Property Transaction Taxes and the Housing Market: Evidence from Notches and Housing Stimulus in the UK

We provide evidence on the eect of property transaction taxes (stamp duty) on house prices, the timing of house transactions, and the volume of house transactions. To address these questions, we exploit administrative data covering the universe of stamp duty tax returns in the United Kingdom from 2005-2011 along with compelling sources of identifying variation. First, discontinuous jumps in the stamp duty at threshold property prices|notches|allow us to estimate the eect of the tax on house prices. Second, anticipated and unanticipated changes in the tax schedule allow us to estimate the dynamics of price responses and timing eects on house transactions. Third, a temporary exemption of some properties from the tax|a stamp duty holiday|aimed at stimulating the housing market during recession allows us to provide micro evidence on macro stimulus policy. We nd that the eect of transaction taxes on house prices is large (often larger than the tax itself) and that dynamic adjustment to changes in transaction taxes is very fast. We also nd that the timing of house transactions responds sharply to anticipated tax increases. Finally, temporary cuts in transaction taxes successfully stimulate housing market activity in the short run|a 1% cut in the tax achieves a stimulus eect of 10% additional transactions at its peak|but the temporary boost in activity is followed by a slump in activity after the policy is withdrawn. The cumulative eect

[1]  Sumit Agarwal,et al.  The Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research The Reaction of Consumer Spending and Debt to Tax Rebates – Evidence from Consumer Credit Data , 2007 .

[2]  Gary V. Engelhardt,et al.  Housing capital-gains taxation and homeowner mobility: Evidence from the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 , 2008 .

[3]  J. Poterba Taxation and Housing: Old Questions, New Answers , 1992 .

[4]  H. Rosen Owner occupied housing and the federal income tax: Estimates and simulations , 1979 .

[5]  Hui Shan The Effect of Capital Gains Taxation on Home Sales: Evidence from the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 , 2011, Journal of public economics.

[6]  W. Randolph,et al.  Measuring Permanent Responses to Capital-Gains Tax Changes in Panel Data , 1994 .

[7]  Xilong Chen,et al.  Income Distribution and Housing Prices : An Assignment Model Approach , 2009 .

[8]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: Evidence from Danish Tax Records. , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[9]  Henrik Jacobsen Kleven,et al.  Using Notches to Uncover Optimization Frictions and Structural Elasticities: Theory and Evidence from Pakistan* , 2013 .

[10]  A. Auerbach Capital Gains Taxation in the United States: Realizations, Revenue, and Rhetoric , 1988 .

[11]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Housing decisions and the U.S. income tax: An econometric analysis , 1979 .

[12]  G. Duranton,et al.  The effects of land transfer taxes on real estate markets: evidence from a natural experiment in Toronto , 2012 .

[13]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review , 2009 .

[14]  Amir Sufi,et al.  The Effects of Fiscal Stimulus: Evidence from the 2009 &Apos;Cash for Clunkers&Apos; Program , 2010 .

[15]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points? , 1999 .

[16]  W. Kopczuk Mansion Tax: The Effect of Transfer Taxes on the Residential Real Estate Market , 2014 .

[17]  J. Poterba Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach , 1984 .

[18]  H. Rosen Housing Subsidies: Effects on Housing Decisions, Efficiency, and Equity , 1983 .

[19]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Why Can Modern Governments Tax so Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries , 2009 .