Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes. III. Effect of poly(L-lactide) membrane pore size on the bone healing process in large defects.

Poly(L-lactide) membranes of various pore sizes: microporous, medium pore size (10-20 microns), and large pore size (20-200 microns) were implanted in 15 mature New Zealand female rabbits to cover a 10-mm diaphyseal defect created in the radius. Five rabbits were implanted with each membrane. No internal fixation was used, as it was assumed that the intact ulna splints the radius adequately. Postoperative radiographs revealed the formation of hematoma within the bone defect. At the 2nd week after surgery, the hematoma was resorbed and the formation of new bone was noted radiologically either at the ends of the bone fragments or as osteophytes on the proximal and distal edges of the membrane. At 4 weeks, the newly formed bone was growing centripetally from the fragment ends. The bone regeneration took place in the majority of the cases under investigation, regardless of the pore size of the polymeric membranes used. There were, however, some differences in the intensity of the bone regeneration process. Although at 2 weeks after surgery bone formation was seen radiographically in all animals, at 6 months five rabbits of five, four rabbits of five, and three rabbits of five implanted respectively with microporous membrane, medium pore-size membrane, and large pore-size membrane showed complete regeneration of bone within the defects. It is suggested that the primary function of the membrane used to cover bone defects is to preserve the osteogenic components present in the space under the membrane from escaping and support the growth of cells within the "medullary cavity" formed by the tubular implant.

[1]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Guided tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes of polylactic acid or polyurethane. , 1992, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  S. Nyman,et al.  Guided bone regeneration of cranial defects, using biodegradable barriers: an experimental pilot study in the rabbit. , 1992, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[3]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Biodegradable guide for bone regeneration. Polyurethane membranes tested in rabbit radius defects. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  S. Nyman Bone regeneration using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  N. Lang,et al.  Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. , 1990, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  S. Mackinnon New directions in peripheral nerve surgery. , 1989, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  S. Nyman,et al.  Healing of Bone Defects by Guided Tissue Regeneration , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Polyurethane vascular prostheses in pigs , 1987 .

[9]  G. Boering,et al.  Resorbable materials of poly(L-lactide). VII. In vivo and in vitro degradation. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[10]  V. Hentz,et al.  Fascicular Tubulization: A Cellular Approach to Peripheral Nerve Repair , 1983, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  S. Gogolewski,et al.  Resorbable materials of poly(L-lactide) , 1983 .

[12]  T. Karring,et al.  The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey. , 1982, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  M. Spector,et al.  Characteristics of tissue growth into Proplast and porous polyethylene implants in bone. , 1979, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  M. Spector,et al.  A high-modulus polymer for porous orthopedic implants: biomechanical compatibility of porous implants. , 1978, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  C. Bassett,et al.  Activation of the resting periosteum. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  I. R. Toranto,et al.  Bone growth into porous carbon, polyethylene, and polypropylene prostheses. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  E. White,et al.  Tissue ingrowth of Replamineform implants. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  E. White,et al.  Replamineform porous biomaterials for hard tissue implant applications. , 1975, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  J. Klawitter,et al.  Application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load bearing internal orthopedic applications , 1971 .

[20]  C. Bassett,et al.  Repair and remodeling in Millipore-isolated defects in cortical bone. , 1967, Acta anatomica.

[21]  P. Goldhaber Osteogenic Induction across Millipore Filters in vivo , 1961, Science.

[22]  W. J. Linghorne THE SEQUENCE OF EVENTS IN OSTEOGENESIS AS STUDIED IN POLYETHYLENE TUBES , 1960, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Bassett,et al.  Peripheral nerve and spinal cord regenertion: factors leading to success of a tubulation technique employing millipore. , 1959, Experimental neurology.

[24]  S Nyman,et al.  Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique. An experimental study in monkeys. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[25]  C. Batich,et al.  New attachment formation following controlled tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes. , 1988, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  G D Winter,et al.  Transcutaneous implants: reactions of the skin-implant interface. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  A. Weinstein,et al.  The role of porous polymeric materials in prosthesis attachment. , 1974, Journal of biomedical materials research.