Rhythmogram-Based Analysis for Continuous Electrographic Data of the Human Brain

Ecologically relevant stimuli are rarely used in scientific studies because they are difficult to control. Instead, researchers employ simple stimuli with sharp boundaries (in space and time). Here, we explore how the rhythmogram can be used to provide much needed rigorous control of natural continuous stimuli like music and speech. The analysis correlates important features in the time course of stimuli with corresponding features in brain activations elicited by the same stimuli. Correlating the identified regularities of the stimulus time course with the features extracted from the activations of each voxel of a tomographic analysis of brain activity provides a powerful view of how different brain regions are influenced by the stimulus at different times and over different (user-selected) timescales. The application of the analysis to tomographic solutions extracted from magnetoencephalographic data recorded while subjects listen to music reveals a surprising and aesthetically pleasing aspect of brain function: an area believed to be specialized for visual processing is recruited to analyze the music after the acoustic signal is transformed to a feature map. The methodology is ideal for exploring processing of complex stimuli, e.g., linguistic structure and meaning and how it fails, for example, in developmental dyslexia.

[1]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Dynamics of brain activity in motor and frontal cortical areas during music listening: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. Stein,et al.  The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. , 2001, Dyslexia.

[3]  K. Overy Dyslexia and Music , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem , 1990 .

[5]  Anastasios Bezerianos,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic evidence of the interhemispheric asymmetry in echoic memory lifetime and its dependence on handedness and gender , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  J. Desmond,et al.  The neural basis of visual skill learning: an fMRI study of mirror reading. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Jerome Feldman,et al.  Ecological expected utility and the mythical neural code , 2009, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[8]  A. Ioannides Real Time Human Brain Function: Observations and Inferences from Single Trial Analysis of Magnetoencephalographic Signals , 2001, Clinical EEG.

[9]  H. Renvall,et al.  Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[11]  Gi Backhouse A Pianist's Story , 2001 .

[12]  Margaret J. Snowling,et al.  Music and Dyslexia: Opening New Doors , 2001 .

[13]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Mathematical analysis of lead field expansions , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Magnetoencephalography as a Research Tool in Neuroscience: State of the Art , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[15]  Shingo Uchihashi,et al.  The beat spectrum: a new approach to rhythm analysis , 2001, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2001. ICME 2001..