The skin conductance orienting response to semantic stimuli: significance can be independent of arousal.

The characteristics of stimuli that elicit skin conductance responses (SCRs) have been conceptualized in varied ways, with strong emphasis on the significance or arousing quality of stimuli. Our goal was to determine whether "significance" can be shown to have an effect on SCRs independent of "arousal," using words as stimuli. Ratings of words indicated that significance is partially independent of arousal. In Study 1, SCRs from 43 participants during presentation of 20 significant, nonarousing words with a negative valence that were either depression related or potentially self-referent and 20 nonsignificant words matched on valence and arousal showed a main effect of significance. In Study 2 (N=44), significant, nonarousing words were sampled more broadly to examine the effects of self-reference and valence. Significance, rather than just negativity or self-reference, elicited SCRs independently of arousal. SCRs to significant words may reflect cognitive and attentional processes that, in turn, might prove useful for the assessment of the cognitive aspects of anxiety.

[1]  S. Epstein,et al.  Theory and experiment on the measurement of approach-avoidance conflict. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[2]  G. Wilson.  GSR Responses to Fear-Related Stimuli , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  A. S. Bernstein,et al.  The orienting response as novelty and significance detector: reply to O'Gorman. , 1979, Psychophysiology.

[4]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Orienting reflexes and significance: a reply to O'Gorman. , 1979, Psychophysiology.

[5]  A. S. Bernstein.  The orienting response and stimulus significance: Further comments , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[6]  P. Venables,et al.  Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. , 1981 .

[7]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Novelty and significance as determiners of the GSR index of the orienting reflex , 1982 .

[8]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Stimulus significance and bilateral SCRs to potentially phobic pictures. , 1984, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  A. Damasio,et al.  Electrodermal discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a methodology. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[10]  S. Mineka,et al.  Immunization against the observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to Threat , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states , 1992 .

[13]  Francisco Esteves,et al.  Gateways to consciousness : Emotion, attention, and electrodermal activity , 1993 .

[14]  M. Bradley,et al.  Probing picture perception: activation and emotion. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[15]  P. Venables,et al.  The effects of age, sex and time of testing on skin conductance activity , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[16]  M. Bradley,et al.  Picture media and emotion: effects of a sustained affective context. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[17]  S. Mineka,et al.  Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  R. Baños,et al.  Selective Processing of Food– and Body–Related Information and Autonomic Arousal in Patients with Eating Disorders , 1998, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[19]  Startle Modification: Affective Individual Differences, Psychopathology, and Startle Reflex Modification , 1999 .

[20]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[21]  D. Barlow.  Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. , 2000 .

[22]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[23]  S. Mineka,et al.  A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder. , 2001, Psychological review.

[24]  C. Grillon,et al.  Contextual fear-potentiated startle conditioning in humans: replication and extension. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[25]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Benzodiazepines have no effect on fear-potentiated startle in humans , 2002, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety , 2002 .

[27]  L. Hawk,et al.  Addressing the specificity of affective startle modulation: fear versus disgust , 2002, Biological Psychology.

[28]  Christian Grillon,et al.  Startle reactivity and anxiety disorders: aversive conditioning, context, and neurobiology , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  Christopher J Patrick,et al.  The psychophysiology of anxiety disorder: fear memory imagery. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[30]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Effects of the beta-blocker propranolol on cued and contextual fear conditioning in humans , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[31]  R. Bakeman.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[32]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.