Assessment of the Efficacy of the Bio-Absorbable Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose for Prevention of Post-Operative Pericardial Adhesion in the Rabbit Model

Pericardial adhesions complicate re-operative cardiac surgery and several attempts have been made to reduce adhesion formation. The efficacy of bio-absorbable oxidized regenerated cellulose in preventing post-operative pericardial adhesions was evaluated in the present study. Forty New Zealand white rabbits were divided into four groups of 10. In all rabbits an area of pericardium (2 × 2 cm) was excised. The wound was left open in groups 1 and 2 but replaced with bio-absorbable oxidized regenerated cellulose in groups 3 and 4. Rabbits in groups 1 and 3 were killed 3 weeks after surgery and those in groups 2 and 4 were killed at 6 weeks. Groups 1 and 2 showed more severe pericardial adhesions, more fibrous reaction and increased visibility of coronary vessels than groups 3 and 4, although there was no difference in inflammation. Light microscopy showed a mesothelium-like cell layer in groups 3 and 4. It is concluded that bio-absorbable oxidized regenerated cellulose may be suitable in patients receiving staged cardiac surgery and in those with a high probability of re-operation.

[1]  I. Işkesen,et al.  The effect of piroxicam on the prevention of postoperative retrosternal and pericardial adhesions , 2007, Acta Cardiologica.

[2]  Glenn D Prestwich,et al.  Postoperative pericardial adhesion prevention using Carbylan-SX in a rabbit model. , 2007, The Journal of surgical research.

[3]  G. Saed,et al.  Effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed) on the expression of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in human peritoneal fibroblasts and mesothelial cells. , 2006, Fertility and Sterility.

[4]  M. Kaška,et al.  Post-operative intraperitoneal adhesion prevention--the recent knowledge. , 2006, Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti.

[5]  Y. Suematsu,et al.  Prevention of postoperative pericardial adhesions with a novel regenerative collagen sheet. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Closure of the pericardium using synthetic bioabsorbable polymers. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  W. Walsh,et al.  Evaluation of a bioabsorable polylactide film in a large animal model for the reduction of retrosternal adhesions. , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  A. Barnett,et al.  How To Do Safe Sternal Reentry and the Risk Factors of Redo Cardiac Surgery: A 21‐Year Review with Zero Major Cardiac Injury , 2001, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[9]  A. Solina,et al.  Prevention of Pericardial Adhesions with N-O Carboxymethylchitosan in the Rabbit Model , 2001, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[10]  M. Diamond,et al.  Metaanalysis of the safety and efficacy of an adhesion barrier (Interceed TC7) in laparotomy. , 1999, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  Richard A. Harris,et al.  Comparison of Antiadhesive Treatments using an Objective Rat Model , 1999, The American surgeon.

[12]  D. Wiseman,et al.  Effect of different barriers of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on cecal and sidewall adhesions in the presence and absence of bleeding. , 1999, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[13]  C. Y. Wang,et al.  Prevention of retrosternal adhesion formation in a rabbit model using bioresorbable films of polyethylene glycol and polylactic acid. , 1998, The Journal of surgical research.

[14]  H. Sung,et al.  Heparinization on pericardial substitutes can reduce adhesion and epicardial inflammation in the dog. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Development of a dural substitute from synthetic bioabsorbable polymers. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  A. Haney,et al.  Comparison of the peritoneal cells elicited by oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) in a murine model. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M. Diamond,et al.  An appraisal of barrier agents in the reduction of adhesion formation following surgery. , 1990, Journal of gynecologic surgery.

[18]  S. Gabbay,et al.  New outlook on pericardial substitution after open heart operations. , 1989, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  E. Goldberg,et al.  Prevention of postoperative pericardial adhesions with hydrophilic polymer solutions. , 1988, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Prevention of retrosternal adhesions after pericardiotomy. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  C. Duran,et al.  Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure. An experimental study. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  A. Dobell,et al.  Catastrophic hemorrhage during redo sternotomy. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  B. Gersh,et al.  The morbidity and mortality of reoperation for coronary artery disease and analysis of late results with use of actuarial estimate of event-free interval. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  A. Geha,et al.  Use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute to facilitate reoperation in cardiac surgery. , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  F. Spencer,et al.  Guidelines for safely opening a previous sternotomy incision. , 1979, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  E. Blackstone,et al.  The early risk of re-replacement of aortic valves. , 1977, The Annals of thoracic surgery.