Connectionist Modeling of Relearning and Generalization in Acquired Dyslexic Patients

Connectionist models implement cognitive processes in terms of cooperative and competitive interactions among large numbers of simple, neuron-like processing units. Such models provide a useful computational framework in which to explore the nature of normal and impaired cognitive processes. The current work extends the relevance of connectionist modeling in neuropsychology to address issues in cognitive rehabilitation: the degree and speed of recovery through retraining, the extent to which improvement on treated items generalizes to untreated items, and how treated items are selected to maximize this generalization. A network previously shown to model impairments in mapping orthography to semantics was retrained after damage. The degree of relearning and generalization depended on the location of the lesion and had interesting implications for understanding the nature and variability of recovery in patients. In a second simulation, retraining on words whose semantics are atypical of their category yielded more generalization than retraining on more typical words, suggesting a counterintuitive strategy for selecting items in patient therapy to maximize recovery. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that the nature of relearning in damaged connectionist networks can make important contributions to a theory of rehabilitation in patients.

[1]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[3]  B. Julesz,et al.  Maturational Windows And Adult Cortical Plasticity , 1995 .

[4]  Curt von Euler,et al.  Temporal Information Processing in the Nervous System: Special Reference to Dyslexia and Dysphasia. Conference proceedings. New York City, New York, September 12-15, 1992. , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[6]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia , 1991 .

[7]  M. Mozer,et al.  On the Interaction of Selective Attention and Lexical Knowledge: A Connectionist Account of Neglect Dyslexia , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines , 1986 .

[9]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[11]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[12]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  The role of models of language processing in rehabilitation of language impairments , 1993 .

[13]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[14]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  The rites of righting writing: Homophone remediation in acquired dysgraphia , 1987 .

[15]  D. Plaut Relearning after Damage in Connectionist Networks: Toward a Theory of Rehabilitation , 1996, Brain and Language.

[16]  Philip T. Quinlan,et al.  Connectionsim and psychology - a psychological perspective on new connectionist research , 1991 .

[17]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[18]  J. Kaas The reorganization of sensory and motor maps after injury in adult mammals , 2000 .

[19]  Sally Byng,et al.  A treatment for surface dyslexia , 1989 .

[20]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[21]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[22]  Sally Byng,et al.  Computer assisted remediation of a homophone comprehension disorder in surface dyslexia , 1989 .

[23]  J. Mandler Language comprehension. , 1979, Science.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[25]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Brendan S. Weekes,et al.  Surface Dyslexia and Surface Dysgraphia: Treatment Studies and Their Theoretical Implications , 1996 .

[27]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[29]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[30]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Using fast weights to deblur old memories , 1987 .

[31]  A. Kertesz Recovery and treatment. , 1993 .

[32]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[33]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Category-specific treatment of a lexical-semantic deficit: A single case study of global aphasia , 1989 .