Communication about Children's Clinical Trials as Observed and Experienced: Qualitative Study of Parents and Practitioners

Background Recruiting children to clinical trials is perceived to be challenging. To identify ways to optimise recruitment and its conduct, we compared how parents and practitioners described their experiences of recruitment to clinical trials. Methods and Findings This qualitative study ran alongside four children's clinical trials in 11 UK research sites. It compared analyses of semi-structured interviews with analyses of audio-recordings of practitioner-family dialogue during trial recruitment discussions. Parents from 59 families were interviewed; 41 had participated in audio-recorded recruitment discussions. 31 practitioners were interviewed. Parents said little in the recruitment discussions contributing a median 16% of the total dialogue and asking a median of one question. Despite this, parents reported a positive experience of the trial approach describing a sense of comfort and safety. Even if they declined or if the discussion took place at a difficult time, parents understood the need to approach them and spoke of the value of research. Some parents viewed participation as an ‘exciting’ opportunity. By contrast, practitioners often worried that approaching families about research burdened families. Some practitioners implied that recruiting to clinical trials was something which they found aversive. Many were also concerned about the amount of information they had to provide and believed this overwhelmed families. Whilst some practitioners thought the trial information leaflets were of little use to families, parents reported that they used and valued the leaflets. However, both parties agreed that the leaflets were too long and wanted them to be more reader-friendly. Conclusions Parents were more positive about being approached to enter their child into a clinical trial than practitioners anticipated. The concerns of some practitioners, that parents would be overburdened, were unfounded. Educating practitioners about how families perceive clinical trials and providing them with ‘moral’ support in approaching families may benefit paediatric research and, ultimately, patients.

[1]  P. Williamson,et al.  Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[2]  C. Dibben,et al.  The English indices of deprivation 2004 , 2011 .

[3]  B. Young,et al.  The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[4]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Getting to "no": strategies primary care physicians use to deny patient requests. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  L. Hartling,et al.  StaR Child Health: an initiative for RCTs in children , 2009, The Lancet.

[6]  L. Grant,et al.  Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Chamberlain,et al.  Perceived challenges to obtaining informed consent for a time-sensitive emergency department study of pediatric status epilepticus: results of two focus groups. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[8]  D. Drotar,et al.  A Physician-Directed Intervention: Teaching and Measuring Better Informed Consent , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  F. Hamdy,et al.  It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials. , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[10]  Yvonne Freer,et al.  More Information, Less Understanding: A Randomized Study on Consent Issues in Neonatal Research , 2009, Pediatrics.

[11]  L. Hartling,et al.  Children Are Not Just Small Adults: The Urgent Need for High-Quality Trial Evidence in Children , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Bodil Wilde-Larsson,et al.  Patient Participation in Health Care Consultations: Qualitative Perspectives , 2008 .

[13]  L. Siminoff Why learning to communicate with our patients is so important: using communication to enhance accrual to cancer clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G. Andrews,et al.  Mja Guidelines for Assessing Qualitative Research Quality in Qualitative Research Criteria for Authors and Assessors in the Submission and Assessment of Qualitative Research Articles for the Medical Journal of Australia , 2022 .

[15]  M. Tobin,et al.  Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[16]  D Elbourne,et al.  Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[17]  R. Smyth,et al.  Making a difference: the clinical research programme for children , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[18]  P. Butow,et al.  Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[19]  P. Ravaud,et al.  Noninvitation of eligible individuals to participate in pediatric studies: a qualitative study. , 2007, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[20]  M. Jefford,et al.  Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  A. Thompson,et al.  The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[22]  J. Austin Ethical issues related to the increased emphasis on children participating in research , 2006, Chronic illness.

[23]  R. Smyth,et al.  A major new initiative to improve treatment for children , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[24]  Sabrina T. Wong,et al.  Shared Decision Making and the Experience of Partnership in Primary Care , 2006, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[25]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Discussing randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy: evaluation of a Cancer Research UK training programme , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  M. Stewart,et al.  Effect on Health-Related Outcomes of Interventions to Alter the Interaction Between Patients and Practitioners: A Systematic Review of Trials , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[27]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Comparison of the informed consent process for randomized clinical trials in pediatric and adult oncology. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  K. Anand,et al.  Neonatal Research and the Validity of Informed Consent Obtained in the Perinatal Period , 2004, Journal of Perinatology.

[30]  P. Butow,et al.  Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials: describing current practice. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[31]  M. Boccia,et al.  The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[32]  D. Drotar,et al.  Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. , 2004, JAMA.

[33]  Lesley Fallowfield,et al.  Factors affecting patient and clinician satisfaction with the clinical consultation: Can communication skills training for clinicians improve satisfaction? , 2003, Psycho-oncology.

[34]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision‐making in the consultation , 2003, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[35]  N. Singhal,et al.  Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[36]  M. Coovert,et al.  Communication and consumer decision making about cancer clinical trials. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[37]  J. Gurwitz Testing medications in children. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  P. Butow,et al.  Pediatricians' attitudes toward randomized controlled trials involving children. , 2002, The Journal of pediatrics.

[39]  P. Bower,et al.  Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[40]  Nicola Mead,et al.  The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[41]  R. Power,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  S. Mason,et al.  Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study , 2000, The Lancet.

[44]  T. Coleman Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. , 2000, Family practice.

[45]  C P Bradley,et al.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  K Chamberlain,et al.  Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research , 2000, Journal of health psychology.

[47]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[48]  John Mullooly,et al.  Effect of Clinician Communication Skills Training on Patient Satisfaction , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  J. Straker,et al.  What We Didn’t Learn Because of Who Would Not Talk to Us , 1999 .

[50]  M. Coovert,et al.  Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  R. Smyth,et al.  Research in children: ethical and scientific aspects , 1999, The Lancet.

[52]  M K Marvel,et al.  Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved? , 1999, JAMA.

[53]  B. Lange,et al.  Informed consent in the childrens cancer group , 1998, Cancer.

[54]  D. Silverman,et al.  Ensuring rigour in qualitative research , 1997 .

[55]  Kristine L. Fitch,et al.  The Normative Context of Advice as Social Support , 1997 .

[56]  J. Walterspiel Informed consent: influence on patient selection among critically ill premature infants. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[57]  Denis Pereira Gray,et al.  Doctors talking to patients. , 1984 .

[58]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[59]  D. Notterman,et al.  Clinical Report—Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Studies to Evaluate Drugs in Pediatric Populations , 2010 .

[60]  D. Macrae Conducting clinical trials in pediatrics. , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[61]  N. Britten,et al.  Understanding the process of patient participation , 2007 .

[62]  K. Kipnis Seven Vulnerabilities in the Pediatric Research Subject , 2003, Theoretical medicine and bioethics.

[63]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[64]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[65]  Sarah Hewlett,et al.  Consent to research , 1994 .

[66]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Research Act , 1978 .