Structural Assimilation Revisited: Mexican-Origin Nativity and Cross-Ethnic Primary Ties

Classical assimilation theory postulates that over time, members of immigrant groups will develop more primary ties with native members of the host society. However, lack of data has led most research to rely on the study of either spatial mobility or other secondary variables as proxies of primary ties. Using data from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, this research examines primary relations, comparing the number of cross-ethnic strong ties among foreign- and native-born generations of persons of Mexican origin in Los Angeles County. The findings indicate that the native-born are substantially more likely to report cross-ethnic ties than immigrants. Spatial variables only partially explain the effect of primary structural assimilation, implying that both primary group and spatial dynamics play important roles in structural incorporation.

[1]  Yen-Fen Tseng.  Beyond “Little Taipei”: The Development of Taiwanese Immigrant Businesses in Los Angeles 1 , 1995 .

[2]  S. Feld.  The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[4]  R. Waldinger.  The ethnic enclave debate revisited , 1993 .

[5]  L. Verbrugge.  The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[6]  D. Sjoquist,et al.  The Atlanta paradox , 2002 .

[7]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium , 1999 .

[8]  J. Spicer.  Log-Linear Analysis , 2005 .

[9]  L. Lamphere.  Structuring diversity : ethnographic perspectives on the new immigration , 1993 .

[10]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Interpersonal Choice and Networks in China , 1991 .

[11]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[12]  D. Oakes,et al.  Log‐Linear Analysis , 2008 .

[13]  H. Gans.  The Urban Villagers: Group And Class In The Life Of Italian-Americans , 1963 .

[14]  A. Valenzuela,et al.  Prismatic Metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles , 2000 .

[15]  The New Asian Immigration in Los Angeles and Global Restructuring , 1994 .

[16]  John Yinger,et al.  Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination , 1995 .

[17]  A. Portes,et al.  The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays on Networks, Ethnicity, and Entrepreneurship , 1995 .

[18]  Stephen L. Ross,et al.  Housing Discrimination in Metropolitan America: Explaining Changes between 1989 and 2000 , 2005 .

[19]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Are personal communities local? A Dumptarian reconsideration☆ , 1996 .

[20]  E. Rosenbaum.  Product Review: The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience , 2004 .

[21]  R. Alba,et al.  Immigrant Enclaves and Ethnic Communities in New York and Los Angeles , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[22]  A. Portes,et al.  Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. , 1987 .

[23]  R. Alba,et al.  Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. , 1974 .

[24]  W. Shrum.  Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .

[25]  Elisa Jayne Bienenstock,et al.  Bridging Social Networks and Female Labor- Force Participation in a Multiethnic Metropolis. , 1999 .

[26]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  BRINGING STRONG TIES BACK IN INTERPERSONAL GATEWAYS TO POLITICAL INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE , 1991 .

[27]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Ethnic Residential Segregation : A Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Review , 1985 .

[29]  James A. Crispino.  The Assimilation of Ethnic Groups: The Italian Case. , 1981 .

[30]  A. Bryman,et al.  Handbook of data analysis , 2004 .

[31]  W. Yancey.  Emergent Ethnicity: A Review and Reformulation. , 1976 .

[32]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Ego's important discussants or significant people: an experiment in varying the wording of personal network name generators , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[33]  A. Portes,et al.  Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation , 2004 .

[34]  Gilda L. Ochoa.  Mexican Americans' attitudes toward and interactions with Mexican immigrants : A qualitative analysis of conflict and cooperation , 2000 .

[35]  H. Gans.  The Levittowners: Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community , 1967 .

[36]  W. Zelinsky,et al.  Heterolocalism: an alternative model of the sociospatial behaviour of immigrant ethnic communities. , 1998, International journal of population geography : IJPG.

[37]  G. Suttles.  THE SOCIAL ORDER OF THE SLUM Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City , 1970 .

[38]  James R. Elliott.  Social Isolation and Labor Market Insulation: Network and Neighborhood Effects on Less-Educated Urban Workers , 1999 .

[39]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Trends in the residential segregation of blacks Hispanics and Asians: 1970-1980. , 1987 .

[40]  Scott J. South,et al.  Geographic Mobility and Spatial Assimilation among U.S. Latino Immigrants 1 , 2005 .

[41]  M. McPherson,et al.  BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .

[42]  R. Alba,et al.  White Ethnic Neighborhoods and Assimilation: The Greater New York Region, 1980–1990 , 1997 .

[43]  J. Westermeyer.  Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States. , 2000 .

[44]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[45]  Michael O. Emerson,et al.  Contact Theory Extended: The Effects of Prior Racial Contact on Current Social Ties , 2002 .

[46]  Douglas S. Massey,et al.  Social Capital and International Migration: A Test Using Information on Family Networks1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Susan Gonzalez Baker,et al.  Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Migration. , 1996 .

[48]  Hugh Louch,et al.  Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[49]  Susan Bibler Coutin,et al.  Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America , 2002 .

[50]  W. C. Carter,et al.  When Desegregation Reduces Interracial Contact: A Class Size Paradox for Weak Ties1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  M. Barron,et al.  Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. , 1964 .

[52]  Rogers Brubaker,et al.  The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States , 2001 .

[53]  Russell A. Kazal.  Revisiting assimilation: The rise, fall, and reappraisal of a concept in American ethnic history , 1995 .

[54]  Herbert J. Gans,et al.  The Urban Villagers , 1962 .

[55]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[56]  Josephine D Lee,et al.  Blue Dreams: Korean Americans and the Los Angeles Riots , 1998 .

[57]  Lance Freeman,et al.  The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties: An Explanatory Analysis , 2001 .

[58]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[59]  A. Nilsen,et al.  The Mexican-American Experience. , 1974 .

[60]  M. White,et al.  Judging not only by color : Ethnicity, nativity, and neighborhood attainment , 2000 .

[61]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[62]  Michael T. Millar.  Fragmented Ties, Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America , 2004 .

[63]  M. Khanye,et al.  An urban experience. , 1989, Nursing RSA = Verpleging RSA.

[64]  Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, 1992-1994: [Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, and Los Angeles]: Version 3 , 1998 .

[65]  Yu Zhou.  HOW DO PLACES MATTER? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CHINESE ETHNIC ECONOMIES IN LOS ANGELES AND NEW YORK CITY , 1998 .