On coding the position of letters in words: a test of two models.

Open-bigram and spatial-coding schemes provide different accounts of how letter position is encoded by the brain during visual word recognition. Open-bigram coding involves an explicit representation of order based on letter pairs, while spatial coding involves a comparison function operating over representations of individual letters. We identify a set of priming conditions (subset primes and reversed interior primes) for which the two types of coding schemes give opposing predictions, hence providing the opportunity for strong scientific inference. Experimental results are consistent with the open-bigram account, and inconsistent with the spatial-coding scheme.

[1]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Investigations into the Neural Basis of Structured Representations , 2004 .

[2]  Dennis Norris,et al.  A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[4]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[5]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[7]  Piers L. Cornelissen,et al.  Letter‐position encoding and dyslexia , 2005 .

[8]  J. Platt.  Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[10]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[11]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Chapter 7 Orthographic Neighborhoods and Visual Word Recognition , 1992 .

[12]  C. Whitney.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[14]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[15]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[18]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Platt.  Strong Inference , 2007 .

[22]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Charles E Connor,et al.  Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[25]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[26]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[27]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[28]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding , 2008, Brain and Language.