Individual and team annotation effects on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills

Many students enter college without the needed skills to be successful. Colleges and universities are seeking instructional interventions to address these needs. Various classes are leveraging web-based social media to provide new instructional technologies that will help students learn. This paper reports on two studies related to the potential of online social annotation for improving teaching and learning in second-semester Freshman English classes. The approach, referred to as the Social Annotation Model-Learning System (SAM-LS), combines various instructional strategies, team-based learning, and a social annotation computer-supported collaborative learning tool, HyLighter, to increase student engagement with selected essays and with classmates. SAM-LS stimulates students to actively monitor their thoughts and compare them to both peers and the instructor (or domain experts). Study 1 showed no significant difference between the SAM-LS approach and a control; however, results appear to be related to confounding factors. Study 2 showed that students achieve better outcomes on measures of reading comprehension and meta-cognitive skill, but not critical thinking, when SAM-LS activities include small team collaborations. The two studies suggest future directions for research and development of SAM-LS and the HyLighter tool.

[1]  Sarah E. Peterson,et al.  The cognitive functions of underlining as a study technique , 1991 .

[2]  A. Gokhale.  Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[3]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence Applied: Understanding and Increasing Your Intellectual Skills , 1986 .

[4]  W. Sandoval.  Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs , 2004 .

[5]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[6]  John Lavagnino.  Excerpted: Reading, Scholarship, and Hypertext Editions , 1997 .

[7]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  Attaining Excellence Through Deliberate Practice: Insights from the Study of Expert Performance , 2008 .

[8]  William J. Hussar,et al.  The Condition of Education , 2010 .

[9]  Chris Scruton,et al.  Constructing texts/understanding texts: Lessons from antiquity and the middle ages , 1997 .

[10]  Betsy Oudenhoven,et al.  Remediation at the Community College: Pressing Issues, Uncertain Solutions , 2002 .

[11]  Carol Porter-O'Donnell.  Beyond the Yellow Highlighter: Teaching Annotation Skills to Improve Reading Comprehension. , 2004 .

[12]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? , 2002 .

[13]  Stephen Provasnik,et al.  The Condition of Education 2001. NCES 2001-072. , 2001 .

[14]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  NAEP 1998 Writing Report Card for the Nation and the States. , 1999 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Communities of Learning and Thinking, or A Context by Any Other Name , 1990 .

[16]  A. Fisher,et al.  Critical Thinking: An Introduction , 2001 .

[17]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[18]  Hunter R. Boylan.  Demographics, Outcomes, and Activities. , 1999 .

[19]  Hunter R. Boylan.  Harvard Symposium 2000: Developmental Education: Demographics, Outcomes, and Activities , 1999 .

[20]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Designing electronic collaborative learning environments , 2004 .

[21]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[22]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[23]  Mortimer J. Adler,et al.  How to Read a Book , 1940 .

[24]  S. Tobias,et al.  The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis , 1998 .

[25]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[26]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[27]  Steven R. Cox,et al.  Do Reading Skills Courses Help Underprepared Readers Achieve Academic Success in College? , 2003 .

[28]  Carolyn A. Strand,et al.  Using the Team‐Learning Model in a Managerial Accounting Class: An Experiment in Cooperative Learning , 2001 .

[29]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The effects of informational complexity and working memory on problem-solving efficiency , 2008 .

[30]  John J. Clement,et al.  Cognitive Process Instruction: Research on Teaching Thinking Skills , 1979 .

[31]  César A. Collazos,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES TO SUPPORT THE MONITORING OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROCESSES , 2004 .

[32]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[33]  Zhijie Xu,et al.  Online annotation - Research and practices , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[34]  April Haberyan,et al.  Team-Based Learning in an Industrial/Organizational Psychology Course , 2007 .

[35]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[36]  M. Bober,et al.  Team-Based Activities to Promote Engaged Learning , 2007 .

[37]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  John Bradley,et al.  Supporting Annotation as a Scholarly Tool - Experiences From the Online Chopin Variorum Edition , 2006, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[39]  Michele L. Simpson,et al.  Textbook Annotation: An Effective and Efficient Study Strategy for College Students. , 1990 .

[40]  Lisa Mendelman,et al.  Critical Thinking and Reading , 2007 .

[41]  Robert H. McCabe,et al.  No One to Waste: A Report to Public Decision-Makers and Community College Leaders , 2000 .

[42]  Hope J. Hartman.  Metacognition in learning and instruction : theory, research and practice , 2001 .

[43]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization , 1975 .

[44]  David Lebow,et al.  HyLighter and Interactive Annotation: New Technology to Develop Higher-Order Thinking Skills , 2003 .

[45]  G. L. M. Schellings,et al.  Main points in an instructional text, as idetified by students and by their teachers , 1995 .

[46]  Christell O Bray,et al.  Team-based learning in an undergraduate nursing course. , 2008, The Journal of nursing education.

[47]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[48]  T. Koschmann,et al.  CSCL 2 : carrying forward the conversation , 2003 .

[49]  Britta M. Thompson,et al.  Team‐based learning at ten medical schools: two years later , 2007, Medical education.

[50]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  Annotation Technologies: A Software and Research Review. , 2002 .

[51]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[52]  David M. Moss.  Bringing Together Technology and Students: Examining the Use of Technology in a Project-Based Class , 2000 .