Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.

PURPOSE Endorectal (ER) coil-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is often used to obtain anatomic and metabolic images of the prostate and to accurately identify and assess the intraprostatic lesions. Recent advancements in high-field (3 Tesla or above) MR techniques affords significantly enhanced signal-to-noise ratio and makes it possible to obtain high-quality MRI data. In reality, the use of rigid or inflatable endorectal probes deforms the shape of the prostate gland, and the images so obtained are not directly usable in radiation therapy planning. The purpose of this work is to apply a narrow band deformable registration model to faithfully map the acquired information from the ER-based MRI/MRSI onto treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS AND MATERIALS A narrow band registration, which is a hybrid method combining the advantages of pixel-based and distance-based registration techniques, was used to directly register ER-based MRI/MRSI with CT. The normalized correlation between the two input images for registration was used as the metric, and the calculation was restricted to those points contained in the narrow bands around the user-delineated structures. The narrow band method is inherently efficient because of the use of a priori information of the meaningful contour data. The registration was performed in two steps. First, the two input images were grossly aligned using a rigid registration. The detailed mapping was then modeled by free form deformations based on B-spline. The limited memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm (L-BFGS), which is known for its superior performance in dealing with high-dimensionality problems, was implemented to optimize the metric function. The convergence behavior of the algorithm was studied by self-registering an MR image with 100 randomly initiated relative positions. To evaluate the performance of the algorithm, an MR image was intentionally distorted, and an attempt was then made to register the distorted image with the original one. The ability of the algorithm to recover the original image was assessed using a checkerboard graph. The mapping of ER-based MRI onto treatment planning CT images was carried out for two clinical cases, and the performance of the registration was evaluated. RESULTS A narrow band deformable image registration algorithm has been implemented for direct registration of ER-based prostate MRI/MRSI and CT studies. The convergence of the algorithm was confirmed by starting the registration experiment from more than 100 different initial conditions. It was shown that the technique can restore an MR image from intentionally introduced deformations with an accuracy of approximately 2 mm. Application of the technique to two clinical prostate MRI/CT registrations indicated that it is capable of producing clinically sensible mapping. The whole registration procedure for a complete three-dimensional study (containing 256 x 256 x 64 voxels) took less than 15 min on a standard personal computer, and the convergence was usually achieved in fewer than 100 iterations. CONCLUSIONS A deformable image registration procedure suitable for mapping ER-based MRI data onto planning CT images was presented. Both hypothetical tests and patient studies have indicated that the registration is reliable and provides a valuable tool to integrate the ER-based MRI/MRSI information to guide prostate radiation therapy treatment.

[1]  H. Thaler,et al.  Endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinically localized prostate cancer: is it accurate? , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[2]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  3D nonlinear PET-CT image registration algorithm with constrained Free-Form Deformations , 2003 .

[4]  B. Daniel,et al.  Integrating deformable MRI/MRSI and CT image registration into the prostate IMRT treatment planning , 2003 .

[5]  C C Ling,et al.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd Edition , 1992 .

[8]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Luis Ibáñez,et al.  Narrow Band to Image Registration in the Insight Toolkit , 2003, WBIR.

[10]  P. Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Use of MRI and spectroscopy in evaluation of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[14]  A. Boyer,et al.  Inverse planning for functional image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[16]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, and MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[17]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Sung Yong Shin,et al.  Scattered Data Interpolation with Multilevel B-Splines , 1997, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[19]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  P. Carroll,et al.  Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Dennis W J Klomp,et al.  Initial Experience of 3 Tesla Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 1H-Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[22]  B. Daniel,et al.  In vivo prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using two‐dimensional J‐resolved PRESS at 3 T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Sung Yong Shin,et al.  Image Metamorphosis with Scattered Feature Constraints , 1996, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[24]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. , 1989, Radiology.

[25]  James M Balter,et al.  Mutual information based CT registration of the lung at exhale and inhale breathing states using thin-plate splines. , 2004, Medical physics.

[26]  M. Zaider,et al.  Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  A H Baydush,et al.  Feasibility of optimizing the dose distribution in lung tumors using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography guided dose prescriptions. , 2004, Medical physics.

[28]  M. Unser,et al.  Spline Pyramids for Inter-Modal Image Registration Using Mutual Information , 1997 .

[29]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[30]  David L Wilson,et al.  A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[31]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  BorgeforsGunilla Hierarchical Chamfer Matching , 1988 .

[34]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used?--A decision analytic approach. , 2000, Radiology.

[35]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[36]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformation before and during MR imaging-guided brachytherapy. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[37]  Lei Dong,et al.  Automatic registration of the prostate for computed-tomography-guided radiotherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[38]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study. , 1999, Radiology.

[39]  B. Daniel,et al.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. , 2004, Medical physics.