Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations

Civil societies function because people pay taxes and make charitable contributions to provide public goods. One possible motive for charitable contributions, called “pure altruism,” is satisfied by increases in the public good no matter the source or intent. Another possible motive, “warm glow,” is only fulfilled by an individual's own voluntary donations. Consistent with pure altruism, we find that even mandatory, tax-like transfers to a charity elicit neural activity in areas linked to reward processing. Moreover, neural responses to the charity's financial gains predict voluntary giving. However, consistent with warm glow, neural activity further increases when people make transfers voluntarily. Both pure altruism and warm-glow motives appear to determine the hedonic consequences of financial transfers to the public good.

[1]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning , 2004, Science.

[3]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives , 1991 .

[4]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[5]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Dissociating the Role of the Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Striatum in the Computation of Goal Values and Prediction Errors , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D. D. de Quervain,et al.  The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment , 2004, Science.

[7]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI , 2001, Neuroreport.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[9]  William T. Harbaugh.  What do donations buy?: A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow , 1998 .

[10]  P. Montague,et al.  Neural Economics and the Biological Substrates of Valuation , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation , 2002, Neuron.

[12]  S. Huettel,et al.  Activation in the VTA and Nucleus Accumbens Increases in Anticipation of Both Gains and Losses , 2009, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[13]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward , 1997, Science.

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[15]  Camelia M. Kuhnen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking , 2005, Neuron.

[16]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[17]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[19]  R. Poldrack.  Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[21]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[22]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .

[23]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  Human Striatal Responses to Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency , 2004, Neuron.

[24]  Dharol Tankersley,et al.  Altruism is associated with an increased neural response to agency , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Delgado,et al.  Modulation of Caudate Activity by Action Contingency , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  T. Palfrey,et al.  Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why? , 1997 .

[27]  Rebecca Elliott,et al.  Instrumental responding for rewards is associated with enhanced neuronal response in subcortical reward systems , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[29]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Rebates Versus Matching: Does How We Subsidize Charitable Contributions Matter? , 2003 .

[30]  Thomas Kelly,et al.  Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique , 2003 .

[31]  R. Hoskins,et al.  Neural Responses to Taxation and Voluntary Giving Reveal Motives for Charitable Donations , 2007 .

[32]  H. Varian,et al.  On the private provision of public goods , 1986 .

[33]  Bernard Mayo,et al.  THE POSSIBILITY OF ALTRUISM , 1970 .

[34]  P. Diamond.  Optimal tax treatment of private contributions for public goods with and without warm glow preferences , 2006 .

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[36]  R. Dolan,et al.  Brain Responses to the Acquired Moral Status of Faces , 2004, Neuron.

[37]  J. Ashby.  References and Notes , 1999 .

[38]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Neuroeconomics of Charitable Giving and Philanthropy , 2009 .

[39]  L. Nystrom,et al.  Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  J. Grafman,et al.  Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision , 2004, Science.

[42]  Duncan K. Foley,et al.  Rationality and Ideology in Economics , 2014 .

[43]  J. Andreoni.  Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? , 1995 .