A common view of the stabilizing mechanism of methane diffusion flames, including jet and porous flat-plate burner flames, is presented. Two-color particle-imaging velocimetry measured the velocity field in the stabilizing region of jet diffusion flames under near-lifting conditions. Computations using a time-dependent, implicit, third-order accurate numerical model, including semidetailed chemical kinetics and buoyancy effects, revealed the detailed structures of the vertical jet diffusion flames and flat-plate burner flames with different orientations of the plate surface and fuel injection. The numerical results are in a good agreement with the measurements in the flame base locations and surrounding velocity fields. In the calculations of both classes of flames, the highest reactivity spot ( reaction kernel ) with peak rates of heat release, oxygen consumption, and water vapor production, was formed in the relatively low-temperature ( 3 +O→CH 2 O+H reaction predominantly contributed to the heat-release rate peak. Heuristic correlations were found between the heat-release or oxygen-consumption rate and the local velocity over a wide range. At a high coflow air velocity in a jet diffusion flame, the flame base shifted slightly downstream before lifting, resulting in a higher reactivity and thereby withstanding at a higher local velocity. On the other hand, in a long horizontal flat-plate flame with downward fuel injection, a recirculation zone was formed ahead of the flame base, resulting in an order-of-magnitude lower local velocity and reactivity. Therefore, the reaction kernel provides a stationary ignition source and sustained stable combustion for incoming reactants, thus holding the trailing diffusion flame in the oxidizing stream.
[1]
Fumiaki Takahashi,et al.
Structure of the Stabilizing Region of a Laminar Jet Diffusion Flame
,
1988
.
[2]
R. M. Fristrom,et al.
Flames, their structure, radiation and temperature
,
1960
.
[3]
Norbert Peters,et al.
Flame Calculations with Reduced Mechanisms — An Outline
,
1993
.
[4]
The stability of laminar diffusion flames of methane
,
1969
.
[5]
Tadao Takeno,et al.
An experimental study on the stability of jet diffusion flame
,
1975
.
[6]
C. Sung,et al.
Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations
,
1995
.
[7]
A. Vranos,et al.
An experimental study of the stability of hydrogen-air diffusion flames
,
1968
.
[8]
Katsuo Asato,et al.
Structure Analysis of the Stabilizing Region of Plane, Laminar Fuel-Jet. Flames.
,
1980
.
[9]
S. Chung,et al.
On the characteristics of laminar lifted flames in a nonpremixed jet
,
1991
.
[10]
J. T’ien,et al.
Diffusion Flame Stabilization at the Leading Edge of a Fuel Plate
,
1985
.
[11]
B. Sarka,et al.
Two‐Color Particle‐Imaging Velocimetry
,
1991
.
[12]
Larry Goss,et al.
Numerical investigations of transitional H2/N2 jet diffusion flames
,
1994
.
[13]
N. Peters,et al.
Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Applications in Combustion Systems
,
1993
.