The Closer the Relationship, the More the Interaction on Facebook? Investigating the Case of Taiwan Users

This study argues for the necessity of applying offline contexts to social networking site research and the importance of distinguishing the relationship types of users' counterparts when studying Facebook users' behaviors. In an attempt to examine the relationship among users' behaviors, their counterparts' relationship types, and the users' perceived acquaintanceships after using Facebook, this study first investigated users' frequently used tools when interacting with different types of friends. Users tended to use less time- and effort-consuming and less privacy-concerned tools with newly acquired friends. This study further examined users' behaviors in terms of their closeness and intimacy and their perceived acquaintanceships toward four different types of friends. The study found that users gained more perceived acquaintanceships from less close friends with whom users have more frequent interaction but less intimate behaviors. As for closer friends, users tended to use more intimate activities to interact with them. However, these activities did not necessarily occur more frequently than the activities they employed with their less close friends. It was found that perceived acquaintanceships with closer friends were significantly lower than those with less close friends. This implies that Facebook is a mechanism for new friends, rather than close friends, to become more acquainted.

[1]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[2]  Greg Heiberger,et al.  Have You Facebooked Astin Lately? Using Technology to Increase Student Involvement , 2008 .

[3]  Andrew M. Ledbetter,et al.  Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships , 2007, New Media Soc..

[4]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  Staging on the Internet: Research on Online Photo Album Users in Taiwan with the Spectacle/Performance Paradigm , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Michael Monsour Meanings of Intimacy in Cross- and Same-Sex Friendships , 1992 .

[6]  James A. Danowski,et al.  The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[8]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  The Quality of Online and Offline Relationships: The Role of Multiplexity and Duration of Social Relationships , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Young Adults' Use of Social Networking Sites , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  許瓊文 Staging on the Internet: Research on online photo album users in Taiwan with the Spectacle/Performance Paradigm (SPP) , 2007 .

[11]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[14]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .