Examining the Effects of Interactive Dynamic Multimedia and Direct Touch Input on Performance of a Procedural Motor Task

[1]  Benjamin H. Layne,et al.  Color, graphics, and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson , 1988 .

[2]  Nicola J. Gibbons,et al.  The interactivity effect in multimedia learning , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[3]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[4]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[6]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[9]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[10]  Meekyoung Kim,et al.  Do students benefit equally from interactive computer simulations regardless of prior knowledge levels? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[11]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Out Steps. , 2003 .

[12]  Khaled Sabry,et al.  Evaluation of the interactivity of web-based learning systems: principles and process , 2003 .

[13]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[14]  Slava Kalyuga.  Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction , 2007 .

[15]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[16]  T. Gog,et al.  Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. , 2006 .

[17]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[18]  F. Garbarini,et al.  At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  John Strobel.  All the better to see you with: A comparison of approaches to delivering instructions for Lego construction tasks , 2010 .

[20]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[21]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Learning With Real Machines or Diagrams: Application of Knowledge to Real-World Problems , 1995 .

[22]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Kinesthetic cues aid spatial memory , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  D. Lewalter.  Cognitive Strategies for Learning from Static and Dynamic Visuals , 2003 .

[24]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gesturing makes learning last , 2008, Cognition.

[25]  T. Jong.  Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[26]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Luca Tummolini,et al.  The embodied mind extended: using words as social tools , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[30]  Harald Reiterer,et al.  Does (multi-)touch aid users' spatial memory and navigation in 'panning' and in 'zooming & panning' UIs? , 2012, AVI.

[31]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[32]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[33]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[34]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments Special Issue on Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends , 2007 .

[36]  Paul Ginns.  Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[37]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[38]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Emerging Themes in Cognitive Load Theory: The Transient Information and the Collective Working Memory Effects , 2011 .

[39]  S. Kita,et al.  The nature of gestures ' beneficial role in spatial problem solving , 2013 .

[40]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation in computer-based instruction , 1990 .

[41]  Antonio Pflüger,et al.  Executive Summary. , 2012, Journal of the ICRU.

[42]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[43]  Autumn B. Hostetter,et al.  Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[46]  F. Paas,et al.  Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective , 2007 .

[47]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[48]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[49]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[50]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[51]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. , 2011 .

[53]  Ricky Curran,et al.  Do dynamic work instructions provide an advantage over static instructions in a small scale assembly task , 2010 .

[54]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[55]  Thomas R. Tretter,et al.  Haptic Augmentation of Science Instruction: Does Touch Matter? , 2006 .

[56]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Reasoning With External Visualizations: What Matters Is What You See, Not Whether You Interact , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  Willie Miller,et al.  iLearning: The Future of Higher Education? Student Perceptions on Learning with Mobile Tablets , 2012 .

[58]  Paul Ayres.  Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems , 2006 .

[59]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[60]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[61]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  Examining the Effects of Different Multiple Representational Systems in Learning Primary Mathematics , 2002 .

[62]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[63]  M. Hegarty.  Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[64]  R. Mayer,et al.  Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. , 2002 .

[65]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Effects of Secondary Loading Task Modality on Attentional Reserve Capacity , 2008 .

[66]  Jennifer S. Tucker.  Mobile Learning Approaches for U.S. Army Training , 2010 .

[67]  R Wesp,et al.  Gestures maintain spatial imagery. , 2001, The American journal of psychology.

[68]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[69]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[70]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[71]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[72]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[73]  R. Mayer.  Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[74]  R. Servidio,et al.  Gesture as a Cognitive Support to Solve Mathematical Problems , 2011 .

[75]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Gesture Changes Thought by Grounding It in Action , 2010, Psychological science.

[76]  Wayne L Waag,et al.  Visual-spatial abilities of pilots , 1993 .

[77]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[78]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Learner Experience and Efficiency of Instructional Guidance , 2001 .

[79]  Andrea H. Cameron,et al.  Digital course materials: A case study of the Apple iPad in the academic environment , 2011 .

[80]  Alain Breuleux,et al.  Effect of Animation in Enhancing Descriptive and Procedural Texts in a Multimedia Learning Environment , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[81]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  Embodied cognition as a motivating perspective for haptic interaction design: A position paper , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[82]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[83]  David F. Feldon.  Cognitive load theory and instructional design , 2009 .

[84]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[85]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[86]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[87]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  What animated illustrations conditions can improve technical document comprehension in young students? Format, signaling and control of the presentation , 2005 .

[88]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[89]  John Sweller,et al.  The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[90]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism , 2012, Emergency Radiology.

[91]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  Revising the Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning. , 2008 .

[92]  R. Ryan,et al.  Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. , 1983 .

[93]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  Dynamic visualisations and learning , 2004 .

[94]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[95]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[96]  Ruth N. Schwartz,et al.  Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module , 2012, Medical teacher.

[97]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[98]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[99]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[100]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[101]  Paul Ayres,et al.  Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[102]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models , 1999 .

[103]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[104]  R. Wisher,et al.  Staying Sharp: Retention of Military Knowledge and Skills , 1999 .

[105]  F. Paas,et al.  An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks , 2012 .

[106]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[107]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons with a Mouse , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[108]  P. Ström,et al.  High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[109]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[110]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Facilitating Understanding of Movements in Dynamic Visualizations: an Embodied Perspective , 2011 .

[111]  Laurie D. Edwards,et al.  Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk , 2009 .

[112]  Min Liu,et al.  The impact of animation interactivity on novices' learning of introductory statistics , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[113]  M. Goodale,et al.  Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[114]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[115]  R. Vallerand,et al.  On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) , 2000 .

[116]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us? , 2013, Cognitive Processing.

[117]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[118]  Tony DeRose,et al.  Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation , 2009, Graphics Interface.