Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of U.S. clean air act on coal-fired power plants

This study proposes a use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to measure Returns to Scale (RTS) of US coal-fired power plants. The power plants produce not only desirable outputs (e.g., electricity) but also undesirable outputs (e.g., CO2 and NOx) as a result of their plant operations. Therefore, the proposed use of DEA also measures a new concept, or “DTS: Damages to Scale” (corresponding to RTS for undesirable outputs). Both scale measures discussed in this study are a quick-and-easy approach for assessing RTS and DTS, but not an exact method, because it does not consider a direct linkage between the two measures. This study applies the proposed approach to examine the legal validity of U.S. Clean Air Act (CAA). We find that the CAA has been legally effective and influential on the operation of coal-fired power plants in the United States because their plant operations belong to increasing RTS on a desirable output and increasing DTS on three undesirable outputs. The increasing DTS indicates a need for managerial improvement and/or engineering innovation such as advanced clean coal technology. This empirical result implies that U.S. federal and state governments need to expand the legal scope of CAA to the emission control of CO2 because the current CAA excludes the regulation on CO2 emission that is now considered as a main source of the global warming and climate change.

[1]  Alfons Oude Lansink,et al.  The effect of heating technologies on CO(2) and energy efficiency of Dutch greenhouse firms. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[3]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: Strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms , 2012 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measurement of Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs? , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[6]  William W. Cooper,et al.  A goal interval programming model for resource allocation in a marine environmental protection program , 1976 .

[7]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance , 2008 .

[8]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[10]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework , 2004 .

[12]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[13]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions , 2012 .

[14]  Konstantinos P. Triantis,et al.  Dominance-based measurement of productive and environmental performance for manufacturing , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: Desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants , 2012 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Cost Horizons and Certainty Equivalents: An Approach to Stochastic Programming of Heating Oil , 1958 .

[17]  Katsuya Tanaka,et al.  Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry : A directional distance function approach , 2007 .

[18]  Yuji Ijiri,et al.  Accounting Essays by Professor William W. Cooper: Revisiting in Commemoration of His Ninety-Fifth Birthday , 2010 .

[19]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Dea Duality on Returns to Scale (Rts) in Production and Cost Analyses: An Occurrence of Multiple Solutions and Differences Between Production-Based and Cost-Based Rts Estimates , 1999 .

[20]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  BLENDING AVIATION GASOLINES-A STUDY IN PROGRAMMING INTERDEPENDENT ACTIVITIES IN AN INTEGRATED OIL COMPANY' , 1952 .

[23]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[24]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: a cross-country comparison , 2002 .

[25]  W. Cooper,et al.  Survey of mathematical programming models in air pollution management , 1997 .

[26]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: A range-adjusted measure approach , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  MES-DEA modelling for analysing anti-industrial pollution efficiency and its application in Anhui province of China , 2004 .

[28]  Carl A. Pasurka,et al.  Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework , 2006 .

[29]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: A non-parametric approach , 2000 .

[30]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: U.S. coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization) , 2012 .

[31]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  A chance-constrained goal programming model to evaluate response resources for marine pollution disasters. Research report , 1979 .

[32]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Core business concentration vs. corporate diversification in the US electric utility industry: Synergy and deregulation effects , 2009 .

[34]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[35]  Elvira Silva,et al.  CO2 and Energy Efficiency of Different Heating Technologies in the Dutch Glasshouse Industry , 2003 .

[36]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[37]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: Theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  M. Braglia,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries , 2002 .