Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to pursue a deeper understanding of nurses' perceptions of a computerized nursing care plan as written in comments on a survey. BACKGROUND Studies have examined nurses' perceptions of computer use, but comments written on surveys of computerized nursing care planning have never been reported and the pattern and meaning of such feedback have not been systematically analysed. DESIGN Of 738 nurses in Taiwan who completed a two-part survey to evaluate a computerized nursing care plan, 202 responded on part II to an open-ended question about overall perceptions of a nursing information system. METHODS A sample of 10 questionnaires with comments was subjected to qualitative content analysis. Key words and phrases were identified, then grouped into categories, which were used to code the remaining respondents' comments. Another 20 were used to pilot test these coding categories. The final coding categories were applied to all 202 questionnaires with comments for data analysis. RESULTS Nurses were concerned about inconvenient access to computers; reduced work efficiency; inability to individualize patient care and nursing specialty deficiencies; poor content design, system function, and system integration; using the system as a policy requirement; and privacy and legal issues. CONCLUSIONS Hardware availability, content design and user training/education programmes are critical issues that affect nurses' use of computers in their daily practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE These comments can be applied in strategic planning and staff development programmes to further use of information systems in patient care.

[1]  Meridean Maas,et al.  Written and computerized care plans. Organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. , 2002, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[2]  F W Lee,et al.  Adoption of electronic medical records as a technology innovation for ambulatory care at the Medical University of South Carolina. , 2000, Topics in health information management.

[3]  D. Wardell,et al.  Technology assessment for nursing innovations. , 1993, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[4]  K. Dennis,et al.  Point of care technology: impact on people and paperwork. , 1993, Nursing economic$.

[5]  M. Getty,et al.  A comparative study of the attitudes of users and non-users towards computerized care planning. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[6]  M. Sobol,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of computerized technology in health care systems. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[7]  C. Newton,et al.  A study of nurses' attitudes and quality of documents in computer care planning. , 1995, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[8]  S. B. Bierer,et al.  Home Care Nurses' Attitudes Toward Computers , 2003 .

[9]  Carolyn E Aydin,et al.  Nursing Documentation Time During Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record , 2003, The Journal of nursing administration.

[10]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Evaluating computerized health information systems: hardware, software and human ware: experiences from the Northern Province, South Africa. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[11]  K. Bowles The barriers and benefits of nursing information systems. , 1997, Computers in nursing.

[12]  M Sleutel,et al.  As good as it gets? Going online with a clinical information system. , 1999, Computers in nursing.

[13]  R. Nahm,et al.  Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[14]  R Wilson,et al.  Introduction of wireless, pen-based computing among visiting nurses in the inner city: a qualitative study. , 1997, Journal of community health nursing.

[15]  E. Hillan,et al.  Computers in midwifery practice: a view from the labour ward. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Ting-Ting Lee,et al.  Evaluation of computerized nursing care plan: instrument development. , 2004, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[17]  J Allan,et al.  Patient-centered documentation: an effective and efficient use of clinical information systems. , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[18]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Satisfaction with a computerized practitioner order-entry system at two military health care facilities. , 2000, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[19]  L. Alpay,et al.  Information Technology Training in Primary Care: The Nurses’ Voice , 2002, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[20]  Dennis Ke,et al.  Point of care technology: impact on people and paperwork. , 1993 .

[21]  Lun-Hui Ho,et al.  Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  Alexa Stuifbergen,et al.  Answers to unasked questions: writing in the margins. , 1999, Research in nursing & health.

[23]  D Miranda,et al.  Lessons learned during 15 years of clinical information system experience. , 2001, Computers in nursing.

[24]  J. Larrabee,et al.  Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. , 2001, Computers in nursing.

[25]  B L Harris,et al.  Becoming deprofessionalized: One aspect of the staff nurse's perspective on computer‐mediated nursing care plans , 1990, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[26]  C. Lowry,et al.  Nurses' attitudes toward computerised care plans in intensive care. Part 2. , 1994, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[27]  Axford Rl,et al.  Impact of clinical information systems on nursing practice. Nurses' perspectives. , 1996 .

[28]  A. Minnick,et al.  The impact of computerized documentation on nurses' use of time. , 1996, Computers in nursing.

[29]  M. Mills,et al.  Nurse-Computer Performance: Considerations for the Nurse Administrator , 1994, The Journal of nursing administration.