Is ‘Bio-Based’ Activity a Panacea for Sustainable Competitive Growth?

Taking a European Union focus, this paper explicitly models competing uses of biomass to quantify its contribution toward a sustainable low carbon model of economic growth. To this end, a state-of-the-art multisector multiregion modelling tool is combined with a specially developed bio-based variant of a well-known global database. Employing a decomposition method of the market drivers and classifying alternative future pathways, the aim is to understand how public policies can influence the apparent trade-off between the goals of lower carbon economic growth, environmental preservation and sustainable biomass usage. Results reveal that in targeting specific societal goals public policy can be effective, although this can lead to broader economic issues of resource inefficiency and even direct policy conflicts.

[1]  G. Philippidis,et al.  The EU Budget Battle: Assessing the Trade and Welfare Impacts of CAP Budgetary Reform , 2015 .

[2]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage , 2011 .

[3]  A. Tabeau,et al.  Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets , 2008 .

[4]  María Sicilia Salvadores.  Projected Costs of Generating Electricity , 1998 .

[5]  U. Fritsche,et al.  Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way Forward , 2014 .

[6]  J.C.M. van Meijl,et al.  Macroeconomic outlook of sustainable energy and biorenewables innovations (MEV II) , 2016 .

[7]  N. Scarlat,et al.  The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts , 2015 .

[8]  J. Huisman.  The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[9]  K. McCormick,et al.  Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies , 2015 .

[10]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems , 2015 .

[11]  K. Pearson,et al.  Decomposing Simulation Results with Respect to Exogenous Shocks , 2000 .

[12]  F. V. Tongeren,et al.  Fertiliser and Biofuel Policies in the Global Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Agricultural Markets and Farm Incomes , 2014 .

[13]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry , 2016 .

[14]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 : Model description and policy applications , 2014 .

[15]  Mark Horridge,et al.  TASTEa program to adapt detailed tradeand tariff data to GTAP-related purposes , 2008 .

[16]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The Impact of Environmental and Climate Constraints on Global Food Supply , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[17]  Emanuele Ferrari,et al.  Observing and analysing the Bioeconomy in the EU – Adapting data and tools to new questions and challenges , 2014 .

[18]  PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe , 2012 .

[19]  P. Kyle,et al.  Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison , 2014 .

[20]  Marko Wagner,et al.  Global Trade Analysis Modeling And Applications , 2016 .