Genetic information and crime investigation : social, ethical and public policy aspects of the establishment, expansion and police use of the National DNA Database.

The recent incorporation of forensic DNA identification technology into the criminal justice systems of a growing number of countries has been fast and far reaching. In developing and using DNA profiling for forensic purposes many criminal jurisdictions across the world have followed a common trajectory: from its case-by-case use to support the investigation and prosecution of a small number of homicides and sexual assaults, to the recovery of biological samples and the comparison of DNA profiles as an extensive and routine practice in the investigation of a wide range of crimes including property and auto crime. Essential to this development has been the introduction and expansion of DNA databases or 'registers' which contain collections of genetic profiles derived from biological samples lawfully collected from widening categories of individuals. The National DNA Database (NDNAD) of England & Wales is one such database. This report provides an account of the NDNAD and its uses that we hope will stimulate discussion and debate among and across a range of stakeholders – including forensic scientists, crime scene personnel, police officers, policy makers, and members of the legal profession – who contribute to making the NDNAD ‘work’ and among other interested parties – including human rights groups, academics, and bio-ethicists – who respond to, and sometimes influence, understandings and applications of this forensic instrument. But we also hope to promote, in supplying a comprehensive overview of the historical development, current use, and potential changes in DNA profiling and databasing in England & Wales, an understanding of the NDNAD beyond those with a ‘hands on’ interest in its use.

[1]  Á. Carracedo,et al.  Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation , 2000, Journal of medical ethics.

[2]  Clive Norris,et al.  Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control , 1998 .

[3]  R. Young,et al.  From Suspect to Trial , 2002 .

[4]  A. Sanders,et al.  The Case for the Prosecution: Police Suspects and the Construction of Criminality , 1993 .

[5]  David Garland,et al.  The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society , 2001 .

[6]  Gary Edmond Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence , 2000 .

[7]  Beverley V. Steventon Statistical Evidence and the Courts—Recent Developments , 1998 .

[8]  N. Rose,et al.  Governing economic life , 1990 .

[9]  G. Robertson The role of police surgeons , 1992 .

[10]  Paul Britton,et al.  Picking Up the Pieces , 2010 .

[11]  D. Lyon Surveillance society: Monitoring Everyday Life , 2001 .

[12]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  An assessment of whether SNPs will replace STRs in national DNA databases--joint considerations of the DNA working group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) and the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). , 2004, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[13]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[14]  R. Ericson,et al.  Policing the Risk Society , 1997 .

[15]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[16]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[17]  Ian D. Brownlee Taking DNA samples without consent from mentally disordered offenders: The impact of Home Office Circular 27/1997 , 1998 .

[18]  Robert Heaton,et al.  The prospects for intelligence‐led policing: Some Historical and quantitative considerations , 2000 .

[19]  M. Heller,et al.  Rapid determination of single base mismatch mutations in DNA hybrids by direct electric field control. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Rolland L. Soule,et al.  Techniques of crime scene investigation , 1966 .

[21]  Marilyn T. Miller,et al.  Henry Lee's Crime Scene Handbook , 2001 .

[22]  V W Weedn,et al.  Real-time microchip PCR for detecting single-base differences in viral and human DNA. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  G. Armstrong,et al.  The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV , 1999 .

[24]  Robin Williams,et al.  Circuits of Surveillance. , 2002, Surveillance & society.

[25]  Martin Richards,et al.  How Distinctive is Genetic Information , 2001 .

[26]  Nj Tilley,et al.  Forensic science and crime investigation , 1996 .

[27]  H. Coleman,et al.  DNA in the Courtroom: A Trial Watcher's Guide , 1994 .

[28]  Mike Redmayne Expert Evidence and Criminal Justice , 2001 .

[29]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of DNA Profiling Data in Forensic Identification Applications , 1997 .

[30]  M. Lynch The Discursive Production of Uncertainty , 1998 .

[31]  D. Beyleveld Ethical issues in the forensic applications of DNA analysis , 1997 .

[32]  Graeme Laurie,et al.  Genetic Privacy: Privacy: anti-social concept or fundamental right? , 2002 .

[33]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  What's New About the "New Surveillance"? Classifying for Change and Continuity. , 2002 .

[34]  C. Willmore,et al.  The role of forensic science evidence in criminal proceedings , 1992 .

[35]  Science and Law , 2001 .

[36]  Stuart H. James,et al.  Forensic Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Investigative Techniques , 2002 .