Design Rationale and Dimensional Considerations for a Femoral Neck Prosthesis

Despite the high level of survivorship of cemented and uncemented stemmed components, there is a need for a joint prosthesis that does not invade the femoral canal. This type of prosthesis would be useful in treating younger and more active patients, in whom the use of such a design would usefully prolong the time before a conventional total joint replacement design was necessary. We present the rationale for a femoral neck prosthesis and show its feasibility as an off-the-shelf system based on a morphologic analysis of the proximal femur. The new design concept consists of a barrel with longitudinal flutes that enters the neck of the femur, loads on the calcar, and contacts the lateral cortex below the greater trochanter. Areas of porous ingrowth are placed so that the load transfer between the implant and the bone resembles that of the two main trabecular patterns in the proximal femur. A new method, cluster analysis, was used for defining a set of 12 sizes that could fit a population of femurs with acceptable dimensional discrepancies. We conclude that this type of device could be implanted reproducibly so that it was a close fit against the target areas of bone in the proximal neck area and against the lateral cortex.

[1]  A S Greenwald,et al.  Weight-bearing areas in the human hip joint. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  J. Devogelaer,et al.  Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  S. Kreuzer,et al.  Impact of Implant Design on Femoral Head Hemiresurfacing Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J. Fetto,et al.  Reexamination of hip biomechanics during unilateral stance. , 1995, American journal of orthopedics.

[5]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  B. Morrey,et al.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Clinical and functional outcome of the Thrust Plate Prosthesis: short- and medium-term results. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  T D Brown,et al.  In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. Krauspe,et al.  Strain Adaptive Bone Remodelling in Total Joint Replacement , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  A. Catterall Human Joints and their Artificial Replacements , 1979 .

[11]  L. Whiteside,et al.  Fixation of the modular total hip femoral component in cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Hua,et al.  The Effect of a Lateral Flare Feature on Uncemented Hip Stems , 1999 .

[13]  D. Back,et al.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  B. Morrey,et al.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY , 2000 .

[15]  M. Müller-Gerbl The Subchondral Bone Plate , 1998, Advances in Anatomy Embryology and Cell Biology.

[16]  W. Akeson,et al.  Characterization of arthroplasty tissue after 14 years post‐cup arthroplasty: A morphological and biochemical assessment , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.