Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project

Abstract Urban green infrastructure (UGI) is a promising concept when developing multifunctional green space systems to address major challenges of urbanization such as increasing social cohesion, promoting the transition to a green economy, adaptation to climate change and conservation of biodiversity. In response to the European Commission’s Communication on Green Infrastructure from 2013, the GREEN SURGE project aimed to further advance the development of UGI in European cities by (i) strengthening the conceptual foundations of UGI, (ii) developing improved methods and tools for assessment of its state, benefits and governance and, (iii) applying these to build a stronger evidence base. This paper aims to provide an overall synthesis of the project’s main achievements. GREEN SURGE adopted an inter- and transdisciplinary approach. Urban Learning Labs and focal Learning Alliances in five cities were instrumental for intensive collaboration between disciplines and across science and practice. Pan-European surveys, e.g. of planning and governance practice or human-nature interactions established the state-of-the-art across the continent and identified good practices. The project consolidated green infrastructure planning and governance conceptually, and it mapped opportunities for better linking government-led planning with bottom-up initiatives for creating and managing UGI. It also introduced a framework for knowledge integration to support UGI valuation. Importantly, development and application of the concept of biocultural diversity gave new insights into human–nature relationships in multicultural urban societies. The results strongly call for more context-sensitive development of UGI that addresses the different needs and diverse cultural practices of people engaging with nature. In a nutshell, GREEN SURGE showed that UGI indeed can make a major contribution to sustainable and resilient urbanisation. Transdisciplinary research in urban labs, if well-conceived, has shown to hold great potential to advance UGI concepts, methods, knowledge and practice.

[1]  R. Fuller,et al.  FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities? , 2013 .

[2]  Leonie K. Fischer,et al.  Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation , 2016 .

[3]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The scaling of green space coverage in European cities , 2009, Biology Letters.

[4]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Considering the ways biocultural diversity helps enforce the urban green infrastructure in times of urban transformation , 2016 .

[5]  M. Pintar,et al.  Co-creating urban green infrastructure connecting people and nature: A guiding framework and approach. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Nadja Kabisch,et al.  Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006 , 2013 .

[7]  C. Kambites,et al.  Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK 1 , 2006 .

[8]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services , 2013 .

[9]  U. Franck,et al.  Zooming into temperature conditions in the city of Leipzig: how do urban built and green structures influence earth surface temperatures in the city? , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  S. Pauleit,et al.  A stakeholder approach, door opener for farmland and multifunctionality in urban green infrastructure , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[11]  D. Haase,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services on brownfields in Leipzig, Germany , 2018 .

[12]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research , 2015 .

[13]  Simona R. Grădinaru,et al.  Green infrastructure in strategic spatial plans: Evidence from European urban regions , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[14]  S. Vetter,et al.  Ways of Belonging: Meanings of “Nature” AMong Xhosa-Speaking Township Residents In South Africa , 2016, Journal of Ethnobiology.

[15]  Kati Vierikko,et al.  Governing cities reflexively—The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services , 2016 .

[16]  J. Dodson,et al.  The ‘Infrastructure Turn’ in Australian Metropolitan Spatial Planning , 2009 .

[17]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Double Insurance in Dealing with Extremes: Ecological and Social Factors for Making Nature-Based Solutions Last , 2017 .

[18]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  Advanced Urban Green Infrastructure Planning and Implementation - Innovative Approaches and Strategies from European Cities: Deliverable 5.2. Technical Report of the Green Surge Project , 2016 .

[19]  D. Haase,et al.  Adding Natural Areas to Social Indicators of Intra-Urban Health Inequalities among Children: A Case Study from Berlin, Germany , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas , 2015 .

[21]  S. Pauleit,et al.  Multifunctional green infrastructure planning to promote ecological services in the city , 2011 .

[22]  Birgit H. M. Elands,et al.  The ‘green’ and ‘self’ in green self-governance – a study of 264 green space initiatives by citizens , 2018 .

[23]  R. Lafortezza,et al.  The long-term prospects of citizens managing urban green space: From place making to place-keeping? , 2017 .

[24]  K. Gaston,et al.  Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions , 2016 .

[25]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Bioculturally valuable but not necessarily worth the price: Integrating different dimensions of value of urban green spaces , 2016 .

[26]  T. Delshammar,et al.  Beyond green: Broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities , 2018 .

[27]  Juliane Mathey,et al.  Greening cities – To be socially inclusive?: About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities , 2017 .

[28]  Joep Verhagen,et al.  Learning alliances for integrated and sustainable innovations in urban water management , 2008 .

[29]  Rieke Hansen,et al.  A comparative exploration of uptake and potential application of ecosystem services in urban planning , 2015 .

[30]  K. Lapintie.  Green Structure and Urban Planning , 2005 .

[31]  Teresa Zölch,et al.  Urban Landscapes and Green Infrastructure , 2017 .

[32]  K. F. Wiersum,et al.  Biocultural diversity: A novel concept to assess human-nature interrelations, nature conservation and stewardship in cities , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[33]  I. M. Buizer,et al.  The governance of urban green spaces in selected EU-cities : Policies, Practices, Actors, Topics , 2015 .

[34]  Ciara,et al.  Seeds of the Future in the Present: Exploring Pathways for Navigating Towards “Good” Anthropocenes , 2018 .

[35]  Rieke Hansen,et al.  Innovative Governance for Urban Green Infrastructure : A Guide for Practitioners , 2017 .

[36]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[37]  T. Delshammar,et al.  Cultivating nature‐based solutions: The governance of communal urban gardens in the European Union , 2017, Environmental research.

[38]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[39]  Varuni Jayasooriya,et al.  Tools for Modeling of Stormwater Management and Economics of Green Infrastructure Practices: a Review , 2014, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[40]  T. Delshammar,et al.  Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: Sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use , 2018 .

[41]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management , 2017 .

[42]  Paul Osmond,et al.  Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies , 2016, Urban Ecosystems.

[43]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Stewardship in Urban Landscapes , 2017 .

[44]  Alexander P. N. van der Jagt,et al.  A spatial framework for targeting urban planning for pollinators and people with local stakeholders: A route to healthy, blossoming communities? , 2017, Environmental research.

[45]  T. Matthews,et al.  Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: Barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners , 2015 .

[46]  A. S. Olafsson,et al.  Participation through place-based e-tools: A valuable resource for urban green infrastructure governance? , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[47]  Kati Vierikko,et al.  Policy interpretations and manifestation of biocultural diversity in urbanized Europe: conservation of lived biodiversity , 2015, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[48]  B. Ambrose-Oji,et al.  Innovative Governance of Urban Green Spaces : Learning from 18 innovative examples across Europe , 2016 .

[49]  J. Ahern.  Green Infrastructure For Cities The Spatial Dimension , 2007 .

[50]  David C Rouse,et al.  Green Infrastructure: A Landscape Approach , 2013 .

[51]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  Green Infrastructure Planning and Implementation: The status of European green space planning and implementation based on an analysis of selected European city-regions. , 2015 .

[52]  L. Tyrväinen,et al.  The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the contingent valuation method , 1998 .

[53]  Michael W. Strohbach,et al.  Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data , 2017 .

[54]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services , 2015 .

[55]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Urban green space availability in European cities , 2016 .

[56]  Paulina Guerrero,et al.  Revealing Cultural Ecosystem Services through Instagram Images : The Potential of Social Media Volunteered Geographic Information for Urban Green Infrastructure Planning and Governance , 2016 .

[57]  J. Byrne,et al.  Can urban greenspace combat climate change? Towards a subtropical cities research agenda , 2009 .

[58]  B. Ambrose-Oji,et al.  Participatory Governance of Urban Green Spaces: Trends and Practices in the EU , 2017 .

[59]  S. Pauleit,et al.  Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: Upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[60]  C. Folke,et al.  Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services , 2014, AMBIO.

[61]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services , 2012 .

[62]  Martina Artmann,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation , 2014, AMBIO.

[63]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: Insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services , 2016 .

[64]  Ian Mell.  Global Green Infrastructure: Lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management , 2016 .

[65]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Biodiverse edible schools: Linking healthy food, school gardens and local urban biodiversity , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[66]  Kim Willems,et al.  The Impact of In-Store Greenery on Customers , 2012 .

[67]  Jakub Kronenberg,et al.  Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing , 2016 .

[68]  Edward T. McMahon,et al.  Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities , 2006 .

[69]  A. Kaźmierczak,et al.  Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review , 2007 .

[70]  D. Haase,et al.  Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use , 2017 .

[71]  Johan Colding,et al.  'ecological land-use complementation' for building resilience in urban ecosystems , 2007 .

[72]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? , 2017, Ecological Indicators.

[73]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Plant population success across urban ecosystems: A framework to inform biodiversity conservation in cities , 2018 .

[74]  Chris Zevenbergen,et al.  Learning and Action Alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: a new framework from empirical evidence from The Netherlands , 2011 .

[75]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance , 2016 .

[76]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Associations Between Neighborhood Open Space Attributes and Quality of Life for Older People in Britain , 2009 .

[77]  Nadja Kabisch,et al.  Structural Diversity: A Multi-dimensional Approach to Assess Recreational Services in Urban Parks , 2014, AMBIO.

[78]  Salman Qureshi,et al.  Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities , 2016 .