Bounds and Heuristics for Multi-Product Personalized Pricing

We present tight bounds and heuristics for personalized, multi-product pricing problems. Under mild conditions we show that offering a non-personalize price in the direction of a positive vector (factor) has a tight profit guarantee relative to optimal personalized pricing. An optimal non-personalized price is the choice factor, when known. Using a factor vector with equal components results in uniform pricing and has exceedingly mild sufficient conditions for the bound to hold. A robust factor is presented that achieves the best possible performance guarantee. As an application, our model yields a tight lower-bound on the performance of linear pricing relative to personalized non-linear pricing, and suggests effective non-linear price heuristics relative to personalized solutions. Additionally, our model provides guarantees for simple strategies such as bundle-size pricing and component-pricing with respect to personalized mixed bundling policies. Heuristics to cluster customer types are also developed with the goal of improving performance by allowing each cluster to price along its own factor. Numerical results are presented for a variety of demand models, factors and clustering heuristics. In our experiments, economically motivated factors coupled with machine learning clustering heuristics performed best.

[1]  Teofilo F. GONZALEZ,et al.  Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Philip A. Haile,et al.  Connected Substitutes and Invertibility of Demand , 2011 .

[3]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  A unified approach to approximation algorithms for bottleneck problems , 1986, JACM.

[4]  A. Cournot Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth , 1898, Forerunners of Realizable Values Accounting in Financial Reporting.

[5]  G. Gallego,et al.  Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics , 2019, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

[6]  Aydin Alptekinoglu,et al.  The Exponomial Choice Model: A New Alternative for Assortment and Price Optimization , 2015, Oper. Res..

[7]  Christopher M. Snyder,et al.  Bounding the Relative Profitability of Price Discrimination , 2004 .

[8]  Gwenaël Joret,et al.  Assortment Optimisation under a General Discrete Choice Model: A Tight Analysis of Revenue-Ordered Assortments , 2017, EC.

[9]  Danny Segev,et al.  The Approximability of Assortment Optimization Under Ranking Preferences , 2015, Oper. Res..

[10]  Alan T. Sorensen,et al.  Bundle-Size Pricing as an Approximation to Mixed Bundling , 2011 .

[11]  Adam N. Elmachtoub,et al.  The Value of Personalized Pricing , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[12]  G. Perakis,et al.  Distribution-Free Pricing , 2019, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach to Multiproduct Pricing , 2006, Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Phillips,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management , 2012 .

[15]  P. Rusmevichientong,et al.  Assortment Optimization under the Multinomial Logit Model with Random Choice Parameters , 2014 .

[16]  Raghuram Iyengar,et al.  Nonlinear pricing , 2022 .

[17]  D. Bergemann,et al.  Uniform Pricing Versus Third-Degree Price Discrimination , 2020 .