A ureteral stricture disease score and classification system: correlation with upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery complexity

Background To develop an original and standardized ureteral stricture disease (USD) score and classification system for quantifying ureter stricture characteristics, assessing complexity of the minimally invasive upper urinary tract reconstructive (UUTR) surgical procedure, formulating preoperative plans, and offering objective comparisons of surgical techniques between different institutions and surgeons. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a test set of 64 patients and a validation set of 170 patients who underwent minimally invasive UUTR surgery from January 2018 to January 2021. Three factors were selected to be included in the USD score and classification system: (I) stricture etiology (E, 1–2 points); (II) stricture segment (S, 0–3 points); and (III) length of stricture (L, 1–5 points). The UUTR surgery involves low-complex surgeries (cystoscopy with ureteral dilation and stent placement, ureteropyeloplasty, end to end repair, ureteral reimplantation) and high-complex surgeries (onlay repair (buccal mucosae, lingual mucosae, appendix mucosae), Boari flap repair and ileal ureter replacement). Estimated blood loss and operative time were used as surrogate indicators of surgical complexity. Results The interrater reliability of the USD score and classification system was 0.908. A linear relationship between the USD score and estimated blood loss was observed (rs =0.676, P<0.001). The USD score was also correlated with operative time (rs =0.638, P<0.001). A significant difference in USD scores was found between the high and low complexity surgery groups (4 vs. 7, P<0.001). Variability of UUTR surgery is based on USD classification system, but with regularity to conform to. Conclusions The USD score and classification system is a concise, easily applicable, and validated scale to delineate the clinically significant features of ureter stricture that correlate with the complexity of the UUTR surgical procedure. The use of this score and classification system can facilitate preoperative plan and comparison of USD treatments in clinical practice and urological literature. Research with large sample is needed to further examine and modify the use of the system.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Modified Laparoscopic and Robotic Flap Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with a Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: The “Wishbone” Anastomosis and the “Ureteral Plate” Technique , 2021, Urologia Internationalis.

[2]  Kun-lin Yang,et al.  Minimally invasive ileal ureter replacement: Comparative analysis of robot‐assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery , 2021, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  A. Heidenreich,et al.  Modern surgical strategies in the management of complex ureteral strictures. , 2021, Current opinion in urology.

[4]  Sida Cheng,et al.  Experience managing distal ureteral strictures with Boari flap-psoas hitch and comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures , 2020, Translational andrology and urology.

[5]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Laparoscopic and robotic ureteroplasty using onlay flap or graft for the management of long proximal or middle ureteral strictures: our experience and strategy , 2020, International Urology and Nephrology.

[6]  G. Tsourouflis,et al.  Laparoscopic and Robotic Management of Ureteral Stricture in Adults , 2020, In Vivo.

[7]  W. Zhu,et al.  Cine magnetic resonance urography for postoperative evaluation of reconstructive urinary tract after ileal ureter substitution: initial experience. , 2020, Clinical radiology.

[8]  M. Brock,et al.  Interdisciplinary comparison of PADUA and RENAL scoring systems for prediction of conversion to nephrectomy in patients with renal mass scheduled for nephron-sparing surgery. , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[9]  M. Brehmer,et al.  Minimally invasive management of ureteral strictures: a 5-year retrospective study , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Robot-assisted Surgery for Benign Ureteral Strictures: Experience and Outcomes from Four Tertiary Care Institutions. , 2016, European urology.

[11]  Kazumasa Matsumoto,et al.  Improvement in Renal Function and Symptoms of Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Less Than 20% Split Renal Function. , 2016, Journal of endourology.

[12]  B. Breyer,et al.  Urethral Stricture Score is Associated with Anterior Urethroplasty Complexity and Outcome. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. Rink,et al.  Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury and techniques for ureteral reconstruction , 2015, Current opinion in urology.

[14]  M. Kattan,et al.  Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy. , 2015, European urology.

[15]  N. Wiklund,et al.  Ureteral strictures revisited…trying to see the light at the end of the tunnel: a comprehensive review. , 2015, Journal of endourology.

[16]  Kun-lin Yang,et al.  A modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of pelviureteric junction obstruction. , 2015, Urology.

[17]  A. Gorbonos,et al.  Ureteral reimplantation in adults: open versus robotic. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[18]  J. Stolzenburg,et al.  Robot-assisted technique for boari flap ureteral reimplantation: is robot assistance beneficial? , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[19]  N. Buchholz,et al.  Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management of ureteric strictures , 2013, Therapeutic advances in urology.

[20]  H. L. Kim,et al.  RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy , 2011, BJU international.

[21]  Scott E Delacroix,et al.  Urinary tract injures: recognition and management. , 2010, Clinics in colon and rectal surgery.

[22]  Paul Russo,et al.  Commentary on The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth , 2010 .

[23]  Robert G Uzzo,et al.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[24]  H. Winfield,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic excision and ureteroureterostomy for congenital midureteral stricture. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[25]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction for benign stricture disease. , 2007, Urology.

[26]  S. Elliott,et al.  Ureteral injuries: external and iatrogenic. , 2006, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[27]  D. Lifshitz,et al.  Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[28]  C. Chapple,et al.  Principles of ureteric reconstruction , 2000, Current opinion in urology.

[29]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Ureteral stricture formation after removal of impacted calculi. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[30]  F. Marshall,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. , 1984, Urology.