Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations

Uses human capital theory and organizational ecology to explore the success of newly formed firms. Human capital focuses on the firm's founder and his/her background whereas organizational ecology considers the characteristics of the organization and its environmental conditions. Data used in the analysis were collected from 1,849 firm founders in Germany whose firms were formed in 1985-1986. Variables used were survival time, general and specific human capital of the founder, newness of the firm, initial size, organizational strategies, location, branch of industry, and market conditions. Of the firms considered, almost one-fourth had failed in the first two years, and 37% had failed within five years. The firms with founders who had more work experience and schooling improved their chances of survival. Those businesses that were novel were more likely to survive than those firms that were considered followers. Overall, the results show that all human capital variables considered have strong selection effects. (SRD)

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Random Walks and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships , 1991 .

[3]  Peter Preisendörfer,et al.  Adressenaktualisierung und Feldverlauf einer Studie über Gründung und Erfolg von Kleinbetrieben , 1991 .

[4]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology , 1990 .

[5]  Tony Lancaster,et al.  The econometric analysis of transition data , 1990 .

[6]  Trond Petersen,et al.  The Structure of Employment Terminations among Clerical Employees in a Large Bureaucracya , 1989 .

[7]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[8]  A. Link,et al.  In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship , 1989 .

[9]  E. O. Wright,et al.  The Fall and Rise of the Petty Bourgeoisie: Changing Patterns of Self-Employment in the Postwar United States , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness , 1986 .

[11]  Trond Petersen,et al.  Estimating Fully Parametric Hazard Rate Models with Time-Dependent Covariates , 1986 .

[12]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[13]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[14]  Timothy Bates,et al.  Entrepreneur Human Capital Endowments and Minority Business Viability , 1985 .

[15]  Pyong Gap Min,et al.  From White-Collar Occupations to Small Business: Korean Immigrants' Occupational Adjustment , 1984 .

[16]  G. Carroll,et al.  The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates , 1983 .

[17]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[18]  I. Light.  Disadvantaged Minorities in Self-Employment , 1979 .

[19]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[20]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  Organizations: Structure and process , 1977 .

[22]  J. Boswell,et al.  Book Review: The use of Computers for Management in Industry , 1973 .

[23]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[24]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[25]  Darab B. Unwalla,et al.  The enterprising man , 1964 .

[26]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .