Lagrangian fe methods for coupled problems in fluid mechanics

Lagrangian finite element methods emerged in fluid dynamics when the deficiencies of the Eulerian methods in treating free surface flows (or generally domains undergoing large shape deformations) were faced. Their advantage relies upon natural tracking of boundaries and interfaces, a feature particularly important for interaction problems. Another attractive feature is the absence of the convective term in the fluid momentum equations written in the Lagrangian framework resulting in a symmetric discrete system matrix, an important feature in case iterative solvers are utilized. Unfortunately, the lack of the control over the mesh distortions is a major drawback of Lagrangian methods. In order to overcome this, a Lagrangian method must be equipped with an efficient re-meshing tool. This work aims at developing formulations and algorithms where maximum advantage of using Lagrangian finite element fluid formulations can be taken. In particular we concentrate our attention at fluid-structure interaction and thermally coupled applications, most of which originate from practical real-life problems. Two fundamental options are investigated - coupling two Lagrangian formulations (e.g. Lagrangian fluid and Lagrangian structure) and coupling the Lagrangian and Eulerian fluid formulations. In the first part of this work the basic concepts of the Lagrangian fluids, the so-called Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) [1], [2] are presented. These include nodal variable storage, mesh re-construction using Delaunay triangulation/tetrahedralization and alpha shape-based method for identification of the computational domain boundaries. This shall serve as a general basis for all the further developments of this work. Next we show how an incompressible Lagrangian fluid can be used in a partitioned fluid-structure interaction context. We present an improved Dirichlet-Neumann strategy for coupling the incompressible Lagrangian fluid with a rigid body. This is finally applied to an industrial problem dealing with the sea-landing of a satellite capsule. In the following, an extension of the method is proposed to allow dealing with fluid-structure problems involving general flexible structures. The method developed takes advantage of the symmetry of the discrete system matrix and by introducing a slight fluid compressibility allows to treat the fluid-structure interaction problem efficiently in a monolithic way. Thus, maximum benefit from using a similar description for both the fluid (updated Lagrangian) and the solid (total Lagrangian) is taken. We show next that the developed monolithic approach is particularly useful for modeling the interaction with light-weight structures. The validation of the method is done by means of comparison with experimental results and with a number of different methods found in literature. The second part of this work aims at coupling Lagrangian and Eulerian fluid formulations. The application area is the modeling of polymers under fire conditions. This kind of problem consists of modeling the two subsystems (namely the polymer and the surrounding air) and their thermomechanical interaction. A compressible fluid formulation based on the Eulerian description is used for modeling the air, whereas a Lagrangian description is used for the polymer. For the surrounding air we develop a model based upon the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Such choice is dictated by the presence of high temperature gradients in the problem of interest, which precludes the utilization of the Boussinesq approximation. The formulation is restricted to the sub-sonic flow regime, meeting the requirement of the problem of interest. The mechanical interaction of the subsystems is modeled by means of a one-way coupling, where the polymer velocities are imposed on the interface elements of the Eulerian mesh in a weak way. Thermal interaction is treated by means of the energy equation solved on the Eulerian mesh, containing thermal properties of both the subsystems, namely air and polymer. The developments of the second part of this work do not pretend to be by any means exhaustive; for instance, radiation and chemical reaction phenomena are not considered. Rather we make the first step in the direction of modeling the complicated thermo-mechanical problem and provide a general framework that in the future can be enriched with a more detailed and sophisticated models. However this would affect only the individual modules, preserving the overall architecture of the solution procedure unchanged. Each chapter concludes with the example section that includes both the validation tests and/or applications to the real-life problems. The final chapter highlights the achievements of the thesis and defines the future lines of research that naturally evolve from the results of this work.

[1]  J. Argyris An excursion into large rotations , 1982 .

[2]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions: Hamiltonian formulation and conserving numerical integration , 2009 .

[3]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Fluid Dynamics , 2005 .

[4]  Lothar Gaul,et al.  Solution of the Equations of Motion , 2003 .

[5]  E. Oñate,et al.  The particle finite element method. An overview , 2004 .

[6]  R. J. Príncipe,et al.  Subgrid scale stabilized finite elements for low speed flows , 2008 .

[7]  R. Codina Comparison of some finite element methods for solving the diffusion-convection-reaction equation , 1998 .

[8]  J. B. Perot,et al.  An analysis of the fractional step method , 1993 .

[9]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[10]  J. Reddy,et al.  The Finite Element Method in Heat Transfer and Fluid Dynamics , 1994 .

[11]  T. Hughes,et al.  The Galerkin/least-squares method for advective-diffusive equations , 1988 .

[12]  R. Codina Stabilized finite element approximation of transient incompressible flows using orthogonal subscales , 2002 .

[13]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Polyhedrization of an arbitrary 3D point set , 2003 .

[14]  Gregory T. Linteris,et al.  Progress Report on Numerical Modeling of Experimental Polymer Melt Flow Behavior. , 2004 .

[15]  Ramon Codina,et al.  An iterative penalty method for the finite element solution of the stationary Navier-Stokes equations , 1993 .

[16]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  An Object-oriented Environment for Developing Finite Element Codes for Multi-disciplinary Applications , 2010 .

[17]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Unified Lagrangian formulation for elastic solids and incompressible fluids: Application to fluid–structure interaction problems via the PFEM , 2008 .

[18]  Seung‐Yeal Ha,et al.  On the formation of shocks to the compressible Euler equations , 2009 .

[19]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Modeling Polymer Melt Flow Using the Particle Finite Element Method. | NIST , 2007 .

[20]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Stabilized shock hydrodynamics: I. A Lagrangian method , 2007 .

[21]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[22]  Raymond Viskanta,et al.  Transient natural convection of low‐Prandtl‐number fluids in a differentially heated cavity , 1991 .

[23]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Incremental topological flipping works for regular triangulations , 1992, SCG '92.

[24]  M. Mcpherson,et al.  Introduction to fluid mechanics , 1997 .

[25]  Dieter Dinkler,et al.  Fluid-structure coupling within a monolithic model involving free surface flows , 2005 .

[26]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Particle finite element method in fluid-mechanics including thermal convection-diffusion , 2005 .

[27]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .

[28]  Mark A. Christon,et al.  Computational predictability of time‐dependent natural convection flows in enclosures (including a benchmark solution) , 2002 .

[29]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: I. Symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier—Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics , 1986 .

[30]  F. Brezzi,et al.  A discourse on the stability conditions for mixed finite element formulations , 1990 .

[31]  Santiago Badia,et al.  Analysis of a Stabilized Finite Element Approximation of the Transient Convection-Diffusion Equation Using an ALE Framework , 2006, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[32]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Melting and spread of polymers in fire with the particle finite element method , 2010 .

[33]  Guirong Liu Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method , 2002 .

[34]  D. Owen,et al.  Design of simple low order finite elements for large strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids , 1996 .

[35]  Haym Benaroya,et al.  Modeling Fluid Structure Interaction , 2000 .

[36]  A. Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Computational aspects of vector-like parametrization of three-dimensional finite rotations , 1995 .

[37]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A comparative study of different sets of variables for solving compressible and incompressible flows , 1998 .

[38]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  A Monolithic FE Formulation for the Analysis of Membranes in Fluids , 2009 .

[39]  T. Hughes Multiscale phenomena: Green's functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methods , 1995 .

[40]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[41]  Guillermo Hauke,et al.  a Unified Approach to Compressible and Incompressible Flows and a New Entropy-Consistent Formulation of the K - Model. , 1994 .

[42]  C. Hickox,et al.  A numerical study of the applicability of the Boussinesq approximation for a fluid‐saturated porous medium , 1985 .

[43]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Robin-Robin preconditioned Krylov methods for fluid-structure interaction problems , 2009 .

[44]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method , 2003 .

[45]  I. Gohberg,et al.  Basic Operator Theory , 1981 .

[46]  Philip M. Gresho,et al.  Application of the FIDAP code to the 8:1 thermal cavity problem , 2002 .

[47]  Guillaume Houzeaux,et al.  A Chimera method based on a Dirichlet/Neumann(Robin) coupling for the Navier–Stokes equations , 2003 .

[48]  R. Codina Pressure Stability in Fractional Step Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flows , 2001 .

[49]  Ramon Codina,et al.  A general algorithm for compressible and incompressible flows. Part III: The semi‐implicit form , 1998 .

[50]  Jonathan Richard Shewchuk,et al.  Delaunay refinement algorithms for triangular mesh generation , 2002, Comput. Geom..

[51]  LS‐DYNA and the 8:1 differentially heated cavity , 2002 .

[52]  T. Hughes,et al.  Convergence analyses of Galerkin least-squares methods for symmetric advective-diffusive forms of the Stokes and incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1993 .

[53]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Possibilities of finite calculus in computational mechanics , 2004 .

[54]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[55]  Shihe Xin,et al.  An extended Chebyshev pseudo‐spectral benchmark for the 8:1 differentially heated cavity , 2002 .

[56]  J. Heinrich,et al.  Heat Transfer Rates in Natural Convection at High Rayleigh Numbers in Rectangular Enclosures: a Numerical Study , 1982 .

[57]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[58]  W. Wall,et al.  Fixed-point fluid–structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation , 2008 .

[59]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  A stabilized finite element method for incompressible viscous flows using a finite increment calculus formulation , 2000 .

[60]  Guillaume Houzeaux,et al.  The fixed-mesh ALE approach for the numerical approximation of flows in moving domains , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[61]  H. Si,et al.  Adaptive tetrahedral mesh generation by constrained Delaunay refinement , 2008 .

[62]  J. Boyle,et al.  Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches , 2008 .

[63]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction problems with strong added‐mass effect , 2009 .

[64]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  The particle finite element method: a powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free‐surfaces and breaking waves , 2004 .

[65]  P. Betsch,et al.  Numerical integration of rigid body dynamics in terms of quaternions , 2008 .