Optimal Error Correction for Computationally Bounded Noise

For adversarial but computationally bounded models of error, we construct appealingly simple and efficient cryptographic encoding and unique decoding schemes whose error-correction capability is much greater than classically possible. In particular: 1) For binary alphabets, we construct positive-rate coding schemes that are uniquely decodable under a 1/2 - γ error rate for any constant γ > 0. 2) For large alphabets, we construct coding schemes that are uniquely decodable under a 1 - R error rate for any information rate R > 0. Our results for large alphabets are actually optimal, since the "computationally bounded but adversarial channel" can simulate the behavior of the q-ary symmetric channel, where q denotes the size of the alphabet, the capacity of which is known to be upper-bounded by 1 - R. Our results hold under minimal assumptions on the communication infrastructure, namely: 1) we allow the channel to be more powerful than the receiver and 2) we only assume that some information about the sender-a public key-is known. (In particular, we do not require any shared secret key or joint local state between sender and receivers).

[1]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  Combinatorial bounds for list decoding , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  List decoding algorithms for certain concatenated codes , 2000, STOC '00.

[3]  Alexander Vardy,et al.  Correcting errors beyond the Guruswami-Sudan radius in polynomial time , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[4]  Richard J. Lipton,et al.  A New Approach To Information Theory , 1994, STACS.

[5]  Morris Plotkin,et al.  Binary codes with specified minimum distance , 1960, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  John Rompel,et al.  One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures , 1990, STOC '90.

[7]  Vladimir M. Blinovsky,et al.  List decoding , 1992, Discrete Mathematics.

[8]  Whitfield Diffie,et al.  New Directions in Cryptography , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometry codes , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Peter Elias,et al.  List decoding for noisy channels , 1957 .

[11]  Silvio Micali,et al.  A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks , 1988, SIAM J. Comput..

[12]  Moni Naor,et al.  Universal one-way hash functions and their cryptographic applications , 1989, STOC '89.

[13]  Madhu Sudan,et al.  Decoding of Reed Solomon Codes beyond the Error-Correction Bound , 1997, J. Complex..

[14]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Error detecting and error correcting codes , 1950 .

[15]  Venkatesan Guruswami List decoding with side information , 2003, 18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings..

[16]  Silvio Micali,et al.  How to sign given any trapdoor permutation , 1992, JACM.

[17]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  Explicit Codes Achieving List Decoding Capacity: Error-Correction With Optimal Redundancy , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Silvio Micali,et al.  Optimal Error Correction Against Computationally Bounded Noise , 2005, TCC.

[20]  Michael Langberg,et al.  Private codes or succinct random codes that are (almost) perfect , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.