Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.

One-hundred left-right noise-pairs were generated, all with a fixed value of long-term interaural coherence, 0.9922. The noises had a center frequency of 500 Hz, a bandwidth of 14 Hz, and a duration of 500 ms. Listeners were required to discriminate between these slightly incoherent noises and diotic noises, with a coherence of 1.0. It was found that the value of interaural coherence itself was an inadequate predictor of discrimination. Instead, incoherence was much more readily detected for those noise-pairs with the largest fluctuations in interaural phase or level differences (as measured by the standard deviations). One-hundred noise-pairs with the same value of coherence, 0.9922, and geometric mean frequency of 500 Hz were also generated for bandwidths of 108 and 2394 Hz. It was found that for increasing bandwidth, fluctuations in interaural differences varied less between different noise-pairs and that detection performance varied less as well. The results suggest that incoherence detection is based on the size of interaural fluctuations and that the value of coherence itself predicts performance only in the wideband limit.

[1]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Interaural Noise Correlations: Examination of Variables , 1959 .

[2]  A. H. Marshall,et al.  Spatial impression due to early lateral reflections in concert halls: The derivation of a physical measure , 1981 .

[3]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  Laurel H Carney,et al.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: I. Results for human. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H S Colburn,et al.  Detection of tones in reproducible narrow-band noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  David M. Green,et al.  Interaural Phase Effects in the Masking of Signals of Different Durations , 1966 .

[7]  Scott G. Norcross,et al.  Objective Measures of Listener Envelopment in Multichannel Surround Systems , 2003 .

[8]  W. A. Wilbanks,et al.  Detection of monaural signals as a function of interaural noise correlation and signal frequency. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  L. Carney,et al.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: II. Results for rabbit. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  N. Durlach,et al.  Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Detection of a narrow-band noise as a function of the interaural correlation of both signal and masker. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of interaural stimulus uncertainty on binaural signal detection. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S van de Par,et al.  Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  P M Zurek,et al.  Masker-bandwidth dependence in homophasic and antiphasic tone detection. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J H Grose,et al.  The masking-level difference in low-noise noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M Barron,et al.  The current status of spatial impression in concert halls , 2004 .

[18]  R H Gilkey,et al.  Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  H S Colburn,et al.  Interaural correlation discrimination: i. bandwidth and level dependence. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J Blauert,et al.  Auditory spaciousness: some further psychoacoustic analyses. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Performance in several binaural‐interaction experiments , 1985 .

[23]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Binaural Listening and Interaural Noise Cross Correlation , 1959 .

[24]  H S Colburn,et al.  Interaural correlation sensitivity. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  S van de Par,et al.  The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  H S Colburn,et al.  Analysis of binaural detection models for dependence on interaural target parameters. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.