TiO2 Solar Cells: Effective Charge Transport in Mesoporous Space Filled with Gel Electrolytes Containing Iodide and Iodine , 2001 .

[12]  P. Delahay,et al.  Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering , 1964 .

[13]  Takayuki Kitamura,et al.  Role of electrolytes on charge recombination in dye-sensitized TiO(2) solar cell (1): the case of solar cells using the I(-)/I(3)(-) redox couple. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Adrian C. Fisher,et al.  Intensity Dependence of the Back Reaction and Transport of Electrons in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solar Cells , 2000 .

[15]  John Burgess,et al.  Metal Ions in Solution , 1978 .

[16]  Anders Hagfeldt,et al.  Theoretical Models for the Action Spectrum and the Current-Voltage Characteristics of Microporous Semiconductor Films in Photoelectrochemical Cells , 1994 .

[17]  R. Schropp,et al.  Charge Dynamics following Dye Photoinjection into a TiO2 Nanocrystalline Network , 1998 .

[18]  P. Würfel,et al.  Dependence of the Photocurrent Conversion Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells on the Incident Light Intensity , 2000 .

[19]  M. Grätzel,et al.  On the relevance of mass transport in thin layer nanocrystalline photoelectrochemical solar cells , 1996 .

[20]  J. Newman,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Current Distribution in Porous Electrodes , 1962 .

[21]  Ashraful Islam,et al.  Highly efficient quasi-solid state dye-sensitized solar cell with ion conducting polymer electrolyte , 2004 .

[22]  J. Augustynski,et al.  CHARGE CARRIER TRANSPORT IN NANOSTRUCTURED ANATASE TIO2 FILMS ASSISTED BY THE SELF-DOPING OF NANOPARTICLES , 1998 .

[23]  Valery Shklover,et al.  Nanocrystalline titanium oxide electrodes for photovoltaic applications , 2005 .

[24]  Jenny Nelson,et al.  Continuous-time random-walk model of electron transport in nanocrystalline TiO 2 electrodes , 1999 .

[25]  D. M. Eagles.  Polar modes of lattice vibration and polaron coupling constants in rutile (TiO2) , 1964 .

[26]  T. Kubo,et al.  Modeling of photocurrent in dye-sensitized solar cells fabricated with PVDF-HFP-based gel-type polymeric solid electrolyte , 2006 .

[27]  H. Ozaki,et al.  Computer Simulations of Charge Transport in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Photovoltaic Cells , 2001 .

[28]  Henrik Lindström,et al.  Electron Transport in the Nanostructured TiO2-Electrolyte System Studied with Time-Resolved Photocurrents , 1997 .

[29]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  Morphology and Adsorbate Dependence of Ionic Transport in Dye Sensitized Mesoporous TiO2 Films , 1998 .

[30]  F. Willig,et al.  Influence of trap filling on photocurrent transients in polycrystalline TiO2 , 1991 .

[31]  S. Hotchandani,et al.  Electrochemically assisted photocatalysis: titania particulate film electrodes for photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol , 1993 .

[32]  David Emin,et al.  High mobility n‐type charge carriers in large single crystals of anatase (TiO2) , 1994 .

[33]  Juan Bisquert,et al.  Physical Chemical Principles of Photovoltaic Conversion with Nanoparticulate, Mesoporous Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells , 2004 .

[34]  M. Grätzel,et al.  A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films , 1991, Nature.

[35]  Eric A. Schiff,et al.  Ambipolar Diffusion of Photocarriers in Electrolyte-Filled, Nanoporous TiO2† , 2000 .

[36]  Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin,et al.  Conversion of light to electricity by cis-X2bis(2,2'-bipyridyl-4,4'-dicarboxylate)ruthenium(II) charge-transfer sensitizers (X = Cl-, Br-, I-, CN-, and SCN-) on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide electrodes , 1993 .

[37]  Marc A. Anderson,et al.  Vectorial electron injection into transparent semiconductor membranes and electric field effects on the dynamics of light-induced charge separation , 1990 .

[38]  Hironori Arakawa,et al.  Highly efficient photon-to-electron conversion with mercurochrome-sensitized nanoporous oxide semiconductor solar cells , 2000 .

[39]  Michael Grätzel,et al.  An alternative efficient redox couple for the dye-sensitized solar cell system. , 2003, Chemistry.

[40]  D. Vanmaekelbergh,et al.  DRIVING FORCE FOR ELECTRON TRANSPORT IN POROUS NANOSTRUCTURED PHOTOELECTRODES , 1999 .

[41]  D. Vanmaekelbergh,et al.  Trap-Limited Electronic Transport in Assemblies of Nanometer-Size TiO2 Particles. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[42]  A. J. Frank,et al.  Band Edge Movement and Recombination Kinetics in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solar Cells: A Study by Intensity Modulated Photovoltage Spectroscopy , 1997 .